The result was nomination withdrawn with no "delete" opinions. Non-admin closure. Deor ( talk) 13:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails
WP:RS.
Otolemur crassicaudatus (
talk) 21:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
conserveI d' ont agree with this deletion idea. I have just writed one sentence, when the article was proposed for deletion. The Éditions Robert Laffont are one of the most important francophone book publisher, - its unbelievevable that it should diseapeer from the english wikipedia ! Christophe.Neff ( talk) 21:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep Go to www.amazon.fr and do a detailed search, putting "Robert Laffont" as publisher, and you get 11 108 returns! (See [1].)Even accounting for double entries, this makes it a major publisher, and the existence of articles in the French Wikipedia fr:Éditions Robert Laffont and Spanish Wikipedia es:Éditions Robert Laffont backs this up. This article is clearly new and needs time to develop, but deletion is a nonsesnse. Emeraude ( talk) 21:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn with no "delete" opinions. Non-admin closure. Deor ( talk) 13:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Fails
WP:RS.
Otolemur crassicaudatus (
talk) 21:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
reply
conserveI d' ont agree with this deletion idea. I have just writed one sentence, when the article was proposed for deletion. The Éditions Robert Laffont are one of the most important francophone book publisher, - its unbelievevable that it should diseapeer from the english wikipedia ! Christophe.Neff ( talk) 21:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep Go to www.amazon.fr and do a detailed search, putting "Robert Laffont" as publisher, and you get 11 108 returns! (See [1].)Even accounting for double entries, this makes it a major publisher, and the existence of articles in the French Wikipedia fr:Éditions Robert Laffont and Spanish Wikipedia es:Éditions Robert Laffont backs this up. This article is clearly new and needs time to develop, but deletion is a nonsesnse. Emeraude ( talk) 21:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply