Leave me a message. Tropcho ( talk) 17:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
So 'emigrate to Bulgaria' means they have left X country and immigrated to Bulgaria? That's what the definition on oxforddictionaries.com seems to imply. -- Svip pong 18:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it would appear to be so. Although, the source used says 'immigrated to Bulgaria', I wonder if that language shouldn't be used instead, as it is more clear and less ambiguous. -- Svip pong 18:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
This came up on the talk page of the article on Julian Schwinger Talk:Julian Schwinger. You can say
- 'immigrated to Bulgaria' (writer explicitly adopting perspective of being in Bulgaria)
- 'emigrated to Bulgaria' (writer implicitly in Country X)
- 'immigrated from Country X' (writer strongly implying he is in Bulgaria)
- 'emigrated from Country X' (writer explicitly adopting perspective of being in Country X)
The common problem of all of all of these is that to greater or lesser degrees, they imply the perspective of the writer. It is better to use the neutral term 'migrated', which implies nothing about the locale of the writer, and is therefore good wikipedia.
You can then write 'migrated from Country X' or 'migrated to Bulgaria' or, of course 'migrated from Country X to Bulgaria' according to which aspects of the action are important. This leaves the focus firmly with the subject and not with the author. Which is just the way it should be. 78.32.68.244 ( talk) 20:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
CHAPTER CXX the oldest documents about Bulgaria and Kubrat are from the chronics of JOhn of Nikiu in early 600 AD:
47. And when the inhabitants of Byzantium heard this news, they said: 'This project is concerned with Kubratos, chief of the Huns, the nephew of Organa, who was baptized in the city of Constantinople, and received into the Christian community in his childhood and had grown up in the imperial palace.'
CHAPTER LXXXIX
74. But immediately on his return to the emperor, the
latter removed him from his command, and appointed in his
room another general, named Cyril, of the province of
Illyria. 75. And he also gave battle to Vitalian, and
there was great slaughter on both sides. Cyril the general
retired into the city named Odyssus, and stayed there while
Vitalian withdrew into the province of Bulgaria.
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/nikiu2_chronicle.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.70.251.91 ( talk) 23:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
|
Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Здравейте приятели,
Искам да споделя с вас списък с редактори в уикипедия които организирано или не, с малки и големи стъпки се опитват да принизят българската история, като крайната цел е да докаже че видете ли няма връзка между Първото и Второто Българско царство, а ако това не може то поне да се принизят постиженията на тези царства и да се преувеличат несгодите им. Ако имате възможност наглеждайте тези потребители, те са тук постоянно и са непрекъснато активни:
- Cplakidas – действа навсякъде и се опитва да принизи всичко Българско виж страницата Rus Invasion of Bulgaria и Byzantine Bulgarian Wars 970-1018
- Dr.K – същия като Cplakidas, обикновенно действат заедно
- Tourbillon – истински българомразец, съботира всичко Българско иска да премахне връзката между днешна България и старите царства, кирилицата не е Бългрска и прочее. Само вижте talk на страницата на България.
- Future Perfect at Sunrise – същия като тourbillon
- Chipmunkdavis – същия като тourbillon
- Jingiby – същия като тourbillon
Разпрострянявайте този списък, за да се знаят тези. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoomzoom34 ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
My friend, the clergy of the Roman Empire (Byzantium) was calling themselves Romans not Greeks. There is no source from the 10th or 11th century that refers to them as Greeks. Calling Byzantium anything by Roman and its inhabitants anything by Romans is a modern twisted product... Jrmichaa ( talk) 22:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of StopHam (organization)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on StopHam (organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden ( talk) 12:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stefan I of Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
"With this revert, you've started an edit war. As you may know, edit warring is against the rules of wikipedia. Before proceeding with further reverts, use this talk page (or mine) to clarify the issue. In case it wasn't clear why I restored the content you removed earlier, I did it because the content you removed in no way violates WP:POINT (which you referred to as justification for your edit) and is perfectly acceptable talk page content. Perhaps it might help if you read WP:POINT again. Continued warring will be reported."
