Welcome!
Hello, Willpolydna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Cinnamon. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
jonkerz
♠ 10:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome, I note your edit on herpes simplex. Please review the guideline for selecting reliable sources for medical content WP:MEDRS. Reviews, ideally systematic reviews/meta analyses published in peer review journals, and mainstream textbooks. Kind regards, Lesion ( talk) 12:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Journal seems ok, have not checked in detail. Issue is this is a primary source. For medical content, Wikipedia uses secondary sources (i.e. reviews, ideally
systematic reviews and
meta analyses) or tertiary sources (i.e. medical textbooks). For this reason, do not tend to keep up with "breaking science", and mainstream view which often lags behind new developments.
Lesion (
talk) 13:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, I disagree. If no secondary or tertiary source is available then this indicates that aspect of a topic is not (yet) notable for the encyclopedia. Much content slips through the net, or exists from historic edits before WP:RS and WP:MEDRS were developed and as strictly enforced. If you wish to edit medical topics on wikipedia, it is advisable to soundly grasp the MEDRS concept of avoiding primary sources, or editors will very likely remove the majority of your hard work sooner or later. Lesion ( talk) 14:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Please review WP:3RR, WP:EDITWAR and WP:BRD. Edit warring is a bright line that shouldn't be crossed on Wikipedia because it can result in a block. Please go to the article talk pages to discuss your edits. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Willpolydna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Cinnamon. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
jonkerz
♠ 10:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome, I note your edit on herpes simplex. Please review the guideline for selecting reliable sources for medical content WP:MEDRS. Reviews, ideally systematic reviews/meta analyses published in peer review journals, and mainstream textbooks. Kind regards, Lesion ( talk) 12:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Journal seems ok, have not checked in detail. Issue is this is a primary source. For medical content, Wikipedia uses secondary sources (i.e. reviews, ideally
systematic reviews and
meta analyses) or tertiary sources (i.e. medical textbooks). For this reason, do not tend to keep up with "breaking science", and mainstream view which often lags behind new developments.
Lesion (
talk) 13:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, I disagree. If no secondary or tertiary source is available then this indicates that aspect of a topic is not (yet) notable for the encyclopedia. Much content slips through the net, or exists from historic edits before WP:RS and WP:MEDRS were developed and as strictly enforced. If you wish to edit medical topics on wikipedia, it is advisable to soundly grasp the MEDRS concept of avoiding primary sources, or editors will very likely remove the majority of your hard work sooner or later. Lesion ( talk) 14:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Please review WP:3RR, WP:EDITWAR and WP:BRD. Edit warring is a bright line that shouldn't be crossed on Wikipedia because it can result in a block. Please go to the article talk pages to discuss your edits. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)