{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Zsinj
Talk 20:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Theenglishman124 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am here to contribute good work to wikipedia i was just being silly on my talk page im sorry i will stop doing that. you can see on The Rutles page i expanded that article. Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
- The specific reasons for the block were:
- Your user talk page is not for self-harassment. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia constructively, and more information on how to do so can be found at Help:Editing.
- Your recent edit history contains an instance of breaking WP:3RR and you continue to actively edit the article on which it occurred. I see that you engaged on the article’s talk page and are no longer insisting on the inclusion of the material that was contested for inclusion.
- If you are willing and able to contribute constructively and work with others to improve Wikipedia, I am comfortable unblocking. Zsinj Talk 20:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would suggest you read
WP:TALKNO to see what is not allowed on your talk page. You also don't own your talk page per
WP:OWN. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- yes i will remove the silliness Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
yes i am willing to do that i will never again start edit wars. i am dedicated to improving articles, and will work with other editors to do so. Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Theenglishman124! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Zsinj Talk 20:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Zsinj
Talk 20:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Theenglishman124 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am here to contribute good work to wikipedia i was just being silly on my talk page im sorry i will stop doing that. you can see on The Rutles page i expanded that article. Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
- The specific reasons for the block were:
- Your user talk page is not for self-harassment. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia constructively, and more information on how to do so can be found at Help:Editing.
- Your recent edit history contains an instance of breaking WP:3RR and you continue to actively edit the article on which it occurred. I see that you engaged on the article’s talk page and are no longer insisting on the inclusion of the material that was contested for inclusion.
- If you are willing and able to contribute constructively and work with others to improve Wikipedia, I am comfortable unblocking. Zsinj Talk 20:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would suggest you read
WP:TALKNO to see what is not allowed on your talk page. You also don't own your talk page per
WP:OWN. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:39, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- yes i will remove the silliness Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
yes i am willing to do that i will never again start edit wars. i am dedicated to improving articles, and will work with other editors to do so. Theenglishman124 ( talk) 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Theenglishman124! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Zsinj Talk 20:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.