I am nominating myself, because, well, I like me. I have been a "
wikipedian" for only a short time, but it's been glorious. I think there is a great deal to be done in terms of getting the word out about how great a resource wikipedia can be. I use it everyday to check facts, and to beat people in stupid trivia. I'm sure if I were still in school, that I'd use it for educational research as well.
One key issue to me is that of silly censorship. Yes, you may have been here longer than me, but this is an open community of people working for the same goal. Let's keep it this way.
So grab a pitch fork and a torch and let's hit the streets together and burn whatever monsters there are that might be hampering the cause and progress of Wikipedia!
Support. Quoting
Kafziel, Megalomaniacal lunatics need representation on the ArbCom as much as anyone else. Well put.
Avriette 06:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. I love myself!!! (and yes, I love you too)
Rowlan 06:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Rowlan's account was created on 9 November 2005
[1], and thus he does not have suffrage to vote for himself. --
Interiot 07:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Do not like candidate's attitude towards something as important as nomination for ArbComm membership. Lack of experience is also obvious.—
Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 17:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose as per Ezhiki. --
kingboyk 18:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose, too new and inexperienced.
HGB 19:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Statement indicates candidate utterly unsuitable for arbitration.
Fifelfoo 22:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience. --
Nick123(
t/
c) 22:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) -
Mailer Diablo 02:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience, and it sounds like the user is campaigning for some type of marketing committee, not an arbitrator. –
Comics (
Talk) 08:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose. Answers to questions (see the questions link in the statement section) are evasive at the best, and statements like "who names their kid Yuber anyway" completely fails to comprehend that there is a world outside the US, and a culture other than what passes for one in America. --
Victim of signature fascism |
help remove biblecruft 18:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Too new.--
Omniwolf 20:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
I am nominating myself, because, well, I like me. I have been a "
wikipedian" for only a short time, but it's been glorious. I think there is a great deal to be done in terms of getting the word out about how great a resource wikipedia can be. I use it everyday to check facts, and to beat people in stupid trivia. I'm sure if I were still in school, that I'd use it for educational research as well.
One key issue to me is that of silly censorship. Yes, you may have been here longer than me, but this is an open community of people working for the same goal. Let's keep it this way.
So grab a pitch fork and a torch and let's hit the streets together and burn whatever monsters there are that might be hampering the cause and progress of Wikipedia!
Support. Quoting
Kafziel, Megalomaniacal lunatics need representation on the ArbCom as much as anyone else. Well put.
Avriette 06:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. I love myself!!! (and yes, I love you too)
Rowlan 06:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Rowlan's account was created on 9 November 2005
[1], and thus he does not have suffrage to vote for himself. --
Interiot 07:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Do not like candidate's attitude towards something as important as nomination for ArbComm membership. Lack of experience is also obvious.—
Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 17:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose as per Ezhiki. --
kingboyk 18:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose, too new and inexperienced.
HGB 19:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Statement indicates candidate utterly unsuitable for arbitration.
Fifelfoo 22:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience. --
Nick123(
t/
c) 22:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose(Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) -
Mailer Diablo 02:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience, and it sounds like the user is campaigning for some type of marketing committee, not an arbitrator. –
Comics (
Talk) 08:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose. Answers to questions (see the questions link in the statement section) are evasive at the best, and statements like "who names their kid Yuber anyway" completely fails to comprehend that there is a world outside the US, and a culture other than what passes for one in America. --
Victim of signature fascism |
help remove biblecruft 18:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Too new.--
Omniwolf 20:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply