The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Maybe we should move these articles to the draft space while a user works on trying to get the content from Nova Makedonija to build this article into something that might pass GNG? In its current state, it's way off.
Spiderone18:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well notability guideline clearly states that "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article" and that "if it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate."
Ludost Mlačani (
talk)
21:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well, then you clearly know nothing about our football. Claiming that there no sources for Vardar in Macedonia is like claiming I do not know... there are no sources for Real Madrid in Spain.
Ludost Mlačani (
talk)
10:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I can quote AfD itself here If you wish for an article to be kept, you can directly improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination. You can search out reliable sources, and refute the deletion arguments given using policy, guidelines, and examples from our good and featured articles. If you believe the article topic is valid and encyclopedic, and it lacks only references and other minor changes to survive, you may request help in the task by listing the article on the rescue list in accordance with instructions given at WP:RSLSpiderone14:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Vardar are the most popular football club in North Macedonia, it would be stunning if this season failed
WP:GNG, but it's also going to be difficult to find internet sources for this season.
SportingFlyerT·C12:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: claims of sources existing, they could be offline, but more specific comment is needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
15:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Nomination falsely claims that NSEASONS isn't met. Not only is this a team in a top professional league, it's a top team in the top tier, and played in the
1996–97 UEFA Cup (the predecessor competition to the
UEFA Europa League this season. Referencing should be improved - but that's not a deletion criteria.
Nfitz (
talk)
23:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Maybe we should move these articles to the draft space while a user works on trying to get the content from Nova Makedonija to build this article into something that might pass GNG? In its current state, it's way off.
Spiderone18:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well notability guideline clearly states that "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article" and that "if it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate."
Ludost Mlačani (
talk)
21:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Well, then you clearly know nothing about our football. Claiming that there no sources for Vardar in Macedonia is like claiming I do not know... there are no sources for Real Madrid in Spain.
Ludost Mlačani (
talk)
10:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I can quote AfD itself here If you wish for an article to be kept, you can directly improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination. You can search out reliable sources, and refute the deletion arguments given using policy, guidelines, and examples from our good and featured articles. If you believe the article topic is valid and encyclopedic, and it lacks only references and other minor changes to survive, you may request help in the task by listing the article on the rescue list in accordance with instructions given at WP:RSLSpiderone14:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Vardar are the most popular football club in North Macedonia, it would be stunning if this season failed
WP:GNG, but it's also going to be difficult to find internet sources for this season.
SportingFlyerT·C12:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: claims of sources existing, they could be offline, but more specific comment is needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
15:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Nomination falsely claims that NSEASONS isn't met. Not only is this a team in a top professional league, it's a top team in the top tier, and played in the
1996–97 UEFA Cup (the predecessor competition to the
UEFA Europa League this season. Referencing should be improved - but that's not a deletion criteria.
Nfitz (
talk)
23:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.