Welcome!
Hello, Voidocore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
VanTucky
(talk) 19:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the
external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links.
Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
VanTucky
(talk) 19:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the word "claims" is used too much. I edited it out of the biography because to me it does not read well in an article. The Criticism section is, at present in a state of constant flux, with a lot in it that I wish was not there. But because of the RfC, I can't just remove what is in discussion. Kwork 15:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Edits on the Nhat Hanh article
I've noticed that you and Fl1942 appear to be having a difference of opinion about a specific link in this article. In looking at the site that appears to be in contention, I don't see anything about it that would be discouraged by Wikipedia guidelines. I would like to ask that the two of you not change the page again until you've both discussed the issue and stated your reasons on the Talk:Nhat Hanh page. This will help us reach a consensus and help maintain good faith. Thanks! Nightngle 13:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Are you doing this [1]
It is an honest question that deserves an answer. There are all sorts of article on wikipedia that contain no sources whatsoever.This is not to say that they shouldn't be. It only means that strict adherance to rules can be viewed as disruption. Albion moonlight 20:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Voidocore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
VanTucky
(talk) 19:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the
external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links.
Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
VanTucky
(talk) 19:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the word "claims" is used too much. I edited it out of the biography because to me it does not read well in an article. The Criticism section is, at present in a state of constant flux, with a lot in it that I wish was not there. But because of the RfC, I can't just remove what is in discussion. Kwork 15:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Edits on the Nhat Hanh article
I've noticed that you and Fl1942 appear to be having a difference of opinion about a specific link in this article. In looking at the site that appears to be in contention, I don't see anything about it that would be discouraged by Wikipedia guidelines. I would like to ask that the two of you not change the page again until you've both discussed the issue and stated your reasons on the Talk:Nhat Hanh page. This will help us reach a consensus and help maintain good faith. Thanks! Nightngle 13:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Are you doing this [1]
It is an honest question that deserves an answer. There are all sorts of article on wikipedia that contain no sources whatsoever.This is not to say that they shouldn't be. It only means that strict adherance to rules can be viewed as disruption. Albion moonlight 20:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)