The incremental inductance rule, attributed to Harold Alden Wheeler [1] by Gupta [2]: 101 and others [3]: 80 is a formula used to compute skin effect resistance and internal inductance in parallel transmission lines when the frequency is high enough that the skin effect is fully developed. Wheeler's concept is that the internal inductance of a conductor is the difference between the computed external inductance and the external inductance computed with all the conductive surfaces receded by one half of the skin depth.
Skin effect resistance is assumed to be equal to the reactance of the internal inductance.
Gupta [2]: 67 gives a general equation with partial derivatives replacing the difference of inductance.
Wadell [4]: 27 and Gupta [2]: 67 state that the thickness and corner radius of the conductors should be large with respect to the skin depth. Garg [3]: 80 further states that the thickness of the conductors must be at least four times the skin depth. Garg [3]: 80 states that the calculation is unchanged if the dielectric is taken to be air and that where is the characteristic impedance and the velocity of propagation, i.e. the speed of light. Paul, 2007, [5] [a]: 149 disputes the accuracy of at very high frequency for rectangular conductors such as stripline and microstrip due to a non-uniform distribution of current on the conductor. At very high frequency, the current crowds into the corners of the conductor.
In the top figure, if
and
then the internal inductance is
and the skin effect resistance is
The incremental inductance rule, attributed to Harold Alden Wheeler [1] by Gupta [2]: 101 and others [3]: 80 is a formula used to compute skin effect resistance and internal inductance in parallel transmission lines when the frequency is high enough that the skin effect is fully developed. Wheeler's concept is that the internal inductance of a conductor is the difference between the computed external inductance and the external inductance computed with all the conductive surfaces receded by one half of the skin depth.
Skin effect resistance is assumed to be equal to the reactance of the internal inductance.
Gupta [2]: 67 gives a general equation with partial derivatives replacing the difference of inductance.
Wadell [4]: 27 and Gupta [2]: 67 state that the thickness and corner radius of the conductors should be large with respect to the skin depth. Garg [3]: 80 further states that the thickness of the conductors must be at least four times the skin depth. Garg [3]: 80 states that the calculation is unchanged if the dielectric is taken to be air and that where is the characteristic impedance and the velocity of propagation, i.e. the speed of light. Paul, 2007, [5] [a]: 149 disputes the accuracy of at very high frequency for rectangular conductors such as stripline and microstrip due to a non-uniform distribution of current on the conductor. At very high frequency, the current crowds into the corners of the conductor.
In the top figure, if
and
then the internal inductance is
and the skin effect resistance is