Welcome!
Hello, Ugeeeen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as DaDaBIK, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 13:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The article DaDaBIK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails the general notability guideline.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 13:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Message added 13:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nomination of DaDaBIK for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaDaBIK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ST47 ( talk) 18:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugeeeen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SunDawn talk 05:54, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Ugeeeen. I've closed the sockpuppet investigation without action, based on the assumption that these were unrelated accounts that had been invited here to oppose deletion. That's not against our sockpuppetry policy, but it is against another of our rules: Wikipedia:Canvassing. Since you were the first one to comment there, and the one who wrote the article, absent evidence of the contrary I'm going to assume that you were the one who canvassed people to comment. Please understand that if you again try to influence the outcome of a Wikipedia discussion through requests elsewhere, you may be blocked from editing.
There are also a number of things that make me think you likely are involved in DaDaBIK. Is that the case? If so, please understand that conflict-of-interest (COI) editing is strongly discouraged. Please see Wikipedia:Conflicts of interest or Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Again, continued COI editing can lead to a block.
Thanks. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 01:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Ugeeeen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as DaDaBIK, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 13:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The article DaDaBIK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails the general notability guideline.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 13:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Message added 13:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nomination of DaDaBIK for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaDaBIK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ST47 ( talk) 18:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugeeeen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SunDawn talk 05:54, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Ugeeeen. I've closed the sockpuppet investigation without action, based on the assumption that these were unrelated accounts that had been invited here to oppose deletion. That's not against our sockpuppetry policy, but it is against another of our rules: Wikipedia:Canvassing. Since you were the first one to comment there, and the one who wrote the article, absent evidence of the contrary I'm going to assume that you were the one who canvassed people to comment. Please understand that if you again try to influence the outcome of a Wikipedia discussion through requests elsewhere, you may be blocked from editing.
There are also a number of things that make me think you likely are involved in DaDaBIK. Is that the case? If so, please understand that conflict-of-interest (COI) editing is strongly discouraged. Please see Wikipedia:Conflicts of interest or Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Again, continued COI editing can lead to a block.
Thanks. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 01:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)