The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: I fully agree with the above comments that this information is much more specialized than I would expect to find in Wikipedia. However, I want to note that creation of such a data page is recommended by
WP:CHEMBOX.. The proposed contents of such a page in the template
Wikipedia:Chemical infobox/Data page appear (to me) more useful than the information on the 2-Pyridone data page, but still rather specialized. I don't know if the editors above are aware of such data pages? Given this, I wanted to clarify whether the issue here was the contents of this specific page, or whether there should be a wider conversation about changing
WP:MOSCHEM?
Mgp28 (
talk)
15:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
We don't need every peak on the NM IR or which spectral lines it makes. This is more for the Merck Manual than a general encyclopedia. I'm not adverse to simply !deleting this either.
Oaktree b (
talk)
14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mgp28Nearly all Chemical data pages are in different styles, some of them are poorly cited. We may need to discuss them one by one before making a bunch of changes.
-Lemonaka07:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: I fully agree with the above comments that this information is much more specialized than I would expect to find in Wikipedia. However, I want to note that creation of such a data page is recommended by
WP:CHEMBOX.. The proposed contents of such a page in the template
Wikipedia:Chemical infobox/Data page appear (to me) more useful than the information on the 2-Pyridone data page, but still rather specialized. I don't know if the editors above are aware of such data pages? Given this, I wanted to clarify whether the issue here was the contents of this specific page, or whether there should be a wider conversation about changing
WP:MOSCHEM?
Mgp28 (
talk)
15:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
We don't need every peak on the NM IR or which spectral lines it makes. This is more for the Merck Manual than a general encyclopedia. I'm not adverse to simply !deleting this either.
Oaktree b (
talk)
14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mgp28Nearly all Chemical data pages are in different styles, some of them are poorly cited. We may need to discuss them one by one before making a bunch of changes.
-Lemonaka07:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.