In the last couple of days, I've tried repeatedly to upload (to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload) a couple of plain-vanilla JPEG images. No joy on either -- the current one returns a message that '.' is not an accepted image format. Yes, it says '.' Help?

Pete Tillman 19:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply

In case anyone wants to try to duplicate this, try uploading this image (fair use of a book cover): http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n28/n143506.jpg Title it "Telzey & Crest Cats", in case it works... <g> Pete Tillman 20:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply

• Macs tend to leave off file extensions which cause the system to think it doesn't have one. Another potential problem could be not the name of the file you upload, but the destination name. Try uploading without the ampersand in the name. - Mgm| ^(talk) 13:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply
• Why call it "Telzey & Crest Cats"? That's not what it says on the cover. - Mgm| ^(talk) 19:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Because that's what it is? Very nice art, by Bob Eggleton. Pete Tillman 21:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

• I've the image to Image:Telzey Amberdon by James H Schmitz - cover.jpg. Make sure it's inserted into an article soon, or it will be deleted. - Mgm| ^(talk) 20:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Done: Telzey Amberdon. Now, if I could just figure out why it won't work for me.... Pete Tillman 21:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

• I saw your addition of the quote to this article. Are you aware of WikiQuote? - Mgm| ^(talk) 19:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Good work but I don't think we can use newsgroups as external links ( [1]) -- Guinnog 03:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC) reply

See Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided. -- Guinnog 08:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

What a nice clean up of List of Arizona Wilderness Areas. (It wasn't easy putting some of the Arizona articles together). plus i've done some stuff in the Lower Colorado River Valley. Too bad I don't have weeks and months to actually Explore, and Climb, and Bird Watch, And Golf Course up and down the Lower Colorado River Valley ! (and all the money required). I just looked at the Pinaleno Mountains page. Wow, what a job done on that page. Michael in theSonoranDesert at Yuma(LCRV)(I went to the UofA in Tucson).. - Mmcannis 12:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Second topic(after looking at your page). I just created: Category:Historical people of U.S. natural history, and only attempted to put people there in one Effort. I added one person since, and it was related to Agassiz, Lake Agassiz, but the geologist Dana, came up whose book I always kept close by: the 17, 18, or 19 edition. You know of what I speak, and why I found his name in the 1800's. Any geology, or other types that are historical enuff, even in the past 30 years to go into this category? I put the Alvarez's in it because of the K-T layer. talk-to-you-later... -- Mmcannis 13:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Just a quick second note. You sent a message to my User: Page: "User:Mmcannis". The message should have been sent to: User_talk: (the Discussion Page). -- Mmcannis 23:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi. I noticed you posted a move request at WP:RM, regarding Village of Oak Creek, Arizona. Unfortunately, due to a bad link on the requests page, your request was actually posted to an invisible sub-page. I've gone ahead and completed the move, since it seems to be an uncontroversial one, simply making the article consistent with other US cities.

I'm letting you know, because I deleted the subpage on which your request was posted, so that edit is now gone from your contribution history, which might seem strange if you were to look for it there. Cheers. - GTBacchus^{( talk)} 03:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm sorry that I didn't reply to you sooner -- it's just one of those things that gets overlooked for a moment, then gets completely forgotten about! I'm sorry you moved out of Tucson before I knew you were here. Hope you're doing well elsewhere. Right now it's been COLD for the last month or so! A couple of real freezes, although not much snow in the mountains.... Best for the New Year! Hayford Peirce 18:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello - I don't know the date, but Graton died in 1970. Cheers Geologyguy 01:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Pete Tillman 03:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Glad to be of service :-) Good to meet another wiki geologist, and one who rubbed shoulders with one of the classics. I never met Williams, but sure became well aquainted with his Petrography text back about 1970 - still have my old copy. Cheers, Vsmith 03:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't have anything on his personal life, let alone his genealogy. It's weird how no one seems to ask scientists about their personal lives, while we have more information than we would ever want on Movie Stars. BTW, I have made a project of making articles for everyone that has won a [[Logan Medal]. That's why I've added several famous geologists to your list. Clerks 20:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Adding external links from a page to your own reviews is generally regarded as spam and should be avoided. Shsilver 21:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Society of Resource Geology, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kt.rim.or.jp/~srg/english.html. As a copyright violation, The Society of Resource Geology appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Society of Resource Geology has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Society of Resource Geology and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Society of Resource Geology with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Society of Resource Geology.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Please do not upload copied text, even as a draft you intend to reword later, because the copyright violation remains in the history. Thanks. Butseriouslyfolks 00:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Sorry, draft, shouldn't have been posted. Hang on. Pete Tillman 00:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply

See Talk:The Society of Resource Geology for explanation. No copyright violation has occurred. Pete Tillman 07:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC) reply

see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission to pursue this, Pete Tillman 07:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I deleted those links because their captions made me see them as unneeded, since Wikipedia isn't a link directory. I don't normally remove the newspaper link; I don't know why I did this time. I've restored the links, with the other two recaptioned. I'm not being overzealous, but I'm likely under-aware of the requirements for external links :-) Nyttend 01:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Hey, no problem. We are all working together here. Nice work on adding the ref, by the way! -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 01:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply

I just looked over your work...and thought that you might want to know about our little wikiproject. I think you really are already a member, but just didn't know about us yet. Come join! -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 01:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply

We keep crossing paths as we edit, so I thought I'd share this with you.

