From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no content left after copyvio has been deleted.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC) reply

11 AM (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced promotional article about a very new television program. No evidence of notabilty. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 18:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 00:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Delete No real content or context, no verifiable notability. Appears to be self-promotion. I feel like a tourist ( talk) 14:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no content left after copyvio has been deleted.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC) reply

11 AM (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced promotional article about a very new television program. No evidence of notabilty. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 18:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 00:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Delete No real content or context, no verifiable notability. Appears to be self-promotion. I feel like a tourist ( talk) 14:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook