- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shame. Looked kind of cool, judging by the pictures. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Škoda Joyster
- Škoda Joyster ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article relates to a car whose prototype seems to have been 'introduced' in 2006, yet there are no apparent updates to the info. presented. This to me suggests that the car was long(?)-since abandoned. Trafford09 ( talk) 23:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Apparently there are rumours that this car will be launched commercially in India next year... There was certainly some buzz about this car in 2006, all the car media were talking about it, but that could be routine. Is there a special notability guideline for cars? Kraxler ( talk) 14:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 05:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. If the car is successfully launched next year then an article can be created about it after the launch. filceolaire ( talk) 16:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 08:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, re-write
There is plenty of information on the Škoda Joyster with a quick search query. However, the article may need to be re-written to announce that nothing has come of this project, or would that count as original research?
Either way, there is more than enough information on this car out there to say that it exists, and should have an article on it. Solntsa90 ( talk) 09:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, it seems that the 'relaunched' vehicle will have little in common with the original 'concept car' (the subject of this article). In view of that, Delete and rewrite when/if necessary seems apt. Pincrete ( talk) 11:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable "concept car". Kierzek ( talk) 19:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete (for now). Current mentions are rumors and reminiscences of the old concept (this is probably the 3rd announcement, I found 1-2 mentions of a 2010 announcement for 2012). Such news are either speculation or initiated by manufacturer-driven promo activity. Both types of information are unusable to build an article upon. Rewrite when substantial encyclopedic information becomes available. GermanJoe ( talk) 20:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per GermanJoe.-- Staberinde ( talk) 17:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shame. Looked kind of cool, judging by the pictures. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Škoda Joyster
- Škoda Joyster ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article relates to a car whose prototype seems to have been 'introduced' in 2006, yet there are no apparent updates to the info. presented. This to me suggests that the car was long(?)-since abandoned. Trafford09 ( talk) 23:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Apparently there are rumours that this car will be launched commercially in India next year... There was certainly some buzz about this car in 2006, all the car media were talking about it, but that could be routine. Is there a special notability guideline for cars? Kraxler ( talk) 14:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 05:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. If the car is successfully launched next year then an article can be created about it after the launch. filceolaire ( talk) 16:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 08:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, re-write
There is plenty of information on the Škoda Joyster with a quick search query. However, the article may need to be re-written to announce that nothing has come of this project, or would that count as original research?
Either way, there is more than enough information on this car out there to say that it exists, and should have an article on it. Solntsa90 ( talk) 09:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, it seems that the 'relaunched' vehicle will have little in common with the original 'concept car' (the subject of this article). In view of that, Delete and rewrite when/if necessary seems apt. Pincrete ( talk) 11:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable "concept car". Kierzek ( talk) 19:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete (for now). Current mentions are rumors and reminiscences of the old concept (this is probably the 3rd announcement, I found 1-2 mentions of a 2010 announcement for 2012). Such news are either speculation or initiated by manufacturer-driven promo activity. Both types of information are unusable to build an article upon. Rewrite when substantial encyclopedic information becomes available. GermanJoe ( talk) 20:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per GermanJoe.-- Staberinde ( talk) 17:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.