This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I notice you assume the stance on behalf of Wikipedia as that that comes from 'secular academia'. Please understand that Theism and Atheism are at opposite ends of a spectrum, both making a claim to knowledge (God exists, God does not exist respectively). In the middle of the spectrum you find agnosticism, which does NOT make a claim in either of those directions. I would ask you to reconsider your base line for what you allow Ito stance. Agnosticism is a stance that is on the path of inquiry, like science, and is not predisposed in either direction, but allows the evidence to lead where it will lead.
Usul1980 ( talk) 19:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I notice you assume the stance on behalf of Wikipedia as that that comes from 'secular academia'. Please understand that Theism and Atheism are at opposite ends of a spectrum, both making a claim to knowledge (God exists, God does not exist respectively). In the middle of the spectrum you find agnosticism, which does NOT make a claim in either of those directions. I would ask you to reconsider your base line for what you allow Ito stance. Agnosticism is a stance that is on the path of inquiry, like science, and is not predisposed in either direction, but allows the evidence to lead where it will lead.
Usul1980 ( talk) 19:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)