Welcome!
Hello, Wereldburger758, and
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 07:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
hi, thanks for advise, actually i am already using MS Office for spelling check, it do provide a little assistance in grammar but it cant help me in the issue of "style", english language have its own style, i am not a native speaker of english so "style" has always been a problem for me. Since i started writing on wikipedia i have learn a lot on this style stuff and will learn more. Regards الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
It goes like this..... first heraclius sent reinforcement, probably to attack muslims at their rear while they were besieging the city, this reinforcement was checked by Muslim scouts deployed at damascus-emesa road at "Uqab pass" (Saniyyat al uqab) 20 km north of Damascus, a column under Raafai was sent to counter this threat, but Raafai's column proved to be too small and was nearly surrounded, until it was rescued by Khalid's mobile guard which then drove back the byzantine reinforcement north towards emesa. 5000 men were sent with raafai and khalid took a further manpower of 4000 men, thus threatening Muslim's position at damascus in case of a massive sally at any gate. Khalid therefore didnt pursuit the fleeing byzantines at this battle of uqab pass and rather hurried to damascus to press the siege. Hope this will clear the confusion. Regards. الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 10:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I will shroty provide the references to the article. الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 07:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I will take a look at tht article one i am done with damascus's الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 09:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Regards الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 11:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر
Mohammad Adil 15:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 20:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 10:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 09:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 11:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 23:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 15:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Done on each respective page.
Thanks. Lihaas ( talk) 12:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for doing some work on my image... feel free to work on any of mine! QFL 24-7 bla ¤ cntrb ¤ kids ¤ pics ¤ vids 16:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it looks great. Thank you! I see from the messages above that you have done other such work. So:
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
To Wereldburger758/Citypeek for his ace mapwork. Cheers. Saravask 01:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
Thank again! Saravask 01:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the link, I didn't know it existed. I wanted to know how the image looked on the article though; that's why I said I was testing it. But I suppose I could use the Test.svg image to do that and apply it on the article page from now on. EricLeb01 ( Page | Talk) 18:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello,have you received my message on the graphics lab map workshop concerning serbia map? Drax90 ( talk) 15:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
please check map workshop for additional remarks i have made thanks Drax90 ( talk) 07:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello again I left you a message on map workshop :D Drax90 ( talk) 16:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for comment on ShareMap grant page. I tried to fix some misspellings as you suggested . I will be happy if you also add other comments
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:IEG/ShareMap
regards
--
Jkan997 (
talk) 10:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
I also see that you added and removed your endorsement - if you have done this intentionally its fine, but in case of mistake just add it again - I know it is not very easy to be first in public speech :)
In case of any further questions just let me know - opinions of all Wikipedians are important for us
-- Jkan997 ( talk) 21:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the new map! Nyttend ( talk) 13:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
hi Wereldburger758, thank you for your message. I personally favour this one [1]. However, there are some changes that need to be done. Could you please take the same orange colours like in the old map? The right side should be a stronger colour, the left hand very light. In that way you can avoid the white border in between those two parts and draw the international border that is dividing them instead. Could you also add the rivers to it, like in this map File:Badakhshan.svg? The colours should be similar to each other, because the right hand side is the original region. The left hand is a later addition. So orange and yellow would be good. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 10:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Wereldburger758,
A brief response to your observation on the Gaugamela talk page: In a nut shell, the map can be both correct and incorrect depending on which source you choose to accept. There is some ambiguity in the ancient texts.
The first map show the opening phases, in which Darius ordered his wings to try to outflank the Macedonians, it is fairly representative of all three accounts.
The second map is also fairly representative of Arrian's account, which is considered by most classical historians to be the most accurate.
Arrian states that Mazaeus sent about 1,000 Scythian and 2,000 Indian cavalry into the center gap created between the Macedonian right flank and left flank by Alexander's oblique movement on the left (Arr., 3.14.6-8). Yet Diodorus and Curtius are much more vague and can lead readers to conclude that Mazaeus sent the same force around the flank. Diodorus: "Mazaeus...sent off two thousand Indian [and] one thousand Scythian horsemen with orders to ride round the enemy's flank and continue on to their camp (Diod., 17.59.5)." Curtius' account is similar, stating that Mazaeus sent one thousand cavalry "to ride around and plunder the enemy's baggage (Curt., 4.15.5). However, anyone who has even the slightest amount of military bearing or knowledge would be able to conclude that Arrian's account is the most accurate.
The flanking movement that you mentioned is indicated by Arrian, in the very last sentence of 3.14. Arrian states that the right flank was unaware of Darius flight from the battlefield, and were continuing their attack, and had begun a flank attack on Parmenio's left flank troops. This near encirclement is part of what caused Alexander to break of his pursuit of Alexander (Arr., 3.15.1). In this aspect, the second map is correct, the center gap breech is correctly depicted, and the flank attack, which appears to be and encirclement, is correct.
