The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
There are a number of these articles, which I nominated for PROD, and was surprised when these two were ineligible for PROD due to past AfDs. These pages serve as essentially a catalog, which Wikipedia is not. For those who trade baseball cards, you'll recognize this as similar to a Beckett pricing guide, but without the pricing. It's not encyclopedic material. The sourcing presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1971 Topps that saved the 1971 Topps page from deletion is insider publications and does not demonstrate significant coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 21:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
There are a number of these articles, which I nominated for PROD, and was surprised when these two were ineligible for PROD due to past AfDs. These pages serve as essentially a catalog, which Wikipedia is not. For those who trade baseball cards, you'll recognize this as similar to a Beckett pricing guide, but without the pricing. It's not encyclopedic material. The sourcing presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1971 Topps that saved the 1971 Topps page from deletion is insider publications and does not demonstrate significant coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 21:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)