- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 1959-60 Cornwall Combination ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Season article for a competition at the 12th (if I see it correctly) level of the English football pyramid. Information is woefully incomplete but basically correct (see this primary source, but that doesn't mean that this is a notable subject of course. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - does not appear to have sufficient coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject to warrant an individual season article. Wikipedia is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 12:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete -- The artivcle does not even make clear what sport this is about, but I presume this concerns a series of amateur teams. If it is about football (soccer), this is presumably a local league of no notability. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment not that it probably matters, but prior to decades of restructuring of the league system, this league would have been quite a bit higher than the 12th level in 1959 -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 10:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG, as the league was (and still is) too minor to generate significant coverage. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above and pinging @ Jose the Tender Engine: to warn about creating non-notable articles. Three out of his four creations (not considering the draft, which is not notable as well) are non-notable tournaments with no evidence of notability whatsoever. BRDude70 ( talk) 18:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 1959-60 Cornwall Combination ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Season article for a competition at the 12th (if I see it correctly) level of the English football pyramid. Information is woefully incomplete but basically correct (see this primary source, but that doesn't mean that this is a notable subject of course. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram ( talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - does not appear to have sufficient coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject to warrant an individual season article. Wikipedia is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 12:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete -- The artivcle does not even make clear what sport this is about, but I presume this concerns a series of amateur teams. If it is about football (soccer), this is presumably a local league of no notability. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment not that it probably matters, but prior to decades of restructuring of the league system, this league would have been quite a bit higher than the 12th level in 1959 -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 10:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG, as the league was (and still is) too minor to generate significant coverage. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above and pinging @ Jose the Tender Engine: to warn about creating non-notable articles. Three out of his four creations (not considering the draft, which is not notable as well) are non-notable tournaments with no evidence of notability whatsoever. BRDude70 ( talk) 18:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.