- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator (self) -- samtar whisper 16:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable school/educational organization. No references, very few found when searching. -- samtar whisper 12:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- samtar whisper 14:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- samtar whisper 14:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - typically, I'd be all for deleting/redirecting articles on Romanian high schools below the rank of national college, but it looks as though this one may pass. You've got the local media sources ( [1], [2], [3], [4]), which, granted, are sometimes a bit dodgy; you've got the national press article ( [5]); but you also have a published study, Monografia Liceului Pedagogic Bârlad (Iași, 1970, authors: Mihai D. Mîță, Dumitru D. Mîță, Ștefan Cucoș). And a nice scholarly article (p. 13) in Academia Bârlădeană, the local literary/cultural magazine. So I'm fairly confident about this school being notable. - Biruitorul Talk 15:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Eh, I've tried to help out cleaning up the article, there seems there could well be a notable stub in there somewhere -- samtar whisper 16:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination as it seems now other editors and myself have cleared away some of the fluff, and that Biruitorul did some (much better) reference sourcing, the article's topic passes muster.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator (self) -- samtar whisper 16:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable school/educational organization. No references, very few found when searching. -- samtar whisper 12:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- samtar whisper 14:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- samtar whisper 14:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - typically, I'd be all for deleting/redirecting articles on Romanian high schools below the rank of national college, but it looks as though this one may pass. You've got the local media sources ( [1], [2], [3], [4]), which, granted, are sometimes a bit dodgy; you've got the national press article ( [5]); but you also have a published study, Monografia Liceului Pedagogic Bârlad (Iași, 1970, authors: Mihai D. Mîță, Dumitru D. Mîță, Ștefan Cucoș). And a nice scholarly article (p. 13) in Academia Bârlădeană, the local literary/cultural magazine. So I'm fairly confident about this school being notable. - Biruitorul Talk 15:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Eh, I've tried to help out cleaning up the article, there seems there could well be a notable stub in there somewhere -- samtar whisper 16:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination as it seems now other editors and myself have cleared away some of the fluff, and that Biruitorul did some (much better) reference sourcing, the article's topic passes muster.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.