The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Was PROD'ed and endorsed by 3 editors, but
DEPROD'ed by creator without explanation. We do not have articles on individual
Roman Numerals as they are not considered to be particularly noteworthy on their own. There is no viable content to merge and the article title is not a suitable redirect.
Strong Delete per my original PROD rationale and endorsement comments. Also noting that Wiktionary and a predatory journal cannot be used to satisfy verifiability requirements. Complex/Rational11:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete - As someone mentioned in the talk page, a delete is more appropriate than a redirect because it's an unconventional title that is unlikely to be used.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
12:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete not a plausible target to be a redirect, we already have
VIII as a redirect which would be the better place for this if it needed an article. If there is new information about the styling of
Roman numerals - it can be added there. Per above that there is nothing otherwise noteworthy about writing
8 as a roman numeral. —
xaosfluxTalk10:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Was PROD'ed and endorsed by 3 editors, but
DEPROD'ed by creator without explanation. We do not have articles on individual
Roman Numerals as they are not considered to be particularly noteworthy on their own. There is no viable content to merge and the article title is not a suitable redirect.
Strong Delete per my original PROD rationale and endorsement comments. Also noting that Wiktionary and a predatory journal cannot be used to satisfy verifiability requirements. Complex/Rational11:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete - As someone mentioned in the talk page, a delete is more appropriate than a redirect because it's an unconventional title that is unlikely to be used.
Hey man im josh (
talk)
12:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete not a plausible target to be a redirect, we already have
VIII as a redirect which would be the better place for this if it needed an article. If there is new information about the styling of
Roman numerals - it can be added there. Per above that there is nothing otherwise noteworthy about writing
8 as a roman numeral. —
xaosfluxTalk10:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.