Clerks. has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{ subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi Tillman. You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Geology. Maybe you to please consider helping to improve the oil shale article. This article has developed quite well, but some more expert assistance is needed. Thank you in advance. Beagel 17:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the note! I only ended up putting one of those on the county template, however, for the following reasons:

• Cherry I put on the template.
• Clemenceau I did not put on the template because it's part of an incorporated municipality. If all parts of incorporated municipalities were put on, some county templates would be huge, because some cities (not necessarily in Arizona) have many articles for their many neighborhoods.
• The other three towns I did not put on the template because they're redirects to other pages. If you create separate pages for them, I'll put the template on.

By the way, as far as Cherry: place articles generally do not have ", Arizona" in the "bold intro"; if you look at town articles nationwide you'll generally see "TOWNNAME is a [whatever type of municipality] in COUNTYNAME County, STATENAME, United States."
Thanks again! Nyttend 14:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Hey, no problem. I'll be in Prescott for the next couple weeks, so will hopefully have the chance to add some more photos to Arizona articles. Let me know if there's any that can be done easily from here that aren't listed in the Category of needed photos for Arizona. Cheers! Murderbike 17:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Cool! If you'll check Mingus Mountain, you'll see I stuck one in there yesterday as well. As to those other places, I'll def see what I can do. Thanks for the tips! Murderbike 17:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Hey, went down to the Bradshaw Mountains today, got some photos. I through a few in that article, as well as Lynx Lake, and Goldwater lake (which could use a lot more info, I had to take out a bunch that belonged in a tourist guide). The only thing I could find in Walker worth photographing was the charcoal kiln, which I also put in the BM article. From the peak of Mount Union, I got one of Granite Mountain, I'll see if I can crop it to make it worth using. I was actually thinking of trying to do the Granite Mountain article this week, we'll see how it goes. We didn't get to the other side of 69 though, so nothing for Humboldt and all that. Maybe next time. Cheers! Murderbike 05:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC) reply

In your admirable quest to detect and destroy un-sourced info you also deleted some purely factual material (regarding a historic event in this town) from the section entitled "Recent Events" -- also, you called the material that you deleted POV, when in reality it was material without proper sources -- there's a difference, although you were probably right to delete some of what you deleted. As for the other part, I've restored it. In the future please try and be more careful. Pablosecca 15:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Hmm, sorry for the delay in response. I thought I posted those instructions, I will try to figure out what's up, in the meantime, if you have something that needs assessed I can take a look if you want. IvoShandor 00:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply

There is a quality scale here: [2], but it doesn't really provide instructions and is pretty vague, when I created the project I proposed it and someone took it live when there was only a couple members so I didn't really have anyone else around to get input from on this. It seems there are quite a few members now, I would like to see the project revived. Perhaps a newsletter on a monthly basis would attract people to some discussion. We still really really need to figure out a way to define ghost town for categorization, this has been a semi-contentious issue in the past, I would like to see a consensus evolve. Maybe I will work on a newsletter. IvoShandor 00:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I'd appreciate it if you'd look at Arivaca, Arizona and offer your opinion, checking the sources on the talk page. Nyttend 05:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi. I honestly expected wikipedia to have full detailed articles on Geology by state e.g Geology of California or Geology of Utah. I'm not even from the States but I had fully expected a detailed article on each state. Some of the American geological articles are very poor or non existent see Basic geologic features of each state. PLease could your project aim to start these articles and develop them. All the best and thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 13:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC) reply

(copied to your user talk - so that i'm sure you'll notice it).

Would you please read/reread Help:Reverting, particularly section 1.2. For example:

• Do not simply revert changes that are made as part of a dispute. Be respectful to other editors, their contributions and their points of view.
• Do not revert good faith edits. In other words, try to consider the editor "on the other end." If what one is attempting is a positive contribution to Wikipedia, a revert of those contributions is inappropriate unless, and only unless, you as an editor possess firm, substantive, and objective proof to the contrary. Mere disagreement is not such proof. See also Wikipedia:Assume good faith.

Your wholesale reversions of my edits, such as at James Hansen, clearly violate Wikipedia policy. Pete Tillman ( talk) 01:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Kim, can you read plain English? "Do not revert good faith edits... Mere disagreement is not such proof."

You're getting a bad reputation for this sort of thing. Please desist, and observe Wikipedia policy. Pete Tillman ( talk) 17:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Pete - please take a long hard look at WP:BLP - your quote without a context is not adhering to a neutral point of view. It is a cherry picked quote, which when examining both the discussion articles about it, and the original source, is incomplete and doesn't represent Hansen's views. (i'm referring to Carbon Capture and Storage).

And i can assure you that i try my very hardest to stay within WP rules and guidelines - but since i mostly edit on a controversial subject, a perusal of my talk page will give a scewed view. I'm not assuming any bad faith - and i request that you do not either. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 18:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on James Hansen. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Pete Tillman ( talk) 18:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Had you pointed that out - i would have self-reverted, and i'm deeply sorry. But may I suggest that you yourself take a look at WP:3RR - since you violated it before i did? -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 18:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

In effect you are gaming the system. In fact you are now standing at 5RR . [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] - i suggest that you rerevert back to the last version before 3RR violations -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 18:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I also strongly suggest that you read WP:3RR thoroughly, since BLP violations is excerpt from the rule:

There are other instances where multiple reverts may not constitute a breach of this policy:

• reverts performed by a user within his or her own user page, user subpages, provided that such reverts do not restore copyright violations, libelous material, WP:BLP violations, or other kinds of inappropriate content enumerated in this policy or elsewhere;

-- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 19:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Kim, with all due respect, you are making it very hard for me to assume good faith for your actions. You have now reverted my contribution NINE times. Not once have you made an edit. Would you agree that this is excessive? Pete Tillman ( talk) 19:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

In the face of WP:BLP violations - No.

The rule for BLP NPOV is very simple - we must err on the side of caution. Which is what i've done. The good faith part goes both ways, and frankly i have at no time during this dispute considered your part as being with bad faith. I'm simply not that interested in that particular quote - so if you want it on the article, then you must ensure that it is written in a way so that it is not inflammatory and provides even an implicit POV. Try to address this instead of assuming bad faith. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 19:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Kim, the "BLP violations" exist (sfaict) solely in your own fevered imagination. So far, neutral third parties agree. Why don't you try doing something constructive? Pete Tillman ( talk) 22:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry? Am i going to have to ignore this, and just assume that "fevered imagination" is somehow civil and assuming good faith? Or is it what i think it is... a personal attack? -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 00:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Will you please stop this [8]. (and btw. i am male). -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 22:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the wrong-gender assumption :-( -- I even went to HS with a male Kim!. Oh, well. Cheers -- Pete Tillman ( talk) 23:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello there. I removed the “unbalanced” tag you recently placed in Freeport-McMoRan as you have provided no rational on the talk page. Such tags should not be there if the issue is not discussed on talk – in fact, using talk without tags is a much more satisfactory and possibly less disruptive approach.

Happy to discuss anytime. Kind regards and happy editing -- Merbabu ( talk) 00:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks :-) -- Merbabu ( talk) 02:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:AZGS logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:One Man's West.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 02:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Meteor Crater Museumjpeg.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Fast 'bot! Both above corrected, Pete Tillman ( talk) 05:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Daniel C. Jackling.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:EulaliaBourne.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Meteor Crater Museumjpeg.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Meteorite Museum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Nininger-portrait.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Sasco,AZ.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Tillman, I have modifed the Non-free historic image template as you requsted. (see below)

This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image or the agency employing the person. It is believed that the use of this image may qualify as non-free use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. Please remember that the non-free content criteria require that non-free images on Wikipedia must not "[be] used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Use of historic images from press agencies must only be of a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts (which is the original market role, and is not allowed per policy). Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tillman/Archive_1 true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Template:Non-free use rationale 2 may be helpful for stating the rationale. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template. If this tag does not accurately describe this image, please replace it with an appropriate one.

— WHLfan ( talk) 05:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Samoan American drummer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [9], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Samoan American drummer.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:2CEs, SD Fwy2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [10], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:2CEs, SD Fwy2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:2WAVES, 1950.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [11], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:2WAVES, 1950.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Selig Zoo Archway.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [12], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Selig Zoo Archway.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:James ZogbyC.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [13], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:James ZogbyC.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:AMTDZoot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [14], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:AMTDZoot.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Joyce Hoffman.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [15], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Joyce Hoffman.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 23:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Ansel Adams, 1980.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [16], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ansel Adams, 1980.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Mexicana-LAX-radar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [17], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mexicana-LAX-radar.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:First B-1, Palmdale.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [18], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:First B-1, Palmdale.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Lockheed AWACS, 1984.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [19], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Lockheed AWACS, 1984.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Airliner on Sepulveda?.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [20], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Airliner on Sepulveda?.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Los Angeles Airport, 1931.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [21], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Los Angeles Airport, 1931.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Helicopter air mail, 1947 .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [22], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Helicopter air mail, 1947 .jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Helen Gahagan Douglas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [23], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Helen Gahagan Douglas.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Sandy Duncan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [24], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Sandy Duncan.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Pan-Pacific 1956.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [25], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Pan-Pacific 1956.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 00:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply