- ClueBot NG did not know that the edit was constructive. The robot even undid the worldwide release for The Sims Mobile. Now no one's going to know when will the worldwide release be. Also, iOS is not just iPhone and it's actually iPhone, iPad, etc.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Sims Mobile was changed by Williamwang363 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951139 on 2017-10-29T13:18:37+00:00 .
Thank you.
November 24, 4th level vandalism violation infraction
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Garretka (
talk) 02:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
January 1
Happy New Year and welcome to 2020 and a new decade of improving climate change issues.
January 25
I wish you all a happy Lunar New Year.
I wish you all a happy Valentine's Day on February 14.
Weather predictions
You cannot present a possible future event as fact, especially when it is about the weather. Wikicanada1127 ( talk) 21:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Jellico Mountain moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Jellico Mountain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
b
uidh
e 23:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
April 22
Happy 50th anniversary of Earth Day everyone. Remember to continue protecting our planet from further climate change
April 24, JFK Airport first edit warring warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John F. Kennedy International Airport; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
For your information, the padlocks are only displayed on articles that are protected. If you feel that an article needs to be protected, you should file a request at WP:RFPP. Please do not edit war with bots that are operating correctly. Mjroots ( talk) 05:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
June 11
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! 🐔
Chic
dat
Chicken
Database 11:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
July 31
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 
Williamwang363 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Edits wasn't meant to vandalize Wikipedia pages. I'm so sorry if my edits may have been disruptive, but still I plead that I didn't vandalize. Next time I will know to preview pages first before submitting an edit to avoid edits from becoming disruptive to the Wikipedia community. Can you please unblock me? I'm so sorry Williamwang363 ( talk) 16:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: the block has already expired. Salvio 22:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Jellico Mountain
Hello, Williamwang363. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jellico Mountain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forest Glen station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Hurricane Katrina, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 12:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I removed unsourced material from the article. You re-added it - without an explanation, and without any sources. Care to explain why you did that? It's borderline disruptive editing and can certainly result in you being blocked if you keep it up. JimKaatFan ( talk) 14:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Would you mind giving me an explanation if what I done is disruptive editing or vandalism, because what I done could have also been contributing to edit warring?
Williamwang363 (
talk) 01:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please read
Wikipedia:Citing sources. The text that is directly relevant to this case is "In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article." (emphasis mine)
JimKaatFan (
talk) 22:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for that. Will definitely not forget this time and thank you for the reminder. Williamwang363 ( talk) 23:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please read
Wikipedia:Citing sources. The text that is directly relevant to this case is "In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article." (emphasis mine)
JimKaatFan (
talk) 22:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you removed the {{WMATA type}} template from many of the station pages. Was there a discussion or other consensus reached to remove it? Otherwise it seems like that discussion should be had and the removals reverted. Thanks! Skynxnex ( talk) 23:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is a controversy here. Then who removed a lot of
rapid transit station template from major transfer hubs, such as Metro Center, Gallery Place, and L Enfant Plaza, for instance. We need to get to the bottom of this.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 00:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Huh. I guess I'll have to poke around more to figure out why that template has been removed overtime, since it seems overall useful. I've started a section on the project talk page, I think:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Washington_Metro#Why_has_Template:WMATA_type_been_slowly_removed_from_station_pages?.
Skynxnex (
talk) 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- That is especially true for major transfer hubs. Now without all that, it makes it very ambiguous. When I attempted to add it back, someone would revert it within a few hours. Again, thank you for trying to figure out who is behind all of that mess.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 23:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
Williamwang363 See the project page linked above. I'm still pondering this (and might mean I agree with the removal in the end, I just had originally thought it was a weird mass removal without any discussion--but that isn't true on Pi.'s part) but I think it makes sense to pause and I didn't mean for you to revert/add back a bunch of stuff if there was a reason. I'm a bit confused by you saying
figure out who is behind all of that mess
when before I asked you, you removed it on many pages. So, stop. And discuss on the project page is probably the best action. Skynxnex ( talk) 01:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)- I guess you are right on this one. Thank you for the discussion page anyway. Williamwang363 ( talk) 11:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
Williamwang363 See the project page linked above. I'm still pondering this (and might mean I agree with the removal in the end, I just had originally thought it was a weird mass removal without any discussion--but that isn't true on Pi.'s part) but I think it makes sense to pause and I didn't mean for you to revert/add back a bunch of stuff if there was a reason. I'm a bit confused by you saying
- That is especially true for major transfer hubs. Now without all that, it makes it very ambiguous. When I attempted to add it back, someone would revert it within a few hours. Again, thank you for trying to figure out who is behind all of that mess.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 23:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Huh. I guess I'll have to poke around more to figure out why that template has been removed overtime, since it seems overall useful. I've started a section on the project talk page, I think:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Washington_Metro#Why_has_Template:WMATA_type_been_slowly_removed_from_station_pages?.
Skynxnex (
talk) 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi I saw you left a message on my talk page. There is indeed a valid source covering the changes from WMATA themselves. Plus the name change has been approved for months now, but have yet become official. Here is the source below:
This means the changes have been official but have yet to be updated on Wikipedia and maps. Someone has already did North Bethesda station on this edit here.
Also, I forgot to mention Downtown Largo was approved in January here. Swagging ( talk) 00:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification, and for getting rid of the confusion that I was having earlier. I will promise to not mislead you again. Williamwang363 ( talk) 02:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Why did you add the GMU to the main station name? It is the secondary name. I have fixed it. Fastfoodfanatic ( talk) 16:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I am telling you this because GMU is within the proximity of Vienna station. Williamwang363 ( talk) 01:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- ClueBot NG did not know that the edit was constructive. The robot even undid the worldwide release for The Sims Mobile. Now no one's going to know when will the worldwide release be. Also, iOS is not just iPhone and it's actually iPhone, iPad, etc.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Sims Mobile was changed by Williamwang363 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951139 on 2017-10-29T13:18:37+00:00 .
Thank you.
November 24, 4th level vandalism violation infraction
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Garretka (
talk) 02:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
January 1
Happy New Year and welcome to 2020 and a new decade of improving climate change issues.
January 25
I wish you all a happy Lunar New Year.
I wish you all a happy Valentine's Day on February 14.
Weather predictions
You cannot present a possible future event as fact, especially when it is about the weather. Wikicanada1127 ( talk) 21:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Jellico Mountain moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Jellico Mountain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
b
uidh
e 23:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
April 22
Happy 50th anniversary of Earth Day everyone. Remember to continue protecting our planet from further climate change
April 24, JFK Airport first edit warring warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John F. Kennedy International Airport; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
For your information, the padlocks are only displayed on articles that are protected. If you feel that an article needs to be protected, you should file a request at WP:RFPP. Please do not edit war with bots that are operating correctly. Mjroots ( talk) 05:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
June 11
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! 🐔
Chic
dat
Chicken
Database 11:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
July 31
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Williamwang363 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Edits wasn't meant to vandalize Wikipedia pages. I'm so sorry if my edits may have been disruptive, but still I plead that I didn't vandalize. Next time I will know to preview pages first before submitting an edit to avoid edits from becoming disruptive to the Wikipedia community. Can you please unblock me? I'm so sorry Williamwang363 ( talk) 16:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: the block has already expired. Salvio 22:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Jellico Mountain
Hello, Williamwang363. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jellico Mountain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forest Glen station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Hurricane Katrina, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 12:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I removed unsourced material from the article. You re-added it - without an explanation, and without any sources. Care to explain why you did that? It's borderline disruptive editing and can certainly result in you being blocked if you keep it up. JimKaatFan ( talk) 14:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Would you mind giving me an explanation if what I done is disruptive editing or vandalism, because what I done could have also been contributing to edit warring?
Williamwang363 (
talk) 01:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please read
Wikipedia:Citing sources. The text that is directly relevant to this case is "In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article." (emphasis mine)
JimKaatFan (
talk) 22:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for that. Will definitely not forget this time and thank you for the reminder. Williamwang363 ( talk) 23:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please read
Wikipedia:Citing sources. The text that is directly relevant to this case is "In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article." (emphasis mine)
JimKaatFan (
talk) 22:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you removed the {{WMATA type}} template from many of the station pages. Was there a discussion or other consensus reached to remove it? Otherwise it seems like that discussion should be had and the removals reverted. Thanks! Skynxnex ( talk) 23:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is a controversy here. Then who removed a lot of
rapid transit station template from major transfer hubs, such as Metro Center, Gallery Place, and L Enfant Plaza, for instance. We need to get to the bottom of this.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 00:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Huh. I guess I'll have to poke around more to figure out why that template has been removed overtime, since it seems overall useful. I've started a section on the project talk page, I think:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Washington_Metro#Why_has_Template:WMATA_type_been_slowly_removed_from_station_pages?.
Skynxnex (
talk) 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- That is especially true for major transfer hubs. Now without all that, it makes it very ambiguous. When I attempted to add it back, someone would revert it within a few hours. Again, thank you for trying to figure out who is behind all of that mess.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 23:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
Williamwang363 See the project page linked above. I'm still pondering this (and might mean I agree with the removal in the end, I just had originally thought it was a weird mass removal without any discussion--but that isn't true on Pi.'s part) but I think it makes sense to pause and I didn't mean for you to revert/add back a bunch of stuff if there was a reason. I'm a bit confused by you saying
figure out who is behind all of that mess
when before I asked you, you removed it on many pages. So, stop. And discuss on the project page is probably the best action. Skynxnex ( talk) 01:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)- I guess you are right on this one. Thank you for the discussion page anyway. Williamwang363 ( talk) 11:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @
Williamwang363 See the project page linked above. I'm still pondering this (and might mean I agree with the removal in the end, I just had originally thought it was a weird mass removal without any discussion--but that isn't true on Pi.'s part) but I think it makes sense to pause and I didn't mean for you to revert/add back a bunch of stuff if there was a reason. I'm a bit confused by you saying
- That is especially true for major transfer hubs. Now without all that, it makes it very ambiguous. When I attempted to add it back, someone would revert it within a few hours. Again, thank you for trying to figure out who is behind all of that mess.
Williamwang363 (
talk) 23:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Huh. I guess I'll have to poke around more to figure out why that template has been removed overtime, since it seems overall useful. I've started a section on the project talk page, I think:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Washington_Metro#Why_has_Template:WMATA_type_been_slowly_removed_from_station_pages?.
Skynxnex (
talk) 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi I saw you left a message on my talk page. There is indeed a valid source covering the changes from WMATA themselves. Plus the name change has been approved for months now, but have yet become official. Here is the source below:
This means the changes have been official but have yet to be updated on Wikipedia and maps. Someone has already did North Bethesda station on this edit here.
Also, I forgot to mention Downtown Largo was approved in January here. Swagging ( talk) 00:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification, and for getting rid of the confusion that I was having earlier. I will promise to not mislead you again. Williamwang363 ( talk) 02:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Why did you add the GMU to the main station name? It is the secondary name. I have fixed it. Fastfoodfanatic ( talk) 16:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I am telling you this because GMU is within the proximity of Vienna station. Williamwang363 ( talk) 01:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)