The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can someone address the sources found?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c ) (
m) 19:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Although it looks like this never went anywhere in the 8 years after its proposal, the references in TechCruch, Gizmodo, and engadget are significant, independent, and reliable. That passes
WP:GNG and
WP:NTEMP also applies.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 02:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge content into the history section of
Multi-touch. None of the sources reflect notability beyond the industry sector. I'm honestly not sure if this meets
WP:TOOSOON or is simply just
WP:TOOLATE (yes, I know that guideline doesn't exist). All the tech sources make it clear this was a 'concept' - just a 2009 proposal by Clayton Miller, and now seemingly overtaken by the iPad etc. So this article fails to establish a notable product or application as in
WP:NSOFT. It seems to be more
WP:PROMO, but maybe there's just enough to make it worthy of retention in the multi-touch technology article, but not as a standalone one.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 00:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can someone address the sources found?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c ) (
m) 19:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Although it looks like this never went anywhere in the 8 years after its proposal, the references in TechCruch, Gizmodo, and engadget are significant, independent, and reliable. That passes
WP:GNG and
WP:NTEMP also applies.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 02:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge content into the history section of
Multi-touch. None of the sources reflect notability beyond the industry sector. I'm honestly not sure if this meets
WP:TOOSOON or is simply just
WP:TOOLATE (yes, I know that guideline doesn't exist). All the tech sources make it clear this was a 'concept' - just a 2009 proposal by Clayton Miller, and now seemingly overtaken by the iPad etc. So this article fails to establish a notable product or application as in
WP:NSOFT. It seems to be more
WP:PROMO, but maybe there's just enough to make it worthy of retention in the multi-touch technology article, but not as a standalone one.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 00:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.