This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
You're right, I linked the wrong part of WP:CHARTS. In WP:CHARTS, regarding the list of charts that can be used it states: "charts appropriate for wikipedia are not limited to those listed on this page, others can also be included as long as they are IFPI registered" and The R3-30 chart is not IFPI registered ( list here). So please revert your reversion of my edit. I'll be using a different edit summary going forward. TheJazzDalek ( talk) 00:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
quit reverting the lyrical content on Touched By The Crimson King page you dumbass, its all correct and the citations are in the lyrics —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.42.223 ( talk) 21:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
hi!
can you please tell me why do you think that the section i have written into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game#Pen_and_paper has to be deleted?
thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargazer rpgonline.hu ( talk • contribs) 17:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
okay:
- i'm not a native english maybe my english is not perfect but i'm curious if there would be no .hu in my username what would you think.
- i didn't want to make references because i think that would've been spam. i wanted to be neutral. maybe i could've been put a reference for voip. that's true.
- strange, that so far it hadn't disturbed you that there is a section about textually playing rpgs.
- you say, that "Yes, you can play an RPG via text, or over VOIP, or on a cell phone, or with smoke signals, but do we really need to say this?". i think yes we have to mention this, because i think someone who looks up wikipedia for the right answer, probably knows nothing about rpgs, how it can be played and so on. maybe it's useful for beginners that they can search further in certain directions if they want to try to play.
- "Ultimately, you can play an RPG when there are 2 or more people in any place who can communicate in any way." yes maybe you know this, but i think a beginner who has nothing in his or her mind about how it is played exactly in real, should know where and how he or she can try to play.
- i'm honest so i have a website which i think helps beginners to try rpgs almost as it was originally meant to be played. but i didn't want to mention my site because i wanted to be neutral.
- if you don't agree with me, then why is it there in the main section that "Several varieties of RPG exist in electronic media, including text-based MUDs (Multi-User Dungeons) and their graphics-based successors, massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs)." i wouldn't mind if my (objective) thoughts were mentioned in the main section under this.
i wouldn't have written my site name after my username if it wouldn't have been used already by another user.
- or let's put a reference to "virtual tabletop"
please think it through, thanks, stargazer
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Stargazer rpgonline.hu (
talk •
contribs) 07:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
well, i see that you are at home in wikipedia. i'm not. of course there are rules i should know. so all in all what do you suggest for me to do? so what do you think about putting information into wikipedia about possible ways to try rpgs other ways than the traditional. do you think it is not necessary? as i'm writing it on my page and i belive in that (that's why i invested a lot of energy and time to make my website reality), "I think it's no doubt playing a roleplaying game is the best with friends, meeting face to face physically, but there's much more in it, than purely the playing. Rpgonline.hu doesn't want to challenge this, because it wouldn't be possible anyway. But if we just look at the pure game itself, my site is almost a 100% solution, because playing a roleplaying game is much more about saying words and telling the story and imagine what you hear...". i think if wikipedia mentions forum rpgs, which is also just a way like smoke signals, it should mention the virtual tabletop or online gaming methods, because there are even more applications/websites about this. more and more people are looking for this. so what do you think? should we put content like this into wikipedia or not. if yes, how? thanks, stargazer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargazer rpgonline.hu ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
interesting. i've watched the ehow video about creating an article. it says a blog and a forum is not a reliable source. but what else can be a reliable source, if not these? these are showing that there are a lot of people who are seeking this. but if we accept that these are not reliable sources, still there is the question: do we really need to only say what can be referenced? or what is common? i'm sure i can find in no time a lot of articles in wp that are not about common things, methods, etc. the other thing: Fantasy Grounds. it's only a wp article about an application. that it exists and what is it about. if i create a wp article about my site and what is it for and how it works and why is it unique amongst similar solutions, after that i will have reference for my site at virtual tabletop examples? is it okay that way? thanks, stargazer
Hello Wyatt Riot. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fantasy Grounds, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 doesn't apply to software, and I think this classes as software rather than web content. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 19:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The WISE infrared Sky Survey (currently underway), is expected to yield definitive results on the Nemesis question. It already says so in the article.
You are undoing edits without bothering to read the whole article.
That is not only irresponsible, it is vandalism.
Fanatical link deletion isn't helpful to Wikipedia, it's destructive.
76.120.122.12 ( talk) 22:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
OK I've added new citations to that section. From a science magazine-- verifying what is already said in the Wikipedia Nemesis article about the WISE mission, and also discussing the 'Sedna orbital theory' about Nemesis (also created a new section, with citations, for the Sedna theory as it pertains to the Nemesis theory).
76.120.122.12 ( talk) 23:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wyatt,
thx for notifying me, even though I had already noticed your edit. I would welcome your opinion on Talk:Tribal Wars. If you do not consider that a proper place for a discussion on the notability of the subject, please suggest a good place and we can move it there.
kind regards, TeunSpaans ( talk) 20:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
If you are interested in improving the PlaneShift article you are very welcome. I personally think it's one of the game articles with more sources I've seen, and it's fine as it is. Anyway if you are of different advise, please find new sources and add them to the page. Removing information or removing sources is not a way to improve the page at this point. Xyz231 ( talk) 09:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you reviewed my article for creation, State-tistics, but you put it on hold. You did leave me with a very helpful comment, which I happened to resolve (The submission includes reliable sources, but they do not cover the subject. The references merely support the claim "which allows its many users to gain a valuable look at politics" which could be applied to any game. Reliable, third-party published sources covering this game must be supplied to establish notability.), but I was wondering if you would mind coming back to the review as soon as possible. I really appreciate the help. Thanks.
Maretchin ( talk) 17:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make a sharp selection on video games, you may wish to have a look at this game - not even on the market
kind regards, TeunSpaans ( talk) 19:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete it? There was nothing wrong with the article. Please recreate it. There are hundreds of pages just like it that haven't been deleted. Philyboy2012 ( talk) 13:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. And no, I will not thank you, since you are just banding up with the cool group of people that's bashing the page since about 3 years. Xyz231 ( talk) 12:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I seriously think you should remove this phrase from your user page: "I feel that policies against obvious trouble-makers need to be stronger." It's exactly the opposite of what you have shown recently. You managed to bash the only real editor of that page, and help the identified troublemakers to reduce the content of the page. Good job! Xyz231 ( talk) 13:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossespennywinblood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossesbrass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossesminibosses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Wyatt,
I am wondering why you believe Miniconomy not to be an RPG? It is in the exact same genre as eRepublik for example.
Sincerely, mikefeith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikefeith ( talk • contribs) 15:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Lihaas ( talk) 02:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Is it that non sense to add here? Can i ask why some games / application like and some other are included on this Wikipedia? Does the game needs to be famouse first before adding it on Wikipedia? And can i know what should i need to do to include it here :) Thanks in Advance Raiine ( talk) 04:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm new to this site (at least while being registered) but I've come because another user tried to create an article for this game. From what I see, the talk page for that page does not exist. So I don't know how I can discuss anything concerning the game...
The game is in a new beta phase. I for one never played much of the 2d versions of the game, but the 3d version is new so it hasn't been talked about much. I see places that have mentioned them with content such as onrpg.com(reflects the 2d version) and gamespot (screenshots of 3d version). http://www.onrpg.com/MMO/Dead-Frontier http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/deadfrontier/images.html?sid=6282210
I have some videos of normal gameplay that I've captured myself.
NegimaSonic (
talk) 02:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
So what does it take to get a beta game approved? None of the big companies are going to care for quite awhile (unless they happen to randomly find this game). NegimaSonic ( talk) 05:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
NegimaSonic ( talk) 17:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)yup, basically someone's gotta get the admin to make the real sites notice the game...
Just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of [Astro Empires]], as notability has been asserted in the awards section. If you believe it should still be deleted, I would recommend using AFD. Stephen! Coming... 10:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not remove the reviews and interviews on the Astro Empires article, so others can decide for themselves if they are reliable or not. As this article is being considered for deletion it deserves all the arguments, don't you agree? -- 82.154.193.22 ( talk) 04:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Why was Bloodline Champions entry deleted by you with the comment "not an MMO" when there are numerous non-MMO games on the list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.57.114 ( talk) 01:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Not really interested in maintaining the page and even less about wikipedia politics; just wanted to add a game which is aligned with other games on the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.57.114 ( talk • contribs) 04:29, 2 March 2011
the link i put was relevent to the article it mentioned that you could not use mobile phones to play anymore and i was telling the readers that you can log in and how to do it the link i placed on the page was an exaple of how to log into the new travian version 4 that is replacing all serves as it rolls out and [spam link removed] is the link needed to log into travian.com server 9 if that is not directly relevent im a monkeys uncle and you are a scolar
and i wont bother trying to update or correct any of the information on the most unreliable source of information since BING Superconcepts ( talk) 07:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you removed my mention of the Ashes of Athas campaign on the above articles based on notoriety and possible bias. It has now been two months since the Ashes of Athas campaign premiered at a convention. It was received well, written up on a multitude of prominent gaming blogs, mentioned on an official Wizards of the Coast podcast, is about to feature at four more conventions in the next two months, and will have new offerings at the three largest gaming conventions in the US this year. It seems pretty relevant for those pages to have the content. I reviewed the notoriety page but it is difficult to assess the language within the context of gaming (itself a relatively small genre). As a Dark Sun and living campaign fan, I find it really strange to not mention a Dark Sun living campaign. I am one of the admins, so I can understand the worry about bias, but it really isn't my reasoning here. I'm seeking help on understanding at what point a living campaign bears mention. Thanks! -- Alphastream ( talk) 06:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
But look, I've never deleted things that are referenced, I have only things with references completely valids, and I do not understand why these are reverted. -- Asdfmovie ( talk) 19:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the tips about Wikipedia content. I'll be sure to delete stuff right away that doesn't fit the standards. You sure know how to make somebody feel welcome. Qchristensen ( talk) 05:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, noticed that you removed my addition to the list too. Me and the board have gathered together and decided to readd it though. Love, Monkey alan Industries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.139.3 ( talk) 17:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Just because you decide it's spam, doesn't mean it is. There are no medals involved for making peoples life a trial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.228.64 ( talk) 09:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
It's a disease. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Thoughts? Please help stop the insanity. - Object404 ( talk) 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
Hi Wyatt Riot,
I noticed you have previously contributed to the Mankato city page. I'm new to Wikipedia and have been practicing a little on that page, and I wanted to recommend a change. The Academic Institutions section is not very informative, and not up to snuff with Wikipedia's MOS recommendation that sections be written in prose-style. I left a suggestion on the talk page, but (perhaps not surprisingly) I haven't received a response. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know what you think? Thanks! Balloccoli ( talk) 16:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why are you so obsessed with what I'm doing? you kept campaigning to delete my artice, and now you're nagging me about copyright laws for a photo I never actually worked out how to use on an article which no longer exists. Get off my back! by the way, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#The_whole_system_is_unfair_and_biased - I'm sure you'de have plenty of annoying beauracratic comments to make about it— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicianpig ( talk • contribs) 12:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, they've been explained to me, countless times, mostly by you, but what I've been saying on the village pump page is that these tiny picky rules are ridiculous and deliberately confusing. And about that image. It doesn't matter!I didn't even use the image! Now please, GET OFF MY BACK! ( Alicianpig ( talk) 17:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC))
WWIIOL was released June of 2001. That would make it the first MMOFPS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.25.55 ( talk) 05:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
The MMOG article has a section that describes the different types of MMO games and has erroneous information claiming others to be the first MMOFPS, that's all I'm saying. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.25.55 ( talk) 07:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Dragon Raja Online is a classic 2D MMORPG well-known in Asia (and now spread to Europe). Just because Americans (or wherever you're from) are ignorant of it, it doesn't mean it's not a classic. The game has been around since 1999 and still loved by many. Not many MMORPGs, especially from the late 90s, are still around these days. DRO has had servers in numerous Asian regions throughout the last decade, notably in Korea, Hong Kong, Mainland China, and Taiwan. It was at one point one of the top three MMORPG games in Hong Kong, for instance. If you're allowing Wikipedia to be that myopic, then... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.251.131 ( talk) 07:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm totally new to this talking, so please excuse any unintentional impoliteness. Despite the fact that amazon.com lists it as "Reamde", I think it is clear that the title of Stephenson's book is "REAMDE" in all caps. The README file was always all caps, the cover of the book has REAMDE in all caps while every other letter (including the "n" and "s" in neal stephenson) is lowercase, and as far as I can recall every time the word appears in the book it is in all caps. Stephenson obviously knows his Unix conventions, I think he would find the use of "Reamde" incongruous (not that I have asked him).
I just suggest this to you because you're the last person listed in the page change log. I suppose I could do edit it myself, but I'd prefer to leave the job to someone who has invested the time and energy into pages about Stephenson's work.
Thanks! 38.126.23.254 ( talk) 20:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me sir, but I think I know what I am doing. The guy who reversed my edits is an enemy of mine on NS. While no third party sources reported on it, it was quite a big event.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Man Billy-Bob Jenkins ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 3 June 2012
Hi! I have read through your copywrite violation post that you left me, but am not really sure how this falls under that category. Would it be better if I fixed the grammar and changed the wording a bit? The information on that sign is so valuable that it would be a pity and a disservice to the page to not include it.
Also, why was my link removed to the photography from the event? That is all related information, non-commercial and not violating any terms of Wikipedia.
Thanks Greg
Goyo1980 ( talk) 04:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Wyatt Riot,
My posting(s) over on the Anita S article talk page is/are related to a gender-gap list discussion that may have weighed in on the issues late, but some g-gappers were skeptical about notability. I'm open-minded and interested in the consensus. We don't know now, but if evidence of self-promotion appears, which is what has skeptical thinkers speaking up, then it could be revisited. Thanks for your comments, and keep up the thoughtful work. KSRolph ( talk) 20:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
If you will bare with me, I only removed those red links just to reach 1,000 edits. I know it's crazy but, now that I've accomplished my goal, there's no purpose in that. -- Jayemd ( talk) 03:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 03:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Haha, whoops, right you are! CCS81 ( talk) 05:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Typing Wahga will show you Wahga Results except those derived by Google from Wikipedia indicating such term exists. In Pakistan, sign boards also read Wahga and the same exist in Government Record. Even the article
Wagah in WP, writes it in Urdu as واہگہ where ہ in واہگہ is analogous to H.
Since Wahga/Wagah is a shared border between the two countries, it was a good idea to move page to Wagah (Wahga) instead of redirecting. --
SAMI (
talk) 16:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Tribune (Pakistan)-
http://tribune.com.pk/story/475188/religious-tourism-sikh-pilgrims-return-to-india/
Times of India -
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-07-11/india/27177285_1_wagah-border-peace-bus-dosti-bus
And sorry, I didn't see your notice regarding conversation rules with you. Hope you'll overlook. --
SAMI (
talk) 16:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I'm writing specifically about this but also more generally about copyright violation. I have read the WP policy and cannot understand why linking to a documentary is copyright violation. Also, the documentary does not claim that the star exists, but discusses different scientists' theories about what has led some of them to believe that it might exist. The History Channel is a major documentary channel, and the claim that it is "notoriously unreliable" is itself subjective... Thanks in advance! BigSteve ( talk) 17:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
p.s. I've asked Jim1138 to contribute, as he's also of the same opinion as you. Hope you don't mind! BigSteve ( talk) 17:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I've reverted some of your changes to the DragonSpires page. The reason for this is that the Java version of DragonSpires was not a "fan game" or "sequel", but was the actual game handed over to new developers by the creators for the purpose of furthering that same game. It is not a fan work or sequel, but the actual game itself reformatted. Please let this revision stand, since this is not personal but is based in the facts which are now stated clearly in the article. I have removed the sequel sections since you're correct on that account. However, neither of those were "fan" games, and as such I do not know where you came up with the "fan game" reasoning. There were none listed. 4.154.6.11 ( talk) 06:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
You're right, I linked the wrong part of WP:CHARTS. In WP:CHARTS, regarding the list of charts that can be used it states: "charts appropriate for wikipedia are not limited to those listed on this page, others can also be included as long as they are IFPI registered" and The R3-30 chart is not IFPI registered ( list here). So please revert your reversion of my edit. I'll be using a different edit summary going forward. TheJazzDalek ( talk) 00:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
quit reverting the lyrical content on Touched By The Crimson King page you dumbass, its all correct and the citations are in the lyrics —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.42.223 ( talk) 21:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
hi!
can you please tell me why do you think that the section i have written into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game#Pen_and_paper has to be deleted?
thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargazer rpgonline.hu ( talk • contribs) 17:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
okay:
- i'm not a native english maybe my english is not perfect but i'm curious if there would be no .hu in my username what would you think.
- i didn't want to make references because i think that would've been spam. i wanted to be neutral. maybe i could've been put a reference for voip. that's true.
- strange, that so far it hadn't disturbed you that there is a section about textually playing rpgs.
- you say, that "Yes, you can play an RPG via text, or over VOIP, or on a cell phone, or with smoke signals, but do we really need to say this?". i think yes we have to mention this, because i think someone who looks up wikipedia for the right answer, probably knows nothing about rpgs, how it can be played and so on. maybe it's useful for beginners that they can search further in certain directions if they want to try to play.
- "Ultimately, you can play an RPG when there are 2 or more people in any place who can communicate in any way." yes maybe you know this, but i think a beginner who has nothing in his or her mind about how it is played exactly in real, should know where and how he or she can try to play.
- i'm honest so i have a website which i think helps beginners to try rpgs almost as it was originally meant to be played. but i didn't want to mention my site because i wanted to be neutral.
- if you don't agree with me, then why is it there in the main section that "Several varieties of RPG exist in electronic media, including text-based MUDs (Multi-User Dungeons) and their graphics-based successors, massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs)." i wouldn't mind if my (objective) thoughts were mentioned in the main section under this.
i wouldn't have written my site name after my username if it wouldn't have been used already by another user.
- or let's put a reference to "virtual tabletop"
please think it through, thanks, stargazer
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Stargazer rpgonline.hu (
talk •
contribs) 07:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
well, i see that you are at home in wikipedia. i'm not. of course there are rules i should know. so all in all what do you suggest for me to do? so what do you think about putting information into wikipedia about possible ways to try rpgs other ways than the traditional. do you think it is not necessary? as i'm writing it on my page and i belive in that (that's why i invested a lot of energy and time to make my website reality), "I think it's no doubt playing a roleplaying game is the best with friends, meeting face to face physically, but there's much more in it, than purely the playing. Rpgonline.hu doesn't want to challenge this, because it wouldn't be possible anyway. But if we just look at the pure game itself, my site is almost a 100% solution, because playing a roleplaying game is much more about saying words and telling the story and imagine what you hear...". i think if wikipedia mentions forum rpgs, which is also just a way like smoke signals, it should mention the virtual tabletop or online gaming methods, because there are even more applications/websites about this. more and more people are looking for this. so what do you think? should we put content like this into wikipedia or not. if yes, how? thanks, stargazer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargazer rpgonline.hu ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
interesting. i've watched the ehow video about creating an article. it says a blog and a forum is not a reliable source. but what else can be a reliable source, if not these? these are showing that there are a lot of people who are seeking this. but if we accept that these are not reliable sources, still there is the question: do we really need to only say what can be referenced? or what is common? i'm sure i can find in no time a lot of articles in wp that are not about common things, methods, etc. the other thing: Fantasy Grounds. it's only a wp article about an application. that it exists and what is it about. if i create a wp article about my site and what is it for and how it works and why is it unique amongst similar solutions, after that i will have reference for my site at virtual tabletop examples? is it okay that way? thanks, stargazer
Hello Wyatt Riot. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fantasy Grounds, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 doesn't apply to software, and I think this classes as software rather than web content. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 19:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The WISE infrared Sky Survey (currently underway), is expected to yield definitive results on the Nemesis question. It already says so in the article.
