The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic banned from topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
-- Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Yunshui 雲 水 . I am not going to say anything against this decision , but I feel that the block must be reduced to a small period of one month to two months. I have seen that another user wrote in your talkpage that I am a disaster for this website. First thing most of the sockpuppets were reported by myself. This is something most socks don't do.Darkwind mentioned Um, okay. Blocked, and I'm going to try not to wonder too hard why one would report oneself for socking... . Even in the last case Dord has mentioned Once again, we see self-reported socks. . Secondly some of the sock accusations are wrong , unfortunately they appear in my casepage. I have no relation with Sourcepen and Momanogilgiti. Third I don't think all my socks were simply creating disaster as mentioned by another editor in your talkpage. I will not do any sock puppet again . that's the reason I reported myself . ::::The thing is that first i had an editing dispute with large number of editors on Total Siyapaa talkpage( when the article was protected), and all of them turned out to be LanguageXpert socks. This created a wrong impression in my mind about Wikipedia editors. Later on I had an editing dispute with darknessshines , for which i ultimately faced topic ban. :When my block was existing , I found that darknessshines was blocked for two months.Now that made me think that Wikipedia adminstrators always support the wrong people.Look i am a human being not a machine . All this is psychological .When i want to edit a wrong information about a page and correct it I was not expecting such resistance. (first time I was blocked by dangerous panda for 24 hours as i was removing comments made by languagexpert sock on total siyapaa talk page , unfortunately he was trying to suppress negative reviews and inflate box office gross). Editing Total Siyapaa turned out to be a nightmare because of LX socks. ::If you see my talk page history large number times LanguageXpert socks have vandalised my talkpage here , again , and again , again and again , once again , offensive language , personal attack . :::::I promise I will never create anymore block evading sockpuppets . Kindly make sure that indefinite block should not be forever : as long as i am alive till death , I am ready to accept two months block. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 18:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Honestly, I don't care what you're "ready" to accept. You socked your way through an arb block to violate your topic ban. Maybe read WP:STANDARDOFFER, but that will require you to contribute to some other project constructively and come back here after the specific time. Kuru (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I won't create any socks again ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 13:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Promising not to create more sockpuppets is a step forwards, but there are other issues to, such a edit warring, vandalism, lying, and so on. Under the circumstances, I think that Kuru's offer that you take up Wikipedia:Standard offer is the best you are likely to get, and I suggest that you take it. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Six months have passed ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 16:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Yes, they have, but you have continued socking, so you will not be unblocked. — DoRD ( talk) 16:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I know i will not be unblocked ..........I wanted to tell everybody that a lot of sock accounts are tagged as undertrial socks, which i didn't create.....i don't even have the password of all those accounts in various languages. I don't remember tha password of undertrial account and i am tagged as undertrial sock.
These are not my accounts...................
User:Sumankr1234
User:Deaconbasil
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:Jackliyrd
User:Johnson and jenny
User:Atif aslam kuttaraja
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:জোর্দানলাইটার
User:Jackliyrd
User:ਕਾਸ੍ਮਿਕ ਏਮ੍ਪੇਰੋਰ
User:ਜੋਰਦਾਨਲਿਘ੍ਟਰ
User:Lundbaaz King Shaan Shahid
User:ਬਬਿਤਾ ਅਰੋਰਾ
User:ਬਬੀਤਾ ਦੇ ਪਤੀ
User:PinkElephant57800
User:Redjunipertree
User:Pakistani girl's breasts
User:หทหฟพทฟก
User:ლანგუაგეხპერტ
User:私はあなたにを愛し
User:SharonBrittain
Administrator, who is going to review this might reply me back that check user has cinfirmed........no check user didn't confirm......................in th SPI case page read DoRD's message..DoRD wrote that they may not belong to this master.........nobody listened to him....and these accounts were tagged by mike v and vangajenie.....later on someone copied their style and material scientist tagged the rest. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 07:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not appear to be a request for an unblock. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I AM not A SOCKMASTER
These are not my accounts...................
