Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
I removed an image that I believed was pushing an agenda of pro-America-ism, rather than presenting the facts of the article directly. My removal was reverted by the other party, and I reverted it back . They then broke 3RR by reverting again, and I think I did the same. Seeing as they will not discuss the issue, I see no other option than to contact the AMA.
Taking a close look of the image, it is in violation of Wikipedia Policy on images as it was uploaded by Duke53 ( talk · contribs) without a copyright notice (see: Image:Anti_America.jpg) and is an unfree image that was taken from a news article and disseminated over the web in various forms. The easiest way to take action against it would be listing it under Speedy Deletion, which I already have. Let's see what happens. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Just as a note, for the record, there was no 3RR violation that I could see on either account. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
OkamiItto, seeing that the image in question was taken down as a copyrght violation, are there any other problems that you would like to have addressed within this dispute? אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Duke 53, seeing that there was no 3RR violation (of which you expressed displeasure in being accused of), I would like to hear what other concerns you may have about the article's content or anything else relevant to the edit dispute that you would like to have discussed? אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
I removed an image that I believed was pushing an agenda of pro-America-ism, rather than presenting the facts of the article directly. My removal was reverted by the other party, and I reverted it back . They then broke 3RR by reverting again, and I think I did the same. Seeing as they will not discuss the issue, I see no other option than to contact the AMA.
Taking a close look of the image, it is in violation of Wikipedia Policy on images as it was uploaded by Duke53 ( talk · contribs) without a copyright notice (see: Image:Anti_America.jpg) and is an unfree image that was taken from a news article and disseminated over the web in various forms. The easiest way to take action against it would be listing it under Speedy Deletion, which I already have. Let's see what happens. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Just as a note, for the record, there was no 3RR violation that I could see on either account. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
OkamiItto, seeing that the image in question was taken down as a copyrght violation, are there any other problems that you would like to have addressed within this dispute? אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Duke 53, seeing that there was no 3RR violation (of which you expressed displeasure in being accused of), I would like to hear what other concerns you may have about the article's content or anything else relevant to the edit dispute that you would like to have discussed? אמר Steve Caruso ( desk/ AMA) 22:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status: