I am a relatively new user to Wikipedia, but I enjoy the community and feel that I would be a strong addition to the Arbitration Committee. Before registering, I browsed Wikipedia with an interest on learning the entire process of editing, contributing, submitting AfD, and other procedures. Wikipedia is focused on allowing people to receive the gift of free information and to make sure that all users follow proper procedures and enjoy contributing information. I would follow all procedures accurately, professionally, and do my best to resolve the situation and work closely with other members of the Arbitration Committee. Even though I am a new member to Wikipedia, I promise to fulfill all requirements and be very active with the Committee. I love Wikipedia and contributing, and I’m sure it will be a lasting process. I would be a successful mediator and vote decisively and accurately. I do not hold personal opinions of members, as everyone deserves a fair resolution process. Feel free to ask any questions or concerns that you might have. I would be happy to answer them. Thank you for your time.
Ajwebb20:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Support: Not every person on the committee needs to be someone who’s been here a long time. His writing style indicates that he knows what he’s doing.
Dr. B17:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support This user looks promising. I think that they will work hard and be an excellent edition to Wikipedia. I wish that they did have more experience but I still think that they would help the site.
Turcottem15:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Like to see a mix of young and old hands 'forming' Wikipedia (so to Speak), and I think his lack of experience is buoyed by his good edit style. --
Duey Finster22:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not yet. Withi time we will be able to see how you handle yourself in difficult situations, such as in edit reverting situations and then we can have an idea of how you would handle yourself as an abritrator.
Tony the Marine02:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose There is more to this job than enforcing the rules. In other words: Not just too new, but also too naive. --
EMS |
Talk06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose sorry, but you're just too new (you aren't even eligible to vote) and too inexperienced (you only have 21 article edits). Sorry.
Sarah Ewart10:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I thgink that it's too early to support your bid; we certainly need to see more of you, to see you build a track record, before admitting you to such a considerably powerful rôle. --
It's-is-not-a-genitive10:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Like
the wub I feel you're too inexperienced in the ways of Wikipedia to make a good arbitrator at this time. Continue your good work and stick around for the year and if your still interested run again next time around and I'm sure you'll get more support votes.
Thryduulf11:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The chief quality of an arbitrator is a proven ability to handle conflict in a manner that is wholly consistent with policy. Being new means no proof, no track record, and no experience with policy.
Geogre15:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unfourtuntely due to lack of experience, but a possible candidate for the future, perhaps due to being keen to get involved. All the best and keep up the great contributions to Wikipedia. AgentBlightsoot22:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose - general lack of experience, still too new to editing -- fewer than 50 main namespace edits, fewer than 200 overall edits, first edit October 5, 2005. --
Mysidia (
talk)
05:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply
I am a relatively new user to Wikipedia, but I enjoy the community and feel that I would be a strong addition to the Arbitration Committee. Before registering, I browsed Wikipedia with an interest on learning the entire process of editing, contributing, submitting AfD, and other procedures. Wikipedia is focused on allowing people to receive the gift of free information and to make sure that all users follow proper procedures and enjoy contributing information. I would follow all procedures accurately, professionally, and do my best to resolve the situation and work closely with other members of the Arbitration Committee. Even though I am a new member to Wikipedia, I promise to fulfill all requirements and be very active with the Committee. I love Wikipedia and contributing, and I’m sure it will be a lasting process. I would be a successful mediator and vote decisively and accurately. I do not hold personal opinions of members, as everyone deserves a fair resolution process. Feel free to ask any questions or concerns that you might have. I would be happy to answer them. Thank you for your time.
Ajwebb20:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Support: Not every person on the committee needs to be someone who’s been here a long time. His writing style indicates that he knows what he’s doing.
Dr. B17:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support This user looks promising. I think that they will work hard and be an excellent edition to Wikipedia. I wish that they did have more experience but I still think that they would help the site.
Turcottem15:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Like to see a mix of young and old hands 'forming' Wikipedia (so to Speak), and I think his lack of experience is buoyed by his good edit style. --
Duey Finster22:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not yet. Withi time we will be able to see how you handle yourself in difficult situations, such as in edit reverting situations and then we can have an idea of how you would handle yourself as an abritrator.
Tony the Marine02:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose There is more to this job than enforcing the rules. In other words: Not just too new, but also too naive. --
EMS |
Talk06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose sorry, but you're just too new (you aren't even eligible to vote) and too inexperienced (you only have 21 article edits). Sorry.
Sarah Ewart10:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I thgink that it's too early to support your bid; we certainly need to see more of you, to see you build a track record, before admitting you to such a considerably powerful rôle. --
It's-is-not-a-genitive10:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Like
the wub I feel you're too inexperienced in the ways of Wikipedia to make a good arbitrator at this time. Continue your good work and stick around for the year and if your still interested run again next time around and I'm sure you'll get more support votes.
Thryduulf11:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The chief quality of an arbitrator is a proven ability to handle conflict in a manner that is wholly consistent with policy. Being new means no proof, no track record, and no experience with policy.
Geogre15:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unfourtuntely due to lack of experience, but a possible candidate for the future, perhaps due to being keen to get involved. All the best and keep up the great contributions to Wikipedia. AgentBlightsoot22:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose - general lack of experience, still too new to editing -- fewer than 50 main namespace edits, fewer than 200 overall edits, first edit October 5, 2005. --
Mysidia (
talk)
05:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)reply