You are undoing edits without bothering to read the whole article.
That is not only irresponsible, it is vandalism.
Fanatical link deletion isn't helpful to Wikipedia, it's destructive.
76.120.122.12 ( talk) 22:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
OK I've added new citations to that section. From a science magazine-- verifying what is already said in the Wikipedia Nemesis article about the WISE mission, and also discussing the 'Sedna orbital theory' about Nemesis (also created a new section, with citations, for the Sedna theory as it pertains to the Nemesis theory).
76.120.122.12 ( talk) 23:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wyatt,
thx for notifying me, even though I had already noticed your edit. I would welcome your opinion on Talk:Tribal Wars. If you do not consider that a proper place for a discussion on the notability of the subject, please suggest a good place and we can move it there.
kind regards, TeunSpaans ( talk) 20:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
If you are interested in improving the PlaneShift article you are very welcome. I personally think it's one of the game articles with more sources I've seen, and it's fine as it is. Anyway if you are of different advise, please find new sources and add them to the page. Removing information or removing sources is not a way to improve the page at this point. Xyz231 ( talk) 09:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you reviewed my article for creation, State-tistics, but you put it on hold. You did leave me with a very helpful comment, which I happened to resolve (The submission includes reliable sources, but they do not cover the subject. The references merely support the claim "which allows its many users to gain a valuable look at politics" which could be applied to any game. Reliable, third-party published sources covering this game must be supplied to establish notability.), but I was wondering if you would mind coming back to the review as soon as possible. I really appreciate the help. Thanks.
Maretchin ( talk) 17:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make a sharp selection on video games, you may wish to have a look at this game - not even on the market
kind regards, TeunSpaans ( talk) 19:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete it? There was nothing wrong with the article. Please recreate it. There are hundreds of pages just like it that haven't been deleted. Philyboy2012 ( talk) 13:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. And no, I will not thank you, since you are just banding up with the cool group of people that's bashing the page since about 3 years. Xyz231 ( talk) 12:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I seriously think you should remove this phrase from your user page: "I feel that policies against obvious trouble-makers need to be stronger." It's exactly the opposite of what you have shown recently. You managed to bash the only real editor of that page, and help the identified troublemakers to reduce the content of the page. Good job! Xyz231 ( talk) 13:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossespennywinblood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossesbrass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Minibossesminibosses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 06:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey Wyatt,
I am wondering why you believe Miniconomy not to be an RPG? It is in the exact same genre as eRepublik for example.
Sincerely, mikefeith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikefeith ( talk • contribs) 15:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Lihaas ( talk) 02:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Is it that non sense to add here? Can i ask why some games / application like and some other are included on this Wikipedia? Does the game needs to be famouse first before adding it on Wikipedia? And can i know what should i need to do to include it here :) Thanks in Advance Raiine ( talk) 04:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm new to this site (at least while being registered) but I've come because another user tried to create an article for this game. From what I see, the talk page for that page does not exist. So I don't know how I can discuss anything concerning the game...
The game is in a new beta phase. I for one never played much of the 2d versions of the game, but the 3d version is new so it hasn't been talked about much. I see places that have mentioned them with content such as onrpg.com(reflects the 2d version) and gamespot (screenshots of 3d version). http://www.onrpg.com/MMO/Dead-Frontier http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/deadfrontier/images.html?sid=6282210
I have some videos of normal gameplay that I've captured myself.
NegimaSonic (
talk) 02:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
So what does it take to get a beta game approved? None of the big companies are going to care for quite awhile (unless they happen to randomly find this game). NegimaSonic ( talk) 05:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
NegimaSonic ( talk) 17:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)yup, basically someone's gotta get the admin to make the real sites notice the game...
