Do not edit this page; it is an archive of past discussions. If you would like to start a new discussion or continue a previous one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ Tol
At ---Twinkle--- preformence table they say at line one : '''boxes checked will not be desplayed'''
does this count for the rest of the table or just the line indecated.
흋ㅎ흋 User:Darkdeath-2흋ㅎ흋 02:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
New to NPP, just curious. Is there a reason why, despite AfC accepting this with NPR, that this ended up in the NPP queue? Nothing in the log indicates unreview. I've marked it as reviewed. Sennecaster ( Chat) 16:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you had approved the AfC submission for this article. I am not sure if you are aware of this, but the article is largely reliant on a single source that is provided by the university itself. Would it have change your decision to approve the article then? – robertsky ( talk) 17:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I know what I'm talking about, because I've met the guy. He is my cadre. He literally has the name of someone famous, so I don't see why he can't be mentioned. You know what I'm saying?? Please consider my words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korinalay101 ( talk • contribs) 02:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have oversighted some material from the history of your common.js file, per a report to the oversight team. Many thanks
,what does tha mean
흋ㅎ흋 User:Darkdeath-2흋ㅎ흋 22:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Are you a real person? -- Bingusmannn ( talk) 18:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
how often or how much time do you spend on wikipedia? -- Bingusmannn ( talk) 18:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Howdy. Request that you keep in mind, that there's also the article List of vice presidents of the United States, not to mention other lists of American officials. Perhaps you should open an RFC covering all those articles, at the appropriate WikiProject. Trying to push such 'big' changes boldly, may only create tension. GoodDay ( talk) 19:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Happy template editing! ~ TheresNoTime ( to explain!) 05:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for all your recent work at BOTREQ. The table of contents on that page uses Category:Wikipedia bot operators to determine the "last botop editor" column, and I think you definitely qualify as one. So if you felt like using {{ User bot owner}}, {{ User wikipedia/Botop}}, or that category directly, I think that might make the table a little more accurate. Happy botting! Enterprisey ( talk!) 09:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Tol. Hope all is well. :)
Just a quick SPI clerk note: Please don't notify people that others have filed SPIs against them. Really even filers shouldn't do that, but if the filer chooses not to (the correct decision 99% of the time), it's best to leave the decision to a clerk, patrolling admin, or CU. Really the only reason we need subjects' participation at SPI is if there's confirmation (by CU or behavior) that someone has engaged in the alleged behavior, but a possible AGF explanation as to why. Otherwise, notifying someone just tends to attract a lot of bluster and turn SPI into mini-ANI. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 16:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Draft:Elastic chewing gum was not accepted due to the lack of reliable external sources. May I ask which statements in the article should be backed up with external sources? Peer-18 ( talk) 22:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Do not edit this page; it is an archive of past discussions. If you would like to start a new discussion or continue a previous one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ Tol
At ---Twinkle--- preformence table they say at line one : '''boxes checked will not be desplayed'''
does this count for the rest of the table or just the line indecated.
흋ㅎ흋 User:Darkdeath-2흋ㅎ흋 02:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
New to NPP, just curious. Is there a reason why, despite AfC accepting this with NPR, that this ended up in the NPP queue? Nothing in the log indicates unreview. I've marked it as reviewed. Sennecaster ( Chat) 16:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you had approved the AfC submission for this article. I am not sure if you are aware of this, but the article is largely reliant on a single source that is provided by the university itself. Would it have change your decision to approve the article then? – robertsky ( talk) 17:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I know what I'm talking about, because I've met the guy. He is my cadre. He literally has the name of someone famous, so I don't see why he can't be mentioned. You know what I'm saying?? Please consider my words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korinalay101 ( talk • contribs) 02:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have oversighted some material from the history of your common.js file, per a report to the oversight team. Many thanks
,what does tha mean
흋ㅎ흋 User:Darkdeath-2흋ㅎ흋 22:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Are you a real person? -- Bingusmannn ( talk) 18:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
how often or how much time do you spend on wikipedia? -- Bingusmannn ( talk) 18:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Howdy. Request that you keep in mind, that there's also the article List of vice presidents of the United States, not to mention other lists of American officials. Perhaps you should open an RFC covering all those articles, at the appropriate WikiProject. Trying to push such 'big' changes boldly, may only create tension. GoodDay ( talk) 19:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Happy template editing! ~ TheresNoTime ( to explain!) 05:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for all your recent work at BOTREQ. The table of contents on that page uses Category:Wikipedia bot operators to determine the "last botop editor" column, and I think you definitely qualify as one. So if you felt like using {{ User bot owner}}, {{ User wikipedia/Botop}}, or that category directly, I think that might make the table a little more accurate. Happy botting! Enterprisey ( talk!) 09:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Tol. Hope all is well. :)
Just a quick SPI clerk note: Please don't notify people that others have filed SPIs against them. Really even filers shouldn't do that, but if the filer chooses not to (the correct decision 99% of the time), it's best to leave the decision to a clerk, patrolling admin, or CU. Really the only reason we need subjects' participation at SPI is if there's confirmation (by CU or behavior) that someone has engaged in the alleged behavior, but a possible AGF explanation as to why. Otherwise, notifying someone just tends to attract a lot of bluster and turn SPI into mini-ANI. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 16:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Draft:Elastic chewing gum was not accepted due to the lack of reliable external sources. May I ask which statements in the article should be backed up with external sources? Peer-18 ( talk) 22:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)