|
Thanks for your message! In future it's probably best to request page unprotection here where it'll probably get a quicker response. Which article was it? -- Alex ( Talk) 21:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
I removed this text from calculus:
Leibniz and Newton both were working diligently on the founding principles of calculus. Newton had skipped the first step of Calculus that required the theory of limits to further progress his own work. Incidentally, Gottfried Leibniz was presenting the theory of limits at a convention Newton was attending. Leibniz had advanced Gauss’s mathematical theories to where Newton was stumped, but no further. Isaac Newton then took the breakthroughs by Leibniz and incorporated it with his own work. Thus the basis of calculus was founded. History credits Isaac Newton with the discovery of calculus since he published his finds first. Calculus was thus discovered "independently" with some "borrowing" of ideas.
This is wrong. No such convention took place, Gauss lived after Leibniz and Newton, Newton did not publish first, and history does not credit only Newton. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. -- Jitse Niesen ( talk) 01:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 03:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your message! In future it's probably best to request page unprotection here where it'll probably get a quicker response. Which article was it? -- Alex ( Talk) 21:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
I removed this text from calculus:
Leibniz and Newton both were working diligently on the founding principles of calculus. Newton had skipped the first step of Calculus that required the theory of limits to further progress his own work. Incidentally, Gottfried Leibniz was presenting the theory of limits at a convention Newton was attending. Leibniz had advanced Gauss’s mathematical theories to where Newton was stumped, but no further. Isaac Newton then took the breakthroughs by Leibniz and incorporated it with his own work. Thus the basis of calculus was founded. History credits Isaac Newton with the discovery of calculus since he published his finds first. Calculus was thus discovered "independently" with some "borrowing" of ideas.
This is wrong. No such convention took place, Gauss lived after Leibniz and Newton, Newton did not publish first, and history does not credit only Newton. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. -- Jitse Niesen ( talk) 01:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 03:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)