Just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of [Astro Empires]], as notability has been asserted in the awards section. If you believe it should still be deleted, I would recommend using AFD. Stephen! Coming... 10:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not remove the reviews and interviews on the Astro Empires article, so others can decide for themselves if they are reliable or not. As this article is being considered for deletion it deserves all the arguments, don't you agree? -- 82.154.193.22 ( talk) 04:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Why was Bloodline Champions entry deleted by you with the comment "not an MMO" when there are numerous non-MMO games on the list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.57.114 ( talk) 01:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Not really interested in maintaining the page and even less about wikipedia politics; just wanted to add a game which is aligned with other games on the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.57.114 ( talk • contribs) 04:29, 2 March 2011
the link i put was relevent to the article it mentioned that you could not use mobile phones to play anymore and i was telling the readers that you can log in and how to do it the link i placed on the page was an exaple of how to log into the new travian version 4 that is replacing all serves as it rolls out and [spam link removed] is the link needed to log into travian.com server 9 if that is not directly relevent im a monkeys uncle and you are a scolar
and i wont bother trying to update or correct any of the information on the most unreliable source of information since BING Superconcepts ( talk) 07:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you removed my mention of the Ashes of Athas campaign on the above articles based on notoriety and possible bias. It has now been two months since the Ashes of Athas campaign premiered at a convention. It was received well, written up on a multitude of prominent gaming blogs, mentioned on an official Wizards of the Coast podcast, is about to feature at four more conventions in the next two months, and will have new offerings at the three largest gaming conventions in the US this year. It seems pretty relevant for those pages to have the content. I reviewed the notoriety page but it is difficult to assess the language within the context of gaming (itself a relatively small genre). As a Dark Sun and living campaign fan, I find it really strange to not mention a Dark Sun living campaign. I am one of the admins, so I can understand the worry about bias, but it really isn't my reasoning here. I'm seeking help on understanding at what point a living campaign bears mention. Thanks! -- Alphastream ( talk) 06:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
But look, I've never deleted things that are referenced, I have only things with references completely valids, and I do not understand why these are reverted. -- Asdfmovie ( talk) 19:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the tips about Wikipedia content. I'll be sure to delete stuff right away that doesn't fit the standards. You sure know how to make somebody feel welcome. Qchristensen ( talk) 05:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, noticed that you removed my addition to the list too. Me and the board have gathered together and decided to readd it though. Love, Monkey alan Industries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.139.3 ( talk) 17:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Just because you decide it's spam, doesn't mean it is. There are no medals involved for making peoples life a trial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.228.64 ( talk) 09:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
It's a disease. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Thoughts? Please help stop the insanity. - Object404 ( talk) 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
Hi Wyatt Riot,
I noticed you have previously contributed to the Mankato city page. I'm new to Wikipedia and have been practicing a little on that page, and I wanted to recommend a change. The Academic Institutions section is not very informative, and not up to snuff with Wikipedia's MOS recommendation that sections be written in prose-style. I left a suggestion on the talk page, but (perhaps not surprisingly) I haven't received a response. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know what you think? Thanks! Balloccoli ( talk) 16:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why are you so obsessed with what I'm doing? you kept campaigning to delete my artice, and now you're nagging me about copyright laws for a photo I never actually worked out how to use on an article which no longer exists. Get off my back! by the way, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#The_whole_system_is_unfair_and_biased - I'm sure you'de have plenty of annoying beauracratic comments to make about it— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicianpig ( talk • contribs) 12:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, they've been explained to me, countless times, mostly by you, but what I've been saying on the village pump page is that these tiny picky rules are ridiculous and deliberately confusing. And about that image. It doesn't matter!I didn't even use the image! Now please, GET OFF MY BACK! ( Alicianpig ( talk) 17:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC))
WWIIOL was released June of 2001. That would make it the first MMOFPS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.25.55 ( talk) 05:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
The MMOG article has a section that describes the different types of MMO games and has erroneous information claiming others to be the first MMOFPS, that's all I'm saying. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.25.55 ( talk) 07:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Dragon Raja Online is a classic 2D MMORPG well-known in Asia (and now spread to Europe). Just because Americans (or wherever you're from) are ignorant of it, it doesn't mean it's not a classic. The game has been around since 1999 and still loved by many. Not many MMORPGs, especially from the late 90s, are still around these days. DRO has had servers in numerous Asian regions throughout the last decade, notably in Korea, Hong Kong, Mainland China, and Taiwan. It was at one point one of the top three MMORPG games in Hong Kong, for instance. If you're allowing Wikipedia to be that myopic, then... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.251.131 ( talk) 07:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm totally new to this talking, so please excuse any unintentional impoliteness. Despite the fact that amazon.com lists it as "Reamde", I think it is clear that the title of Stephenson's book is "REAMDE" in all caps. The README file was always all caps, the cover of the book has REAMDE in all caps while every other letter (including the "n" and "s" in neal stephenson) is lowercase, and as far as I can recall every time the word appears in the book it is in all caps. Stephenson obviously knows his Unix conventions, I think he would find the use of "Reamde" incongruous (not that I have asked him).
I just suggest this to you because you're the last person listed in the page change log. I suppose I could do edit it myself, but I'd prefer to leave the job to someone who has invested the time and energy into pages about Stephenson's work.
Thanks! 38.126.23.254 ( talk) 20:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me sir, but I think I know what I am doing. The guy who reversed my edits is an enemy of mine on NS. While no third party sources reported on it, it was quite a big event.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Man Billy-Bob Jenkins ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 3 June 2012
Hi! I have read through your copywrite violation post that you left me, but am not really sure how this falls under that category. Would it be better if I fixed the grammar and changed the wording a bit? The information on that sign is so valuable that it would be a pity and a disservice to the page to not include it.
Also, why was my link removed to the photography from the event? That is all related information, non-commercial and not violating any terms of Wikipedia.
Thanks Greg
Goyo1980 ( talk) 04:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Wyatt Riot,
My posting(s) over on the Anita S article talk page is/are related to a gender-gap list discussion that may have weighed in on the issues late, but some g-gappers were skeptical about notability. I'm open-minded and interested in the consensus. We don't know now, but if evidence of self-promotion appears, which is what has skeptical thinkers speaking up, then it could be revisited. Thanks for your comments, and keep up the thoughtful work. KSRolph ( talk) 20:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
If you will bare with me, I only removed those red links just to reach 1,000 edits. I know it's crazy but, now that I've accomplished my goal, there's no purpose in that. -- Jayemd ( talk) 03:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Jayemd's Sports Quiz Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 03:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Haha, whoops, right you are! CCS81 ( talk) 05:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Typing Wahga will show you Wahga Results except those derived by Google from Wikipedia indicating such term exists. In Pakistan, sign boards also read Wahga and the same exist in Government Record. Even the article
Wagah in WP, writes it in Urdu as واہگہ where ہ in واہگہ is analogous to H.
Since Wahga/Wagah is a shared border between the two countries, it was a good idea to move page to Wagah (Wahga) instead of redirecting. --
SAMI (
talk) 16:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Tribune (Pakistan)-
http://tribune.com.pk/story/475188/religious-tourism-sikh-pilgrims-return-to-india/
Times of India -
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2003-07-11/india/27177285_1_wagah-border-peace-bus-dosti-bus
And sorry, I didn't see your notice regarding conversation rules with you. Hope you'll overlook. --
SAMI (
talk) 16:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I'm writing specifically about this but also more generally about copyright violation. I have read the WP policy and cannot understand why linking to a documentary is copyright violation. Also, the documentary does not claim that the star exists, but discusses different scientists' theories about what has led some of them to believe that it might exist. The History Channel is a major documentary channel, and the claim that it is "notoriously unreliable" is itself subjective... Thanks in advance! BigSteve ( talk) 17:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
p.s. I've asked Jim1138 to contribute, as he's also of the same opinion as you. Hope you don't mind! BigSteve ( talk) 17:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I've reverted some of your changes to the DragonSpires page. The reason for this is that the Java version of DragonSpires was not a "fan game" or "sequel", but was the actual game handed over to new developers by the creators for the purpose of furthering that same game. It is not a fan work or sequel, but the actual game itself reformatted. Please let this revision stand, since this is not personal but is based in the facts which are now stated clearly in the article. I have removed the sequel sections since you're correct on that account. However, neither of those were "fan" games, and as such I do not know where you came up with the "fan game" reasoning. There were none listed. 4.154.6.11 ( talk) 06:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)