Tank0133 ( talk) 02:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Tank
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Someone took my username and my introduction page and used that on the Wikipedia of Tajikistan: https://tg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80:Wereldburger758
What can I do? Wereldburger758 ( talk) 10:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you again for your answer. Things are more clear now. I know what to do. -- Wereldburger758 ( talk) 05:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Wereldburger758, and
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 07:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
hi, thanks for advise, actually i am already using MS Office for spelling check, it do provide a little assistance in grammar but it cant help me in the issue of "style", english language have its own style, i am not a native speaker of english so "style" has always been a problem for me. Since i started writing on wikipedia i have learn a lot on this style stuff and will learn more. Regards الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
It goes like this..... first heraclius sent reinforcement, probably to attack muslims at their rear while they were besieging the city, this reinforcement was checked by Muslim scouts deployed at damascus-emesa road at "Uqab pass" (Saniyyat al uqab) 20 km north of Damascus, a column under Raafai was sent to counter this threat, but Raafai's column proved to be too small and was nearly surrounded, until it was rescued by Khalid's mobile guard which then drove back the byzantine reinforcement north towards emesa. 5000 men were sent with raafai and khalid took a further manpower of 4000 men, thus threatening Muslim's position at damascus in case of a massive sally at any gate. Khalid therefore didnt pursuit the fleeing byzantines at this battle of uqab pass and rather hurried to damascus to press the siege. Hope this will clear the confusion. Regards. الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 10:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I will shroty provide the references to the article. الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 07:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I will take a look at tht article one i am done with damascus's الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 09:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Regards الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 11:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر
Mohammad Adil 15:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 20:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 10:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 12:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 09:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 11:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 23:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
الله أكبر Mohammad Adil 15:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Done on each respective page.
Thanks. Lihaas ( talk) 12:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for doing some work on my image... feel free to work on any of mine! QFL 24-7 bla ¤ cntrb ¤ kids ¤ pics ¤ vids 16:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it looks great. Thank you! I see from the messages above that you have done other such work. So:
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
To Wereldburger758/Citypeek for his ace mapwork. Cheers. Saravask 01:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
Thank again! Saravask 01:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the link, I didn't know it existed. I wanted to know how the image looked on the article though; that's why I said I was testing it. But I suppose I could use the Test.svg image to do that and apply it on the article page from now on. EricLeb01 ( Page | Talk) 18:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello,have you received my message on the graphics lab map workshop concerning serbia map? Drax90 ( talk) 15:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
please check map workshop for additional remarks i have made thanks Drax90 ( talk) 07:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello again I left you a message on map workshop :D Drax90 ( talk) 16:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for comment on ShareMap grant page. I tried to fix some misspellings as you suggested . I will be happy if you also add other comments
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:IEG/ShareMap
regards
--
Jkan997 (
talk) 10:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
I also see that you added and removed your endorsement - if you have done this intentionally its fine, but in case of mistake just add it again - I know it is not very easy to be first in public speech :)
In case of any further questions just let me know - opinions of all Wikipedians are important for us
-- Jkan997 ( talk) 21:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the new map! Nyttend ( talk) 13:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
hi Wereldburger758, thank you for your message. I personally favour this one [1]. However, there are some changes that need to be done. Could you please take the same orange colours like in the old map? The right side should be a stronger colour, the left hand very light. In that way you can avoid the white border in between those two parts and draw the international border that is dividing them instead. Could you also add the rivers to it, like in this map File:Badakhshan.svg? The colours should be similar to each other, because the right hand side is the original region. The left hand is a later addition. So orange and yellow would be good. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 10:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Wereldburger758,
A brief response to your observation on the Gaugamela talk page: In a nut shell, the map can be both correct and incorrect depending on which source you choose to accept. There is some ambiguity in the ancient texts.
The first map show the opening phases, in which Darius ordered his wings to try to outflank the Macedonians, it is fairly representative of all three accounts.
The second map is also fairly representative of Arrian's account, which is considered by most classical historians to be the most accurate.
Arrian states that Mazaeus sent about 1,000 Scythian and 2,000 Indian cavalry into the center gap created between the Macedonian right flank and left flank by Alexander's oblique movement on the left (Arr., 3.14.6-8). Yet Diodorus and Curtius are much more vague and can lead readers to conclude that Mazaeus sent the same force around the flank. Diodorus: "Mazaeus...sent off two thousand Indian [and] one thousand Scythian horsemen with orders to ride round the enemy's flank and continue on to their camp (Diod., 17.59.5)." Curtius' account is similar, stating that Mazaeus sent one thousand cavalry "to ride around and plunder the enemy's baggage (Curt., 4.15.5). However, anyone who has even the slightest amount of military bearing or knowledge would be able to conclude that Arrian's account is the most accurate.
The flanking movement that you mentioned is indicated by Arrian, in the very last sentence of 3.14. Arrian states that the right flank was unaware of Darius flight from the battlefield, and were continuing their attack, and had begun a flank attack on Parmenio's left flank troops. This near encirclement is part of what caused Alexander to break of his pursuit of Alexander (Arr., 3.15.1). In this aspect, the second map is correct, the center gap breech is correctly depicted, and the flank attack, which appears to be and encirclement, is correct.
Tank0133 ( talk) 02:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Tank
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Wereldburger758. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Someone took my username and my introduction page and used that on the Wikipedia of Tajikistan: https://tg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80:Wereldburger758
What can I do? Wereldburger758 ( talk) 10:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you again for your answer. Things are more clear now. I know what to do. -- Wereldburger758 ( talk) 05:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)