Hello, Umno22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Replacement of Serbo-Croatian
If you deem the term objectionable, then discuss it instead of editing it out. Bring the question to talk:History of the Slavic languages, for example. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 09:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you really expect mass replacements by an expert from nowhere to be tolerated? Can you imagine such condition elsewhere: not necessarily in an encyclopedia, but in any established community but anarchy? Stop your WP:PoV pushing now and either withdraw or start a discussion. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 10:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
The Serbo-Croatian Languge seized to exist in 1991. Now the stokavki dialect of Croatian forms the standard Croatian laguage and the Serbian is Serbian. The wrongs in this article go so far that one of the references, namely: Matasović, Ranko (2008), Poredbenopovijesna gramatika hrvatskoga jezika, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, ISBN 978-953-150-840-7 is said to be written in Serbo-Croatian. It is written in Croatian and talks about Croatian grammar.
Stop living in the past guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umno22 ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Start to look at the article’s title. It is
- History, dammit. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 10:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
The article mentions "modern Serbo-Croatian", something like this does not exists. Modern languages are Serbian, Croatian and Bosnian. The article has to be updated. Also Čakavski is not a historical thing. It still exists. It is a modern day Croatian dialect, the article states this wrong. And as I already said, even has the language of a reference from 2008 is wrong.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring #User:Umno22 reported by User:Incnis Mrsi (Result: ) regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Incnis Mrsi (
talk) 14:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Umno22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Replacement of Serbo-Croatian
If you deem the term objectionable, then discuss it instead of editing it out. Bring the question to talk:History of the Slavic languages, for example. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 09:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you really expect mass replacements by an expert from nowhere to be tolerated? Can you imagine such condition elsewhere: not necessarily in an encyclopedia, but in any established community but anarchy? Stop your WP:PoV pushing now and either withdraw or start a discussion. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 10:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
The Serbo-Croatian Languge seized to exist in 1991. Now the stokavki dialect of Croatian forms the standard Croatian laguage and the Serbian is Serbian. The wrongs in this article go so far that one of the references, namely: Matasović, Ranko (2008), Poredbenopovijesna gramatika hrvatskoga jezika, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, ISBN 978-953-150-840-7 is said to be written in Serbo-Croatian. It is written in Croatian and talks about Croatian grammar.
Stop living in the past guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umno22 ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Start to look at the article’s title. It is
- History, dammit. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 10:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
The article mentions "modern Serbo-Croatian", something like this does not exists. Modern languages are Serbian, Croatian and Bosnian. The article has to be updated. Also Čakavski is not a historical thing. It still exists. It is a modern day Croatian dialect, the article states this wrong. And as I already said, even has the language of a reference from 2008 is wrong.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring #User:Umno22 reported by User:Incnis Mrsi (Result: ) regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Incnis Mrsi (
talk) 14:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)