- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Userfication available upon request. Kurykh ( talk) 00:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
0000 (video game)
- 0000 (video game) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NGAME. Video game currently in development lacking any sort of notable coverage of it's development. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Maybe this isn't the time or place to ask this question but is the option of moving this page into the user/creator's draft page ever done?
Bfpage
let's talk... 23:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Per WP:DPR, "userfy" is a possible outcome at AFD. So yes, you could argue that right now. Sergecross73 msg me 01:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Maybe this isn't the time or place to ask this question but is the option of moving this page into the user/creator's draft page ever done?
Bfpage
let's talk... 23:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox having it in a sandbox until the game is released seems reasonable to me. Power~enwiki ( talk) 22:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox having it in user space until the game is released and has more coverage seems reasonable. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 01:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox - Per WP: TOOSOON. It's not certain that this game will ever meet notability requirements, but at the least we'll need to wait for the actual release so we can get some decent coverage on the game.-- Martin IIIa ( talk) 14:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Userfication available upon request. Kurykh ( talk) 00:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
0000 (video game)
- 0000 (video game) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NGAME. Video game currently in development lacking any sort of notable coverage of it's development. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Maybe this isn't the time or place to ask this question but is the option of moving this page into the user/creator's draft page ever done?
Bfpage
let's talk... 23:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Per WP:DPR, "userfy" is a possible outcome at AFD. So yes, you could argue that right now. Sergecross73 msg me 01:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Maybe this isn't the time or place to ask this question but is the option of moving this page into the user/creator's draft page ever done?
Bfpage
let's talk... 23:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox having it in a sandbox until the game is released seems reasonable to me. Power~enwiki ( talk) 22:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox having it in user space until the game is released and has more coverage seems reasonable. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 01:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete/Sandbox - Per WP: TOOSOON. It's not certain that this game will ever meet notability requirements, but at the least we'll need to wait for the actual release so we can get some decent coverage on the game.-- Martin IIIa ( talk) 14:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.