User:Sumankr1234
User:Deaconbasil
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:Jackliyrd
User:Johnson and jenny
User:Atif aslam kuttaraja
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:জোর্দানলাইটার
User:Jackliyrd
User:ਕਾਸ੍ਮਿਕ ਏਮ੍ਪੇਰੋਰ
User:ਜੋਰਦਾਨਲਿਘ੍ਟਰ
User:Lundbaaz King Shaan Shahid
User:ਬਬਿਤਾ ਅਰੋਰਾ
User:ਬਬੀਤਾ ਦੇ ਪਤੀ
User:PinkElephant57800
User:Redjunipertree
User:Pakistani girl's breasts
User:หทหฟพทฟก
User:ლანგუაგეხპერტ
User:私はあなたにを愛し
User:SharonBrittain
Administrator, who is going to review this might reply me back that check user has cinfirmed........no check user didn't confirm......................in th SPI case page read DoRD's message..DoRD wrote that they may not belong to this master.........nobody listened to him....and these accounts were tagged by mike v and vangajenie.....later on someone copied their style and material scientist tagged the rest.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 07:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
DoRD's message? How about "the following are all Technically indistinguishable from one another and ZORDANLIGHTER"? Huon ( talk) 10:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Silver Samurai is LanguageXpert'S SOCKPUPPET. -- ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 12:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- You should not remove declined unblock requests or other messages related to active sanctions. See also WP:NOTTHEM. I'm pretty close to advocating for removal of talk page access. Huon ( talk) 12:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
RUN CHECK USER. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 12:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Kuru and Huon read the EMail from darthvaderskywalker2011.
ZORDANLIGHTER, Darthvaderskywalker2011 and Silver Samurai are the same person. Right now three accounts are logged in from same IP. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 04:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic banned from topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
-- Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Yunshui 雲 水 . I am not going to say anything against this decision , but I feel that the block must be reduced to a small period of one month to two months. I have seen that another user wrote in your talkpage that I am a disaster for this website. First thing most of the sockpuppets were reported by myself. This is something most socks don't do.Darkwind mentioned Um, okay. Blocked, and I'm going to try not to wonder too hard why one would report oneself for socking... . Even in the last case Dord has mentioned Once again, we see self-reported socks. . Secondly some of the sock accusations are wrong , unfortunately they appear in my casepage. I have no relation with Sourcepen and Momanogilgiti. Third I don't think all my socks were simply creating disaster as mentioned by another editor in your talkpage. I will not do any sock puppet again . that's the reason I reported myself . ::::The thing is that first i had an editing dispute with large number of editors on Total Siyapaa talkpage( when the article was protected), and all of them turned out to be LanguageXpert socks. This created a wrong impression in my mind about Wikipedia editors. Later on I had an editing dispute with darknessshines , for which i ultimately faced topic ban. :When my block was existing , I found that darknessshines was blocked for two months.Now that made me think that Wikipedia adminstrators always support the wrong people.Look i am a human being not a machine . All this is psychological .When i want to edit a wrong information about a page and correct it I was not expecting such resistance. (first time I was blocked by dangerous panda for 24 hours as i was removing comments made by languagexpert sock on total siyapaa talk page , unfortunately he was trying to suppress negative reviews and inflate box office gross). Editing Total Siyapaa turned out to be a nightmare because of LX socks. ::If you see my talk page history large number times LanguageXpert socks have vandalised my talkpage here , again , and again , again and again , once again , offensive language , personal attack . :::::I promise I will never create anymore block evading sockpuppets . Kindly make sure that indefinite block should not be forever : as long as i am alive till death , I am ready to accept two months block. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 18:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Honestly, I don't care what you're "ready" to accept. You socked your way through an arb block to violate your topic ban. Maybe read WP:STANDARDOFFER, but that will require you to contribute to some other project constructively and come back here after the specific time. Kuru (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I won't create any socks again ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 13:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Promising not to create more sockpuppets is a step forwards, but there are other issues to, such a edit warring, vandalism, lying, and so on. Under the circumstances, I think that Kuru's offer that you take up Wikipedia:Standard offer is the best you are likely to get, and I suggest that you take it. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Six months have passed ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 16:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Yes, they have, but you have continued socking, so you will not be unblocked. — DoRD ( talk) 16:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I know i will not be unblocked ..........I wanted to tell everybody that a lot of sock accounts are tagged as undertrial socks, which i didn't create.....i don't even have the password of all those accounts in various languages. I don't remember tha password of undertrial account and i am tagged as undertrial sock.
