Hello, Zaeem Maansib, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Pinaki Bhattacharya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pinaki Bhattacharya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bengali language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Banglapedia is NOT a reliable source - Arjayay ( talk) 14:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your kind support! Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 15:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bengali language movement, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 14:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bengal Renaissance, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay ( talk) 14:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 16:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your kind support Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 16:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bengali language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian ( talk) 17:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bengali language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian ( talk) 17:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your kind support! Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 16:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia, as you did at Bengali language movement. Do not subtly change the meaning of existing content without citing references. "Bengali" people are different from "Muslims in Bengal", the former includes people of all religions. You know this. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 06:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 14:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Bbb23 ( talk) 18:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to appeal the block on my account, User: User:Zaeem Maansib, imposed on 18:24, 16 March 2024 by @ Bbb23. I acknowledge the reasons for the block and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies.

I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines and I attempt myself to refrain from the reason that led to the block. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform and contribute positively to the community.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaeem Maansib ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

The reason is not necessary anymore.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 09:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I respectfully request a reconsideration of the block and the opportunity to resume contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Zaeem Maansib Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 09:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to appeal the block on my account, User: User:Zaeem Maansib, imposed on 18:24, 16 March 2024 by @ Bbb23.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaeem Maansib ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I acknowledge the reasons for the block and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines and I attempt myself to refrain from the reason that led to the block. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform and contribute positively to the community. Therefore, the reasons for the block is not necessary anymore.

Decline reason:

This is a general statement that tells us nothing. You are blocked for adding unsourced or poorly sourced content; please speak specifically to this point and tell us specifically what you will change about your editing. 331dot ( talk) 19:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I respectfully request a reconsideration of the block and the opportunity to resume contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Zaeem Maansib Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 09:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing my third appeal to unblock my account,

User: User:Zaeem Maansib, imposed on 18:24, 16 March 2024 by @ Bbb23.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zaeem Maansib ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I newly joined Wikipedia. The reasons for the block of my account is for adding persistent unsourced or poor sources and citations. I acknowledge the reasons for the block that I added poor sources as due to the lack of my knowledge on Wikipedia's guide to referencing and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies on referencing. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines for referencing and making explanatory edits and I willingly attempt myself to refrain from making unexplained edits and adding poor citations and unsourced additions which led to the block of my Wikipedia. I send my sincere apologies for my failure to meaningful responds to warnings. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform, contribute positively to the community and try to add more reliable sources and additions when editing or writing articles and refrain from making unexplanatory edits in Wikipedia. Therefore, I believe that the reasons for the block of my account is not necessary anymore.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I newly joined Wikipedia. The reasons for the block of my account is for adding persistent unsourced or poor sources and citations. I acknowledge the reasons for the block that I added poor sources as due to the lack of my knowledge on Wikipedia's guide to referencing and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies on referencing. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines for referencing and making explanatory edits and I willingly attempt myself to refrain from making unexplained edits and adding poor citations and unsourced additions which led to the block of my Wikipedia. I send my sincere apologies for my failure to meaningful responds to warnings. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform, contribute positively to the community and try to add more reliable sources and additions when editing or writing articles and refrain from making unexplanatory edits in Wikipedia. Therefore, I believe that the reasons for the block of my account is not necessary anymore. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I newly joined Wikipedia. The reasons for the block of my account is for adding persistent unsourced or poor sources and citations. I acknowledge the reasons for the block that I added poor sources as due to the lack of my knowledge on Wikipedia's guide to referencing and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies on referencing. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines for referencing and making explanatory edits and I willingly attempt myself to refrain from making unexplained edits and adding poor citations and unsourced additions which led to the block of my Wikipedia. I send my sincere apologies for my failure to meaningful responds to warnings. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform, contribute positively to the community and try to add more reliable sources and additions when editing or writing articles and refrain from making unexplanatory edits in Wikipedia. Therefore, I believe that the reasons for the block of my account is not necessary anymore. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I newly joined Wikipedia. The reasons for the block of my account is for adding persistent unsourced or poor sources and citations. I acknowledge the reasons for the block that I added poor sources as due to the lack of my knowledge on Wikipedia's guide to referencing and assure you of my understanding and commitment to abide by Wikipedia's policies on referencing. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines for referencing and making explanatory edits and I willingly attempt myself to refrain from making unexplained edits and adding poor citations and unsourced additions which led to the block of my Wikipedia. I send my sincere apologies for my failure to meaningful responds to warnings. I am eager to make productive contributions to the platform, contribute positively to the community and try to add more reliable sources and additions when editing or writing articles and refrain from making unexplanatory edits in Wikipedia. Therefore, I believe that the reasons for the block of my account is not necessary anymore. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I respectfully request a reconsideration of the block and the opportunity to resume contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Zaeem Maansib Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 06:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I respectfully expect cocerned attention from Wikipedia administators for my request for the block appeal on my account . Thank you! Zaeem Maansib ( talk) 15:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply