- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
1972–73 Eerste Divisie
- 1972–73 Eerste Divisie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable contest SageGreenRider ( talk) 01:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - the second (and professional!) division in the Netherlands = notable. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 12:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - second tier in a professional league. Fenix down ( talk) 13:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - The season of a fully professional league. IJA ( talk) 21:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Completely agree with GiantSnowman. It needs improving, but it by no means should be deleted. - J man708 ( talk) 03:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - per everyone above. Nfitz ( talk) 17:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
1972–73 Eerste Divisie
- 1972–73 Eerste Divisie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable contest SageGreenRider ( talk) 01:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - the second (and professional!) division in the Netherlands = notable. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 12:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - second tier in a professional league. Fenix down ( talk) 13:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - The season of a fully professional league. IJA ( talk) 21:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Completely agree with GiantSnowman. It needs improving, but it by no means should be deleted. - J man708 ( talk) 03:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - per everyone above. Nfitz ( talk) 17:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.