Speedy deletion of Fatal Care: Survive in the US Health System
A tag has been placed on Fatal Care: Survive in the US Health System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Tresiden (
talk) 16:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I deleted it because it reads like the back cover of a book trying to entice the reader into buying a copy. Also, it is not written in a neutral point of view. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
What specifically is not neutral? Can you point out any sentences? Whatever suggestions you make, I'll follow. I used the Jerome Groopman book How Doctors Think as a model. In fact, Groopman's first chapter is about Dr. Deeb Salem who was a major advocate of Fatal Care. Dr. Kumar's a widely recognized leader in the patient safety community. If my article is not neutral, it's certainly not his fault.--T.J. TedescoT. J. Tedesco 04:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you have a personal or professional connection with Sanjaya Kumar, MD, &/or Fatal Care: Survive in the U.S. Health System &/or Quantros? All of your edits seem to be about these very limited topics, and seem somewhat promotional. You may want to review WP:COI to understands the expectations here on Wikipedia about conflicts-of-interest. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 22:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Quantros for deletion
The article Quantros is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
-- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû ( blah?) 22:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Fatal Care: Survive in the US Health System
A tag has been placed on Fatal Care: Survive in the US Health System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Tresiden (
talk) 16:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I deleted it because it reads like the back cover of a book trying to entice the reader into buying a copy. Also, it is not written in a neutral point of view. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
What specifically is not neutral? Can you point out any sentences? Whatever suggestions you make, I'll follow. I used the Jerome Groopman book How Doctors Think as a model. In fact, Groopman's first chapter is about Dr. Deeb Salem who was a major advocate of Fatal Care. Dr. Kumar's a widely recognized leader in the patient safety community. If my article is not neutral, it's certainly not his fault.--T.J. TedescoT. J. Tedesco 04:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you have a personal or professional connection with Sanjaya Kumar, MD, &/or Fatal Care: Survive in the U.S. Health System &/or Quantros? All of your edits seem to be about these very limited topics, and seem somewhat promotional. You may want to review WP:COI to understands the expectations here on Wikipedia about conflicts-of-interest. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 22:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Quantros for deletion
The article Quantros is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
-- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû ( blah?) 22:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)