- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Treating as an expired proposed deletion due to lack of participation. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 21:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.70-150 Winchester
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- .70-150 Winchester ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable notable cartridge. It was a theoretical cartridge that probably never existed and was never chambered for a firearm. No widespread civilian use, adoption by any nation's armed forces, or use by police forces. Efforts to find reliable sources does not lead to anything.-- Molestash ( talk) 21:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Treating as an expired proposed deletion due to lack of participation. WP:REFUND applies. RL0919 ( talk) 21:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.70-150 Winchester
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- .70-150 Winchester ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable notable cartridge. It was a theoretical cartridge that probably never existed and was never chambered for a firearm. No widespread civilian use, adoption by any nation's armed forces, or use by police forces. Efforts to find reliable sources does not lead to anything.-- Molestash ( talk) 21:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.