The result was delete. Ironholds ( talk) 03:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Clear violations of copyright as detailed in
WP:FU#Text_2: "A complete or partial recreation of "Top 100" or similar lists where the list has been selected in a creative manner.". Articles are offshoots of
100 Greatest/100 Worst, which contains all information acceptable and necessary. (see also previous AFD:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Greatest TV Moments from Hell)
ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹
Speak 20:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating the following related pages as they are also violations of Channel 4's copyright for the reason given above:
Keep/merge all The Channel 4 shows are based upon polls and so the rankings are not creative in the sense meant. The 100 Greatest TV Moments example just list the top ten and so this is a fair use summary of the most significant part of the results. The main issue, to my mind, is that there are numerous clip shows of this kind and so there's some scope for merging our coverage. For an example of the notability of this phenomenon see Consuming history: historians and heritage in contemporary popular culture. Warden ( talk) 17:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ironholds ( talk) 03:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Clear violations of copyright as detailed in
WP:FU#Text_2: "A complete or partial recreation of "Top 100" or similar lists where the list has been selected in a creative manner.". Articles are offshoots of
100 Greatest/100 Worst, which contains all information acceptable and necessary. (see also previous AFD:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Greatest TV Moments from Hell)
ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹
Speak 20:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating the following related pages as they are also violations of Channel 4's copyright for the reason given above:
Keep/merge all The Channel 4 shows are based upon polls and so the rankings are not creative in the sense meant. The 100 Greatest TV Moments example just list the top ten and so this is a fair use summary of the most significant part of the results. The main issue, to my mind, is that there are numerous clip shows of this kind and so there's some scope for merging our coverage. For an example of the notability of this phenomenon see Consuming history: historians and heritage in contemporary popular culture. Warden ( talk) 17:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply