This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why did you revert the change? You say "subjective writing, no quotes used". I used the same expressions as in the article, but paraphrased. Read it yourself. -- 134.93.78.76 ( talk) 09:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Where are you getting this spelling when "Suì-Fēng" is official?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 03:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello TIntor2. I have written to User:Havermeyer to see if he will voluntarily undo his move. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you introducing a variation of the referencing style I created to List of Naruto characters. As you know, I'm not quite happy with it yet. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on my latest version. Good raise 15:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I wonder, is File:KonohamaruIruka.PNG being replaced because now there are better images of another character that are there, and you do not want the character page to have too many images? Thanks WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
it's in WP:ANIME archives, it wasn't that long ago, so you'll be able to find it. Anyways. it was discussed. Bread Ninja ( talk) 00:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Squall Leonhart shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
For what it's worth, I agree that "protagonist" is more appropriate than "hero", but this needs to be worked out at the talk page, not through reverting. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 19:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I finished copy editing for grammar and other style issues. Here are recommendations that I think will improve the article.
Hope it helps. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC))
Hi, I am a Wikipedian and researcher from Carnegie Mellon University, working with Professors Robert E. Kraut and Aniket Kittur. We’ve published many scholarly papers on Wikipedia and are partnering with the Wikimedia Foundation on several new projects.
I have been analyzing collaboration in Wikipedia, especially Collaborations of the Week/Month. My analysis of seven years of archival Wikipedia data shows that Collaborations of the Week/Month substantially increase the amount and nature of project members’ contributions, with long lasting effects. We would like to talk to Wikipedians to better understand the processes that that produce this behavior change.
We’ve identified you as a particularly good candidate to speak with because of your involvement with the WikiProject Video games' Collaborations, which is one of those we’ve been investigating. It would really help us if you would be willing to have a short talk with us, less than 30 minutes of your time. We can talk via skype or instant messenger or other means if you’d prefer. Do you have time at any point during this week to chat? If so, please leave a message on my talk page.
Thanks! ( This my personal website) Haiyizhu ( talk) 04:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the edits I've made on the Sephiroth page I was just trying to help, don't worry I won't edit anything again.-- 68.205.43.4 ( talk) 21:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Naruto Uzumaki you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Naruto Uzumaki for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Redtigerxyz Talk 10:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
This is for all of your edits on the Dragon Ball Z articles. VegetaSaiyan ( talk) 00:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas! | |
Best wishes, Fleet Command ( talk) 17:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
Sorry! My bad, yes, I removed too much @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 20:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your support and a Merry (belated) Christmas to you as well. You had asked me last year if I had the Mega Man Official Complete Works books for information regarding the Mega Man Legends articles. Well, I got the the original and X books (obviously or the development sections all the MM article would be pretty poor) but they have no information on the Legends series. However, there are some Japan-exclusive DASH books you could tap if you have the time. This page has some links to some translations if you're interested. ~ Hibana ( talk) 20:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Can you please give your source from where you assumed the anime had 5 seasons and grouped them as such? The new season order that you placed conflicts with the article and the sources, either fix those things and give sources for the new order or revert the changes so that the sources, article and season order reflect each other. By the way those articles (including the article on individual seasons) were once considered as featured article and the edits you have made doesn't go with the other info. Personally I think the previous 1-9 season order was correct and since at that time it was approved for FA, I have no reasons to believe otherwise but if you have some proofs that the new 1-5 season order is the right one, then I would definitely like to hear that and if not then please correct them all asap. 117.197.241.202 ( talk) 06:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
OK it keeps Vandailsm It Revert Edits North Amercian's Release Date is March 13, 2012 I Don-t Know How Protect Page Thanks Joeblanc98 ( talk) 05, January 2012 21:29 (UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC).
Listing this information is not pushing into game guide territory. The Tarot motif is central to the games and is an important aspect. You made a bold edit, and I partially reverted it. Instead of reverting me entirely and doing a whole additional series of edits that go against the established form of the pages, it would be best to raise your issues on the talk page.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Also it is not a stretch to say that the next episode of Persona 4 is going to air a week from yesterday, considering the English simulcast is scheduled for that day.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 21:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you not copy-edit the Persona 4 episode list? You are removing things that interconnect with other episodes (Yuuta seeing Nanako in her costume in episode 13 is the reason he fights with Kaneko in episode 14; and Nanako comes across all of the people we see in episode 14, so mentioning Shu in some manner is important) and things that are otherwise relevant (the reason why Rise chooses the night club in episode 15; why Kanji is keeping everyone from helping Naoto in episode 16). I'm not even sure if you've even seen the programs to determine what information is relevant to the plot or not. So could you leave the copy-editing to Jinnai, who has been doing a bang up job of it?— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 23:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations! I appreciate your responsiveness! And your hard work. Best wishes, MathewTownsend ( talk) 02:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Thanks Tintor2 for helping to promote Naruto Uzumaki to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 05:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
I do not know why you removed it, but I have restored the table on the Persona 4 Arena article. It is not necessary to have all of that exposition in prose when a tabular format provides the information in a clearer and more coherent matter. Also, the information on the Personas thecharacters is important to the game, even though you suggest it is not important to the article, as it is the name of the game. And also, the prose as you wrote it suggests that the three Persona 3 characters use their initial Personas from the game, rather than the ones that are listed on the official website and are supported by all of the reliable sources.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 03:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I saw your edit. The fighting game is inherently different from the other Persona pages so we should treat it as a fighting game, or at least provide the information in a way that isn't bogged down in prose.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited List of Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas chapters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why did you revert the change? You say "subjective writing, no quotes used". I used the same expressions as in the article, but paraphrased. Read it yourself. -- 134.93.78.76 ( talk) 09:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Where are you getting this spelling when "Suì-Fēng" is official?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 03:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello TIntor2. I have written to User:Havermeyer to see if he will voluntarily undo his move. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you introducing a variation of the referencing style I created to List of Naruto characters. As you know, I'm not quite happy with it yet. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on my latest version. Good raise 15:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I wonder, is File:KonohamaruIruka.PNG being replaced because now there are better images of another character that are there, and you do not want the character page to have too many images? Thanks WhisperToMe ( talk) 09:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
it's in WP:ANIME archives, it wasn't that long ago, so you'll be able to find it. Anyways. it was discussed. Bread Ninja ( talk) 00:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Squall Leonhart shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
For what it's worth, I agree that "protagonist" is more appropriate than "hero", but this needs to be worked out at the talk page, not through reverting. rʨanaɢ ( talk) 19:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I finished copy editing for grammar and other style issues. Here are recommendations that I think will improve the article.
Hope it helps. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC))
Hi, I am a Wikipedian and researcher from Carnegie Mellon University, working with Professors Robert E. Kraut and Aniket Kittur. We’ve published many scholarly papers on Wikipedia and are partnering with the Wikimedia Foundation on several new projects.
I have been analyzing collaboration in Wikipedia, especially Collaborations of the Week/Month. My analysis of seven years of archival Wikipedia data shows that Collaborations of the Week/Month substantially increase the amount and nature of project members’ contributions, with long lasting effects. We would like to talk to Wikipedians to better understand the processes that that produce this behavior change.
We’ve identified you as a particularly good candidate to speak with because of your involvement with the WikiProject Video games' Collaborations, which is one of those we’ve been investigating. It would really help us if you would be willing to have a short talk with us, less than 30 minutes of your time. We can talk via skype or instant messenger or other means if you’d prefer. Do you have time at any point during this week to chat? If so, please leave a message on my talk page.
Thanks! ( This my personal website) Haiyizhu ( talk) 04:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the edits I've made on the Sephiroth page I was just trying to help, don't worry I won't edit anything again.-- 68.205.43.4 ( talk) 21:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Naruto Uzumaki you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Naruto Uzumaki for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Redtigerxyz Talk 10:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
This is for all of your edits on the Dragon Ball Z articles. VegetaSaiyan ( talk) 00:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas! | |
Best wishes, Fleet Command ( talk) 17:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
Sorry! My bad, yes, I removed too much @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 20:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your support and a Merry (belated) Christmas to you as well. You had asked me last year if I had the Mega Man Official Complete Works books for information regarding the Mega Man Legends articles. Well, I got the the original and X books (obviously or the development sections all the MM article would be pretty poor) but they have no information on the Legends series. However, there are some Japan-exclusive DASH books you could tap if you have the time. This page has some links to some translations if you're interested. ~ Hibana ( talk) 20:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Can you please give your source from where you assumed the anime had 5 seasons and grouped them as such? The new season order that you placed conflicts with the article and the sources, either fix those things and give sources for the new order or revert the changes so that the sources, article and season order reflect each other. By the way those articles (including the article on individual seasons) were once considered as featured article and the edits you have made doesn't go with the other info. Personally I think the previous 1-9 season order was correct and since at that time it was approved for FA, I have no reasons to believe otherwise but if you have some proofs that the new 1-5 season order is the right one, then I would definitely like to hear that and if not then please correct them all asap. 117.197.241.202 ( talk) 06:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
OK it keeps Vandailsm It Revert Edits North Amercian's Release Date is March 13, 2012 I Don-t Know How Protect Page Thanks Joeblanc98 ( talk) 05, January 2012 21:29 (UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 02:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC).
Listing this information is not pushing into game guide territory. The Tarot motif is central to the games and is an important aspect. You made a bold edit, and I partially reverted it. Instead of reverting me entirely and doing a whole additional series of edits that go against the established form of the pages, it would be best to raise your issues on the talk page.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Also it is not a stretch to say that the next episode of Persona 4 is going to air a week from yesterday, considering the English simulcast is scheduled for that day.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 21:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you not copy-edit the Persona 4 episode list? You are removing things that interconnect with other episodes (Yuuta seeing Nanako in her costume in episode 13 is the reason he fights with Kaneko in episode 14; and Nanako comes across all of the people we see in episode 14, so mentioning Shu in some manner is important) and things that are otherwise relevant (the reason why Rise chooses the night club in episode 15; why Kanji is keeping everyone from helping Naoto in episode 16). I'm not even sure if you've even seen the programs to determine what information is relevant to the plot or not. So could you leave the copy-editing to Jinnai, who has been doing a bang up job of it?— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 23:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations! I appreciate your responsiveness! And your hard work. Best wishes, MathewTownsend ( talk) 02:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Thanks Tintor2 for helping to promote Naruto Uzumaki to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 05:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
I do not know why you removed it, but I have restored the table on the Persona 4 Arena article. It is not necessary to have all of that exposition in prose when a tabular format provides the information in a clearer and more coherent matter. Also, the information on the Personas thecharacters is important to the game, even though you suggest it is not important to the article, as it is the name of the game. And also, the prose as you wrote it suggests that the three Persona 3 characters use their initial Personas from the game, rather than the ones that are listed on the official website and are supported by all of the reliable sources.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 03:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I saw your edit. The fighting game is inherently different from the other Persona pages so we should treat it as a fighting game, or at least provide the information in a way that isn't bogged down in prose.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 20:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited List of Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas chapters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)