Sorry; WP:POiNT ? Slovenski Volk ( talk) 07:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Bulgarian Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Slavic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Leave me a message. Tropcho ( talk) 17:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
So 'emigrate to Bulgaria' means they have left X country and immigrated to Bulgaria? That's what the definition on oxforddictionaries.com seems to imply. -- Svip pong 18:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it would appear to be so. Although, the source used says 'immigrated to Bulgaria', I wonder if that language shouldn't be used instead, as it is more clear and less ambiguous. -- Svip pong 18:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
This came up on the talk page of the article on Julian Schwinger Talk:Julian Schwinger. You can say
- 'immigrated to Bulgaria' (writer explicitly adopting perspective of being in Bulgaria)
- 'emigrated to Bulgaria' (writer implicitly in Country X)
- 'immigrated from Country X' (writer strongly implying he is in Bulgaria)
- 'emigrated from Country X' (writer explicitly adopting perspective of being in Country X)
The common problem of all of all of these is that to greater or lesser degrees, they imply the perspective of the writer. It is better to use the neutral term 'migrated', which implies nothing about the locale of the writer, and is therefore good wikipedia.
You can then write 'migrated from Country X' or 'migrated to Bulgaria' or, of course 'migrated from Country X to Bulgaria' according to which aspects of the action are important. This leaves the focus firmly with the subject and not with the author. Which is just the way it should be. 78.32.68.244 ( talk) 20:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
CHAPTER CXX the oldest documents about Bulgaria and Kubrat are from the chronics of JOhn of Nikiu in early 600 AD:
47. And when the inhabitants of Byzantium heard this news, they said: 'This project is concerned with Kubratos, chief of the Huns, the nephew of Organa, who was baptized in the city of Constantinople, and received into the Christian community in his childhood and had grown up in the imperial palace.'
CHAPTER LXXXIX
74. But immediately on his return to the emperor, the
latter removed him from his command, and appointed in his
room another general, named Cyril, of the province of
Illyria. 75. And he also gave battle to Vitalian, and
there was great slaughter on both sides. Cyril the general
retired into the city named Odyssus, and stayed there while
Vitalian withdrew into the province of Bulgaria.
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/nikiu2_chronicle.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.70.251.91 ( talk) 23:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
|
Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Здравейте приятели,
Искам да споделя с вас списък с редактори в уикипедия които организирано или не, с малки и големи стъпки се опитват да принизят българската история, като крайната цел е да докаже че видете ли няма връзка между Първото и Второто Българско царство, а ако това не може то поне да се принизят постиженията на тези царства и да се преувеличат несгодите им. Ако имате възможност наглеждайте тези потребители, те са тук постоянно и са непрекъснато активни:
- Cplakidas – действа навсякъде и се опитва да принизи всичко Българско виж страницата Rus Invasion of Bulgaria и Byzantine Bulgarian Wars 970-1018
- Dr.K – същия като Cplakidas, обикновенно действат заедно
- Tourbillon – истински българомразец, съботира всичко Българско иска да премахне връзката между днешна България и старите царства, кирилицата не е Бългрска и прочее. Само вижте talk на страницата на България.
- Future Perfect at Sunrise – същия като тourbillon
- Chipmunkdavis – същия като тourbillon
- Jingiby – същия като тourbillon
Разпрострянявайте този списък, за да се знаят тези. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoomzoom34 ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
My friend, the clergy of the Roman Empire (Byzantium) was calling themselves Romans not Greeks. There is no source from the 10th or 11th century that refers to them as Greeks. Calling Byzantium anything by Roman and its inhabitants anything by Romans is a modern twisted product... Jrmichaa ( talk) 22:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of StopHam (organization)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on StopHam (organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden ( talk) 12:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stefan I of Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
"With this revert, you've started an edit war. As you may know, edit warring is against the rules of wikipedia. Before proceeding with further reverts, use this talk page (or mine) to clarify the issue. In case it wasn't clear why I restored the content you removed earlier, I did it because the content you removed in no way violates WP:POINT (which you referred to as justification for your edit) and is perfectly acceptable talk page content. Perhaps it might help if you read WP:POINT again. Continued warring will be reported."
Sorry; WP:POiNT ? Slovenski Volk ( talk) 07:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Bulgarian Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Slavic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Tropcho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)