|
The Original Barnstar |
| For having the courage and fortitude to move Female Genital Mutilation. Jim1138 ( talk) 09:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Vietminh, just to let you know that I withdrew the FAC nomination for FGM because of the objections, and to say how much I appreciated your insight and support regarding a subject that is not easy to work on. Best, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 00:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Someone requested FGM to FGC move. fyi Jim1138 ( talk) 04:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good comment on FGM! I have been reluctantly reverting a number of changes. Jim1138 ( talk) 17:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Seems to have disappeared on FGM. Should it be replaced? Was it ever there? Jim1138 ( talk) 23:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ok, I messed up the table. i was trying to add "Orchid Project". Could you please help? The only reference i found was this blog so I don't know if it cuts it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/06/female-genital-cutting-africa-senegal Cherylbarksdale ( talk) 05:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
FYI: ran into these doing something else. Seen them? [1] Jim1138 ( talk) 07:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hope your classes went well. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome back. When you last reverted fgm, you did not replace the following: "While, particularly in Africa, individual Muslims, Christians, and Ethiopian Jews practise FGM,<ref name=toubia1995/> it is not a requirement of any religious observance." Should it be replaced? Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 02:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For having the courage and fortitude to move Female Genital Mutilation. Jim1138 ( talk) 09:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Vietminh, just to let you know that I withdrew the FAC nomination for FGM because of the objections, and to say how much I appreciated your insight and support regarding a subject that is not easy to work on. Best, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 00:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Someone requested FGM to FGC move. fyi Jim1138 ( talk) 04:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good comment on FGM! I have been reluctantly reverting a number of changes. Jim1138 ( talk) 17:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Seems to have disappeared on FGM. Should it be replaced? Was it ever there? Jim1138 ( talk) 23:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ok, I messed up the table. i was trying to add "Orchid Project". Could you please help? The only reference i found was this blog so I don't know if it cuts it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/06/female-genital-cutting-africa-senegal Cherylbarksdale ( talk) 05:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
FYI: ran into these doing something else. Seen them? [1] Jim1138 ( talk) 07:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hope your classes went well. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome back. When you last reverted fgm, you did not replace the following: "While, particularly in Africa, individual Muslims, Christians, and Ethiopian Jews practise FGM,<ref name=toubia1995/> it is not a requirement of any religious observance." Should it be replaced? Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 02:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)