The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment All these seasons pages up for deletion, I don't know why, but I feel it's unfair to delete the Stoke season pages here. The information is correct, GNG hasn't been established, however it could be if one wants to try. If an editor can created one article for the period, that would be a lot of information on one article, keeping the statistics down, and shortened tables maybe. Then maybe a Redirect to each part of that new article. However, a straight up delete would remove all the legitimate information for the period, and really, I am against doing that.
Govvy (
talk)
15:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply
No incivility here. They are poor nominations. That's civil. And you aren't "asking others opinion on it" are you
User:REDMAN 2019? Why do you make such a claim? Where did you ask these questions? I can't see them. You started, not one AFD process, but similar seasons for the same team, ignoring
WP:BEFORE, ignoring past convention, ignoring
WP:ATD, and ignoring
WP:NOTAVOTE. Why any of these oddball seasons for mostly fully-professional teams wouldn't be a simple redirect I don't know ... don't start the AFD until people have problems with the redirect! And why haven't you withdrawn these clearly flawed nominations already?
Nfitz (
talk)
00:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I was nominating these to find out weather or not Southern League seasons were notable or not. Since the consensus is that they are notable there will be no more nominations on said season articles.
REDMAN 2019 (
talk)
10:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment All these seasons pages up for deletion, I don't know why, but I feel it's unfair to delete the Stoke season pages here. The information is correct, GNG hasn't been established, however it could be if one wants to try. If an editor can created one article for the period, that would be a lot of information on one article, keeping the statistics down, and shortened tables maybe. Then maybe a Redirect to each part of that new article. However, a straight up delete would remove all the legitimate information for the period, and really, I am against doing that.
Govvy (
talk)
15:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)reply
No incivility here. They are poor nominations. That's civil. And you aren't "asking others opinion on it" are you
User:REDMAN 2019? Why do you make such a claim? Where did you ask these questions? I can't see them. You started, not one AFD process, but similar seasons for the same team, ignoring
WP:BEFORE, ignoring past convention, ignoring
WP:ATD, and ignoring
WP:NOTAVOTE. Why any of these oddball seasons for mostly fully-professional teams wouldn't be a simple redirect I don't know ... don't start the AFD until people have problems with the redirect! And why haven't you withdrawn these clearly flawed nominations already?
Nfitz (
talk)
00:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I was nominating these to find out weather or not Southern League seasons were notable or not. Since the consensus is that they are notable there will be no more nominations on said season articles.
REDMAN 2019 (
talk)
10:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.