- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Sandstein 15:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- 1698 Christophe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Could redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn ( talk) 20:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 20:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect. I only found four papers that even mention this (usually there are a dozen or more) and in all cases it was only as a line in a table. Not in-depth enough to satisfy WP:NASTRO. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Sandstein 15:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- 1698 Christophe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Could redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn ( talk) 20:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 20:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect. I only found four papers that even mention this (usually there are a dozen or more) and in all cases it was only as a line in a table. Not in-depth enough to satisfy WP:NASTRO. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.