This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It just didn't seem notable to me. They're mentioned in the synopsis as it is, and as opposed to the recurring characters that are mentioned in continuity (which, I feel, may be better left out of the plot synopsis) they are only linked to preious Judoon appearances by the species, not the plot or the specific Judoon seen. I won't contest a reversion though. U-Mos ( talk) 18:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, it seems ok now, I hope you agree, thank you for presenting the citations that asserted the notability of the addition. Regards. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
in my day to day life, I use the word "moron" freely and meant with out (much) malice? It's a bad habit picked up from a lecturer. I'll cool it on here.~ Zythe Talk to me! 23:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please verify that user:Treasurytag is an alternate account of yours and not an impersonation. Thanks - My76Strat talk 14:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
People should note that I have just created TreasuryTagg ( talk · contribs) with a scrambled password, since that seems to be one likely future guise my 'new friend' may attempt. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Regent─╢ 14:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Please read WP:BITE. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
This post to WP:VPP is considered canvassing, specifically it is a form of campaigning. It does not matter that you did not include a link to the AfD itself, this still falls afoul of Wikipedia:Canvassing#Inappropriate notification which specifically includes: "Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed." Your technique isn't novel or a new idea. Please don't do this again. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Great picture. Could you add a source as to where you found it? Also, it should be moved to Commons. Cheers, postdlf ( talk) 16:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Good to see you went and did the WP:Editor review, but you could also use {{ Editor review}} template or the {{ Editor review sticker}} to advertise the fact. The ER page is a bit low traffic, and that would help ensure you actually get some feedback. Rd232 talk 20:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
The page William paul shao looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification? SPhilbrick T 16:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Which one is the one that is alluded to from VP? All the other posters seemed to know it. TCO ( talk) 22:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi - you reverted this edit [1] as vandalism when it clearly isn't - the editor has all of four edits and it looks like he was making a good faith attempt to draw attention to the fact the statement in question might not be true - a more experienced editor would probably have marked it "citation needed". You then issued an "only warning" for vandalism. Did you misclick something while using Twinkle? Exxolon ( talk) 15:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Please try to be more civil in discussions. "He must either be incompetent or intentionally disruptive" are not the only options when people disagree with you. Insinuating that I can't read is also ridiculous and uncivil. — BQZip01 — talk 18:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Just an FYI, I've no desire to revert your edit, but group photos of leaders at summits are called "family photos". It may sound twee, but I'm afraid that's how they're referred to. You can see its official use here, here and here.- J.Logan` t: 19:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was considering deleting this article but noticed that the page creator had not been notified of the speedy. Was this a TW error? Fæ ( talk) 08:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I feel I owe you an apology. You were right, she is unfriendly and unthankful. -- 87.79.226.158 ( talk) 09:19, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I know--but you know what I was saying. You and Sarek practically cohabitate at ANI (sorry, couldn't resist), and it's perfectly within reason to assume that Sarek followed the link to the AfD you placed there, as I did. You two have enough marital difficulties already (sorry, couldn't resist, again) and little barbs don't help. As for the AfD, thanks for doing that legwork. There's probably a real interesting article in those references you dug up. Drmies ( talk) 19:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello You'll probably have noticed that TT has opened an editor review (link is at the top of this page). You may well be wishing to contribute, but, like User:Exxolon, be unsure how to phrase things without causing disruption. TT seems to genuinely want to reduce the heat around his editing. Further, he has pledged not to edit the ER page again, so there'll only be heat if you apply it yourself.
Simple (wise) advice from User:SarekOfVulcan:
Simple advice from me:
If anyone finds that useful or helpful, I'm delighted. If it ultimately works and thereby helps improve Wikipedia, that's best of all. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It just didn't seem notable to me. They're mentioned in the synopsis as it is, and as opposed to the recurring characters that are mentioned in continuity (which, I feel, may be better left out of the plot synopsis) they are only linked to preious Judoon appearances by the species, not the plot or the specific Judoon seen. I won't contest a reversion though. U-Mos ( talk) 18:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, it seems ok now, I hope you agree, thank you for presenting the citations that asserted the notability of the addition. Regards. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
in my day to day life, I use the word "moron" freely and meant with out (much) malice? It's a bad habit picked up from a lecturer. I'll cool it on here.~ Zythe Talk to me! 23:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please verify that user:Treasurytag is an alternate account of yours and not an impersonation. Thanks - My76Strat talk 14:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
People should note that I have just created TreasuryTagg ( talk · contribs) with a scrambled password, since that seems to be one likely future guise my 'new friend' may attempt. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Regent─╢ 14:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Please read WP:BITE. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
This post to WP:VPP is considered canvassing, specifically it is a form of campaigning. It does not matter that you did not include a link to the AfD itself, this still falls afoul of Wikipedia:Canvassing#Inappropriate notification which specifically includes: "Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed." Your technique isn't novel or a new idea. Please don't do this again. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 22:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Great picture. Could you add a source as to where you found it? Also, it should be moved to Commons. Cheers, postdlf ( talk) 16:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Good to see you went and did the WP:Editor review, but you could also use {{ Editor review}} template or the {{ Editor review sticker}} to advertise the fact. The ER page is a bit low traffic, and that would help ensure you actually get some feedback. Rd232 talk 20:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
The page William paul shao looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification? SPhilbrick T 16:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Which one is the one that is alluded to from VP? All the other posters seemed to know it. TCO ( talk) 22:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi - you reverted this edit [1] as vandalism when it clearly isn't - the editor has all of four edits and it looks like he was making a good faith attempt to draw attention to the fact the statement in question might not be true - a more experienced editor would probably have marked it "citation needed". You then issued an "only warning" for vandalism. Did you misclick something while using Twinkle? Exxolon ( talk) 15:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Please try to be more civil in discussions. "He must either be incompetent or intentionally disruptive" are not the only options when people disagree with you. Insinuating that I can't read is also ridiculous and uncivil. — BQZip01 — talk 18:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Just an FYI, I've no desire to revert your edit, but group photos of leaders at summits are called "family photos". It may sound twee, but I'm afraid that's how they're referred to. You can see its official use here, here and here.- J.Logan` t: 19:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was considering deleting this article but noticed that the page creator had not been notified of the speedy. Was this a TW error? Fæ ( talk) 08:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I feel I owe you an apology. You were right, she is unfriendly and unthankful. -- 87.79.226.158 ( talk) 09:19, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I know--but you know what I was saying. You and Sarek practically cohabitate at ANI (sorry, couldn't resist), and it's perfectly within reason to assume that Sarek followed the link to the AfD you placed there, as I did. You two have enough marital difficulties already (sorry, couldn't resist, again) and little barbs don't help. As for the AfD, thanks for doing that legwork. There's probably a real interesting article in those references you dug up. Drmies ( talk) 19:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello You'll probably have noticed that TT has opened an editor review (link is at the top of this page). You may well be wishing to contribute, but, like User:Exxolon, be unsure how to phrase things without causing disruption. TT seems to genuinely want to reduce the heat around his editing. Further, he has pledged not to edit the ER page again, so there'll only be heat if you apply it yourself.
Simple (wise) advice from User:SarekOfVulcan:
Simple advice from me:
If anyone finds that useful or helpful, I'm delighted. If it ultimately works and thereby helps improve Wikipedia, that's best of all. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)