This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have no idea about that edit. I just refreshed my IP and was assigned this IP. I assume it was someone else. 136.158.57.143 ( talk) 11:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, only 2 Minutes after creation of an article is by far too quick for speedy deletion, like you did here Georg Hinrichsen - we usually have to wait per Wikipedia:NPP Policy 10 minutes, some sysops say better 15-30 minutes before nominating. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 08:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey mate, thanks for helping me finish the article on the 2021 Dunedin Countdown stabbing. Just a heads up- there have been no deaths confirmed yet, so we'll hold off adding it to the category for deaths by stabbing, shall we? Cheers.-- Aubernas ( talk) 14:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The WP:REFILL app is apparently not going towards your standards which is why the edit to Doki Doki Literature Club! seems to be so "wrong". Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 01:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Chase Community Independents Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
unambiguous promo, not notable
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tame ( talk) 14:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
I saw some edits made to a new page I created. I respectfully understand some of the issues brought up and do want to give respect to an editor such as yourself who has been working at this longer than I have. I wish to invite you to have a discussion with me so that we can come to a consensus (giving full respect to the definition) with regards to what changes can be respectfully made to the article while being fully understood on the competent points I make. I tried to improve additional sources and even included one that is not conservative to show explicitly that not all my sources will be biased. The big reason for my biased sources is finding that most sources covering him are biased (which if we are fair applies to most news in certain topics or aspects). I also read the article on Reliable Sources/Perennial sources that make valid some of my points. Once again, I hope we can come to a consensus, work out a compromise, praise the other on good points brought up, willing to admit when we are wrong, and work together to create an even better page :)
Thank you for taking the time to read this Updatewithfacts ( talk) 01:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Show me how "the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion and/or blanked the page in good faith." -- A21sauce ( talk) 13:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Emil Şahin, delete the deletion process, we made corrections in the article and gave references, please keep this in mind Rza835 ( talk) 09:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
As I got the request from you regarding the deletion of the page TruthUnfold which you claimed to be the self beneficiary. However, google allowed me as the renowned founder of the news agency. The news agency is however in my interest but the reason for the article was to serve the interaction of media with the audience and Wikipedia is the source that helps best. Also, it does not fall under the given guidelines of Wikipedia until or unless it just benefits me. It is in the interest of every reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Israr Ahmad 07 ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I did not get the Description rom Amazon. It was actually the Original Description from The Novel's Author, Thomas Dixon Jr. Written in 1916.
I placed it there so I could have Time to Write the Summary.
The Page did not violate Copyright Law as the Description is in The Public Domain.
SKWills ( talk) 22:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Twotwofourtysix I hope, you're doing well. I came across these article Amaatiikhan. While I believe the person is not notable, so I have replaced the prod template with csd. If you think, I did a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. Thanks, stay safe. -- C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for reaching out. I work for this specific candidate and they would prefer to at least have his most recent elected position listed instead of the 2017 candidacy. I attempted to cite it with an outside source previously, as I made changes earlier in the week, but I am really new at this, so I apologize for the confusion and if it inconvenienced you in any way. This is the link showing that he is the Treasurer of the Cuyahoga Soil & Water Conservation District:. [1] I can go back and change it or find another source if necessary. I appreciate any help you can provide! Aubreykitty4 ( talk) 13:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
template on the article talk page instead. Please read more on the guideline page linked above. As to the source you provided above, I will check it later. Thanks. —
twotwofourtysix(My
talk page and
contributions) 13:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)References
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have no idea about that edit. I just refreshed my IP and was assigned this IP. I assume it was someone else. 136.158.57.143 ( talk) 11:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, only 2 Minutes after creation of an article is by far too quick for speedy deletion, like you did here Georg Hinrichsen - we usually have to wait per Wikipedia:NPP Policy 10 minutes, some sysops say better 15-30 minutes before nominating. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 08:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey mate, thanks for helping me finish the article on the 2021 Dunedin Countdown stabbing. Just a heads up- there have been no deaths confirmed yet, so we'll hold off adding it to the category for deaths by stabbing, shall we? Cheers.-- Aubernas ( talk) 14:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
The WP:REFILL app is apparently not going towards your standards which is why the edit to Doki Doki Literature Club! seems to be so "wrong". Qwertyxp2000 ( talk | contribs) 01:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Chase Community Independents Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
unambiguous promo, not notable
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tame ( talk) 14:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
I saw some edits made to a new page I created. I respectfully understand some of the issues brought up and do want to give respect to an editor such as yourself who has been working at this longer than I have. I wish to invite you to have a discussion with me so that we can come to a consensus (giving full respect to the definition) with regards to what changes can be respectfully made to the article while being fully understood on the competent points I make. I tried to improve additional sources and even included one that is not conservative to show explicitly that not all my sources will be biased. The big reason for my biased sources is finding that most sources covering him are biased (which if we are fair applies to most news in certain topics or aspects). I also read the article on Reliable Sources/Perennial sources that make valid some of my points. Once again, I hope we can come to a consensus, work out a compromise, praise the other on good points brought up, willing to admit when we are wrong, and work together to create an even better page :)
Thank you for taking the time to read this Updatewithfacts ( talk) 01:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Show me how "the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion and/or blanked the page in good faith." -- A21sauce ( talk) 13:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Emil Şahin, delete the deletion process, we made corrections in the article and gave references, please keep this in mind Rza835 ( talk) 09:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
As I got the request from you regarding the deletion of the page TruthUnfold which you claimed to be the self beneficiary. However, google allowed me as the renowned founder of the news agency. The news agency is however in my interest but the reason for the article was to serve the interaction of media with the audience and Wikipedia is the source that helps best. Also, it does not fall under the given guidelines of Wikipedia until or unless it just benefits me. It is in the interest of every reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Israr Ahmad 07 ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I did not get the Description rom Amazon. It was actually the Original Description from The Novel's Author, Thomas Dixon Jr. Written in 1916.
I placed it there so I could have Time to Write the Summary.
The Page did not violate Copyright Law as the Description is in The Public Domain.
SKWills ( talk) 22:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Twotwofourtysix I hope, you're doing well. I came across these article Amaatiikhan. While I believe the person is not notable, so I have replaced the prod template with csd. If you think, I did a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. Thanks, stay safe. -- C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for reaching out. I work for this specific candidate and they would prefer to at least have his most recent elected position listed instead of the 2017 candidacy. I attempted to cite it with an outside source previously, as I made changes earlier in the week, but I am really new at this, so I apologize for the confusion and if it inconvenienced you in any way. This is the link showing that he is the Treasurer of the Cuyahoga Soil & Water Conservation District:. [1] I can go back and change it or find another source if necessary. I appreciate any help you can provide! Aubreykitty4 ( talk) 13:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
template on the article talk page instead. Please read more on the guideline page linked above. As to the source you provided above, I will check it later. Thanks. —
twotwofourtysix(My
talk page and
contributions) 13:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)References