2018 Arbitration Committee Elections
Status as of 06:26 (UTC), Thursday, 25 July 2024 (
)
These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
Just like any great thing, some people just wish to "unsubscribe", so let's (not) forget about them, please.
In fact, next year there should be a note at the bottom of the message saying how to unsubscribe. Jidanni ( talk) 13:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
{{
ACEMM}}
template on how to opt-out in the future. —
CYBERPOWER (
Merry Christmas)
20:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)It might be useful to adjust the elections page to explain in more detail what goes on with the scrutineering process, and what the time frame has historically been. I'm somewhat aware of the effort involved and so I completely understand why it takes the time it does, but I think a lot of the people clamoring for results early on are doing so because they think it's taking 1–2 weeks to just sum up the support/neutral/oppose columns and publish the results. GorillaWarfare (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Probably good idea, I'll assume someone else will do it (and eventually do it myself next year)? — regards, Revi 14:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Excellent suggestion, GorillaWarfare; it would also improve transparency and reduce opportunities for stress and conflict, perhaps especially if accompanied by notification of which stage(s) of the process was/were currently ongoing. ... .Tlhslobus (talk) 20:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
2018 Arbitration Committee Elections
Status as of 06:26 (UTC), Thursday, 25 July 2024 (
)
These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
Just like any great thing, some people just wish to "unsubscribe", so let's (not) forget about them, please.
In fact, next year there should be a note at the bottom of the message saying how to unsubscribe. Jidanni ( talk) 13:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
{{
ACEMM}}
template on how to opt-out in the future. —
CYBERPOWER (
Merry Christmas)
20:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)It might be useful to adjust the elections page to explain in more detail what goes on with the scrutineering process, and what the time frame has historically been. I'm somewhat aware of the effort involved and so I completely understand why it takes the time it does, but I think a lot of the people clamoring for results early on are doing so because they think it's taking 1–2 weeks to just sum up the support/neutral/oppose columns and publish the results. GorillaWarfare (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Probably good idea, I'll assume someone else will do it (and eventually do it myself next year)? — regards, Revi 14:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Excellent suggestion, GorillaWarfare; it would also improve transparency and reduce opportunities for stress and conflict, perhaps especially if accompanied by notification of which stage(s) of the process was/were currently ongoing. ... .Tlhslobus (talk) 20:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)