Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yes
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: New documentation has been provided, yet changes not made. Lack of communication of progress, if any.
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: I have provded 2 NIST publications for documentation and posted on Skybunny discussion page as well as article discussion.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: The correct information added to the article with the help of fresh eyes.
I have been trying to get the correct name of the voice announcer of radio station WWV on the article. Initially, I found documentation to show the article was incorrect. The article was then edited, but through further research, I have found that it is still incorrect. I provided the documentation in the discussion page of the article and this documentation is most recently dated information. I simply think that accuracy is important and the voice of Lee Rodgers should be listed as the voice announcer for radio station wwv.
Hi - to help the AMA with your case, could you please provide a source (which is reliable under wikipedia policy) to back up your assertations above? Thanks, M a rtinp23 18:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Specifially, I'm requesting direct links to pages on the internet, with pag references in the case of PDFs. Sorry for the inconvinience, and thanks -- M a rtinp23 19:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sure, see [1] page 16 in adobe browser or page 6 of publication. Thank you Erager 19:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer: yes
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer: yes
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer: 5
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer: 5
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer: 3
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer: quicker response
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer: nothing
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- Problem seems to have been solved. Sorry for the delay, and feel free to re-open if the case isn't solved. M a rtinp23 22:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yes
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: New documentation has been provided, yet changes not made. Lack of communication of progress, if any.
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: I have provded 2 NIST publications for documentation and posted on Skybunny discussion page as well as article discussion.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: The correct information added to the article with the help of fresh eyes.
I have been trying to get the correct name of the voice announcer of radio station WWV on the article. Initially, I found documentation to show the article was incorrect. The article was then edited, but through further research, I have found that it is still incorrect. I provided the documentation in the discussion page of the article and this documentation is most recently dated information. I simply think that accuracy is important and the voice of Lee Rodgers should be listed as the voice announcer for radio station wwv.
Hi - to help the AMA with your case, could you please provide a source (which is reliable under wikipedia policy) to back up your assertations above? Thanks, M a rtinp23 18:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Specifially, I'm requesting direct links to pages on the internet, with pag references in the case of PDFs. Sorry for the inconvinience, and thanks -- M a rtinp23 19:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sure, see [1] page 16 in adobe browser or page 6 of publication. Thank you Erager 19:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer: yes
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer: yes
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer: 5
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer: 5
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer: 3
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer: quicker response
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer: nothing
Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- Problem seems to have been solved. Sorry for the delay, and feel free to re-open if the case isn't solved. M a rtinp23 22:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)