You are very welcome - glad to help. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you have removed the article Strip club from the GAC page with the plans of nominating it for FAC. I also noticed you underwent a recent peer review. Although you have certainly put a lot of hard work into the article, I would advise holding out for another GA review rather than going straight to FAC. At a quick glance, there are still a lot of issues with the article, even by GA standards. For one, there are many statements without citations, which suggests further research is needed. Secondly, some of the sources would not be considered reliable, such as "2001live.com". The captions on the pictures could also use some serious work since they don't sound encyclopedic. Anyway, once you get the article to GA status, feel free to keep working at it and bring it to FAC when its ready. I would love to see the article as a WP:FA someday. – VisionHolder « talk » 22:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, but it is already nominated for FA. It was ignored at GAC, so I just took the feedback I had and ran with it. On the citation comment, just please mark the claims that you are clearly disputing. It might take some hunting and pecking but everything in the article is verifiable. On the FAC, you are welcome to punch holes in it and I'll get back to work... -
Wallanon (
talk) 22:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- BTW, I'm not trying to be a dick with my brief comments. I promised someone a complete overhaul of an article today (which is only day off work since May and will be my last day off work until September), and I haven't accomplished much. When I have time, I will gladly offer more detailed comments and suggestions. But keep in mind that I write in the scientific areas, so I'm a lot more critical of citations and reliable sources. Hopefully someone else will offer some comments shortly and give you something specific to work on. Until I can get back to you and give you the suggestions you deserve, keep up the good work. – VisionHolder « talk » 22:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I added {{ userspace notes}} to User:Wallanon/Scratch. It includes a __NOINDEX__ directive -- which tells search engines not to search and index this page.
I participated in a discussion as to how long contributors' notes should be kept after they have taken a long wikibreak. There was no consensus in that particular discussion. Geo Swan ( talk) 23:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Cheetahs San Diego CA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Wallanon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You are very welcome - glad to help. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you have removed the article Strip club from the GAC page with the plans of nominating it for FAC. I also noticed you underwent a recent peer review. Although you have certainly put a lot of hard work into the article, I would advise holding out for another GA review rather than going straight to FAC. At a quick glance, there are still a lot of issues with the article, even by GA standards. For one, there are many statements without citations, which suggests further research is needed. Secondly, some of the sources would not be considered reliable, such as "2001live.com". The captions on the pictures could also use some serious work since they don't sound encyclopedic. Anyway, once you get the article to GA status, feel free to keep working at it and bring it to FAC when its ready. I would love to see the article as a WP:FA someday. – VisionHolder « talk » 22:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, but it is already nominated for FA. It was ignored at GAC, so I just took the feedback I had and ran with it. On the citation comment, just please mark the claims that you are clearly disputing. It might take some hunting and pecking but everything in the article is verifiable. On the FAC, you are welcome to punch holes in it and I'll get back to work... -
Wallanon (
talk) 22:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- BTW, I'm not trying to be a dick with my brief comments. I promised someone a complete overhaul of an article today (which is only day off work since May and will be my last day off work until September), and I haven't accomplished much. When I have time, I will gladly offer more detailed comments and suggestions. But keep in mind that I write in the scientific areas, so I'm a lot more critical of citations and reliable sources. Hopefully someone else will offer some comments shortly and give you something specific to work on. Until I can get back to you and give you the suggestions you deserve, keep up the good work. – VisionHolder « talk » 22:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I added {{ userspace notes}} to User:Wallanon/Scratch. It includes a __NOINDEX__ directive -- which tells search engines not to search and index this page.
I participated in a discussion as to how long contributors' notes should be kept after they have taken a long wikibreak. There was no consensus in that particular discussion. Geo Swan ( talk) 23:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Cheetahs San Diego CA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Wallanon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)