Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
User:RPJ continues to violate WP:NPOV, WP:NPA, WP:OR and WP:V. When asked to provide sources for his information, he changes the subject to begin debates on the accuracy of the Warren Commission, and claims that I want to delete information I disagree with. No matter how many times I call for reliable sources and explain I don't want to delete information, he wrongfully accuses me of deleting information I disagree with. I am tired of this. The user has been blocked 5 times for his boorish behavior but nothing seems to work. In the best case scenario, I would like this user banned from Wikipedia. However, maybe a stern rebuke from other impartial editors and possibly the arbitration committee will be enough to stop this madness.
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
User:RPJ continues to violate WP:NPOV, WP:NPA, WP:OR and WP:V. When asked to provide sources for his information, he changes the subject to begin debates on the accuracy of the Warren Commission, and claims that I want to delete information I disagree with. No matter how many times I call for reliable sources and explain I don't want to delete information, he wrongfully accuses me of deleting information I disagree with. I am tired of this. The user has been blocked 5 times for his boorish behavior but nothing seems to work. In the best case scenario, I would like this user banned from Wikipedia. However, maybe a stern rebuke from other impartial editors and possibly the arbitration committee will be enough to stop this madness.
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status: