This candidate has withdrawn from the race; please do not vote. This page is kept primarily for historical reasons. Thank you!
Thanks to all who voted and especially those who left feedback on my run for Arbitrator, I appreciate you taking the time to look over my statement despite my relative lack of experience. I will withdraw from the elections at this time as I think the last week might be better spent focusing on the frontrunners.
RomaC14:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia: You take something, you give something back -- that's how I see it. I've been using Wikipedia as an information source for years now, making occasional edits along the way when something was wrong or just awkward. I registered in 2005 and started making more edits. Oh, I donated the piffling sum of $5 to the fundraising drive (but if everyone gave just five dollars...).
Anyway, I love the Wikipedia project and I do what I can to try and keep it progressing. As an arbitrator, well, I'd do what I could to try and keep it progressing. Philosophy? The
five pillars work for me. Plus an open and inquiring mind. As for banning, I believe that's got to be the last resort, people will find a way to come back and screw with the project if they are simply kicked out. Better to go in with respect and reason first, help people realize that Wikipedia is their place too. And if that fails, then try again. Of course, sometimes that won't work and action will be necessary -- I'm hopeful but not utopian.
Arbitration is more an art than a science in my opinion -- it is impossible to totally control the environment in which the process takes place. I believe I could bring flexibility and resourcefulness to the task.
I realize that my lack of experience is a concern and that I'm running into the
Snowball Clause. I threw my
toque into the ring regardless, to participate in the process and learn from it. Perhaps some of you will remember me when I run again in two years!
Trifon Triantafillidis does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 09:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC) and he had only 26 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (
caveats) —
Cryptic(talk)15:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. It's a terrific, but naive, attitude. I'd love to see you edit more articles and become more prevalent in the community. But oppose for now due to LoE.
Avriette06:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience. User also hasn't identified that they understand the degree of responsibility that arbitration entails. –
Comics (
Talk)
08:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
This candidate has withdrawn from the race; please do not vote. This page is kept primarily for historical reasons. Thank you!
Thanks to all who voted and especially those who left feedback on my run for Arbitrator, I appreciate you taking the time to look over my statement despite my relative lack of experience. I will withdraw from the elections at this time as I think the last week might be better spent focusing on the frontrunners.
RomaC14:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia: You take something, you give something back -- that's how I see it. I've been using Wikipedia as an information source for years now, making occasional edits along the way when something was wrong or just awkward. I registered in 2005 and started making more edits. Oh, I donated the piffling sum of $5 to the fundraising drive (but if everyone gave just five dollars...).
Anyway, I love the Wikipedia project and I do what I can to try and keep it progressing. As an arbitrator, well, I'd do what I could to try and keep it progressing. Philosophy? The
five pillars work for me. Plus an open and inquiring mind. As for banning, I believe that's got to be the last resort, people will find a way to come back and screw with the project if they are simply kicked out. Better to go in with respect and reason first, help people realize that Wikipedia is their place too. And if that fails, then try again. Of course, sometimes that won't work and action will be necessary -- I'm hopeful but not utopian.
Arbitration is more an art than a science in my opinion -- it is impossible to totally control the environment in which the process takes place. I believe I could bring flexibility and resourcefulness to the task.
I realize that my lack of experience is a concern and that I'm running into the
Snowball Clause. I threw my
toque into the ring regardless, to participate in the process and learn from it. Perhaps some of you will remember me when I run again in two years!
Trifon Triantafillidis does not have suffrage; his first edit was at 09:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC) and he had only 26 edits as of 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC). (
caveats) —
Cryptic(talk)15:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. It's a terrific, but naive, attitude. I'd love to see you edit more articles and become more prevalent in the community. But oppose for now due to LoE.
Avriette06:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Lack of experience. User also hasn't identified that they understand the degree of responsibility that arbitration entails. –
Comics (
Talk)
08:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply