- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Carleton Knights football. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
1883 Carleton Knights football team
- 1883 Carleton Knights football team ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, no sources found beyond mention that the first season occurred in 1883 - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 18:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge interesting data, but it could be placed in another article.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- I support merging into Carleton Knights football team. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 23:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge and delete. Per Paulmcdonald, the interesting information can be merged; my suggestion is that it be merged into the "History" section of Carleton Knights football. Carleton is a Division III program; it would be rare for the coverage at this level to be sufficient to warrant stand-alone articles for each season. Cbl62 ( talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Carleton Knights football. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
1883 Carleton Knights football team
- 1883 Carleton Knights football team ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, no sources found beyond mention that the first season occurred in 1883 - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 18:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge interesting data, but it could be placed in another article.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- I support merging into Carleton Knights football team. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 23:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge and delete. Per Paulmcdonald, the interesting information can be merged; my suggestion is that it be merged into the "History" section of Carleton Knights football. Carleton is a Division III program; it would be rare for the coverage at this level to be sufficient to warrant stand-alone articles for each season. Cbl62 ( talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.