These are not my accounts...................
User:Sumankr1234
User:Deaconbasil
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:Jackliyrd
User:Johnson and jenny
User:Atif aslam kuttaraja
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:জোর্দানলাইটার
User:Jackliyrd
User:ਕਾਸ੍ਮਿਕ ਏਮ੍ਪੇਰੋਰ
User:ਜੋਰਦਾਨਲਿਘ੍ਟਰ
User:Lundbaaz King Shaan Shahid
User:ਬਬਿਤਾ ਅਰੋਰਾ
User:ਬਬੀਤਾ ਦੇ ਪਤੀ
User:PinkElephant57800
User:Redjunipertree
User:Pakistani girl's breasts
User:หทหฟพทฟก
User:ლანგუაგეხპერტ
User:私はあなたにを愛し
User:SharonBrittain
Administrator, who is going to review this might reply me back that check user has cinfirmed........no check user didn't confirm......................in th SPI case page read DoRD's message..DoRD wrote that they may not belong to this master.........nobody listened to him....and these accounts were tagged by mike v and vangajenie.....later on someone copied their style and material scientist tagged the rest. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 07:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not appear to be a request for an unblock. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I AM not A SOCKMASTER
These are not my accounts...................
User:Sumankr1234
User:Deaconbasil
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:Jackliyrd
User:Johnson and jenny
User:Atif aslam kuttaraja
User:ДфтпгфпуЧзуке
User:זאָרדאַנליגהטער
User:زوردانلگهتر
User:কসমিক এম্পারার
User:জোর্দানলাইটার
User:Jackliyrd
User:ਕਾਸ੍ਮਿਕ ਏਮ੍ਪੇਰੋਰ
User:ਜੋਰਦਾਨਲਿਘ੍ਟਰ
User:Lundbaaz King Shaan Shahid
User:ਬਬਿਤਾ ਅਰੋਰਾ
User:ਬਬੀਤਾ ਦੇ ਪਤੀ
User:PinkElephant57800
User:Redjunipertree
User:Pakistani girl's breasts
User:หทหฟพทฟก
User:ლანგუაგეხპერტ
User:私はあなたにを愛し
User:SharonBrittain
Administrator, who is going to review this might reply me back that check user has cinfirmed........no check user didn't confirm......................in th SPI case page read DoRD's message..DoRD wrote that they may not belong to this master.........nobody listened to him....and these accounts were tagged by mike v and vangajenie.....later on someone copied their style and material scientist tagged the rest.
ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 07:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
DoRD's message? How about "the following are all Technically indistinguishable from one another and ZORDANLIGHTER"? Huon ( talk) 10:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Silver Samurai is LanguageXpert'S SOCKPUPPET. -- ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 12:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- You should not remove declined unblock requests or other messages related to active sanctions. See also WP:NOTTHEM. I'm pretty close to advocating for removal of talk page access. Huon ( talk) 12:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
RUN CHECK USER. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 12:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Kuru and Huon read the EMail from darthvaderskywalker2011.
ZORDANLIGHTER, Darthvaderskywalker2011 and Silver Samurai are the same person. Right now three accounts are logged in from same IP. ZORDANLIGHTER ( talk) 04:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)