Please stop "updating" the references as you have done here and here. It is not an improvement and requires others to clean up after you. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 07:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Umm... ok... I thought I would help contribute since the pages were provided by a generated list of wikipages requiring updating of reference formatting... Xbopper ( talk) 07:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's odd. I'm not sure what exactly would need fixing. Where's the list? — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 08:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I used this link: [1] provided by [2]. I did a preview of the edit result to make sure there weren't issues with the output reference details... Xbopper ( talk) 23:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, your second link is helpful. I think I see what the problem is. The first link assumes that any use of {{ ref}} and {{ note}} is to create footnotes, which has been superceded by {{ reflist}} (or <references>). However, a number of places use those first two templates to create explanatory notes that are separate from the footnotes. The information at {{ ref label}} and {{ note label}} show that there is consensus in reusing {{ ref}} and {{ note}} this way. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 05:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
OK. I think I need to read up more before I try to "help" out... sorry if I created more problems. Xbopper ( talk) 03:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
 | |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot ( talk) 04:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot ( talk) 05:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to
Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton, from its old location at
User:Xbopper/Enter your new article name here. This has been done because the
Draft namespace is the preferred location for
Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on
my talk page. Thank you.
North America
1000 22:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton
Hello, Xbopper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 14:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop "updating" the references as you have done here and here. It is not an improvement and requires others to clean up after you. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 07:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Umm... ok... I thought I would help contribute since the pages were provided by a generated list of wikipages requiring updating of reference formatting... Xbopper ( talk) 07:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's odd. I'm not sure what exactly would need fixing. Where's the list? — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 08:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I used this link: [1] provided by [2]. I did a preview of the edit result to make sure there weren't issues with the output reference details... Xbopper ( talk) 23:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, your second link is helpful. I think I see what the problem is. The first link assumes that any use of {{ ref}} and {{ note}} is to create footnotes, which has been superceded by {{ reflist}} (or <references>). However, a number of places use those first two templates to create explanatory notes that are separate from the footnotes. The information at {{ ref label}} and {{ note label}} show that there is consensus in reusing {{ ref}} and {{ note}} this way. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 05:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
OK. I think I need to read up more before I try to "help" out... sorry if I created more problems. Xbopper ( talk) 03:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
|
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
| |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot ( talk) 04:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot ( talk) 05:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to
Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton, from its old location at
User:Xbopper/Enter your new article name here. This has been done because the
Draft namespace is the preferred location for
Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on
my talk page. Thank you.
North America
1000 22:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton
Hello, Xbopper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Church of Christ Fellowship Clayton".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 14:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)