Welcome!
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mads Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
Nassau (region)
- added links pointing to Orange-Nassau, Höchst, Rüdesheim and Herborn
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duchy of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange-Nassau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
You recently moved the article German Army (1935-45) to German Army (1935–46). The reason you gave was that the German Army of World War II was demobilized only in 1946. The source you cited in the article refers to a formation of the military police disbanded in 1946.
I should like to ask you to undo your move, as the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany as well as the Federal Court of Justice of Germany have both ruled in the 1950s that the German Wehrmacht, and all it constituent parts, have ceased to exist after 8 May 1945. Furthermore, the CC ruled that the Proclamation No.2, Directive 18 and Law No. 34 of the Allied Control Commission were merely declaratory in character. So under German law, which should apply in this case, 8 May 1945 marks the end of all German military forces.
ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 17:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- As long as someone is a prisoner of war, they are actively serving military personnel, and since most prisoners of war were repatriated and demobilized only in 1946, and since a number of army functions continued to be active until that time, for example the military justice passing out sentences on soldiers while POWs for things like, being rude to an officer or not obeying orders, the army was certainly not disbanded on 8 May 1945. That's a laughable idea, and absolutely not how a surrender works under international law. An army can not per definition be "disbanded" as long as it still has (as it had until 1946) a vast number of actively serving military personnel under military jurisdiction who have not been demobilized. First when all personnel is demobilized, an army can be disbanded. Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 05:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I am sure you have reliable sources supporting your view. ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 06:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The Wehrmacht was only dissolved on 20 August 1946 by the Allied control council, after it had been demobilized from the summer of 1945 onwards and through 1946. (Large, David Clay (1996). Germans to the Front: West German Rearmament in the Adenauer Era, p. 25). This is of course also mentioned in the main Wehrmacht article. Until that date, it was active, with serving (conscripted and professional) military personnel wearing Army uniform and being under military Wehrmacht Army jurisdiction and military command. There was quite a lot of activity going on involving the Wehrmacht Army in the time after 8 May 1945. (It's impossible to demobilize an army with millions of soldiers stationed in multiple countries in just one day.) If it had been disbanded on 8 May 1945, the conscripted Army soldiers would by definition no longer be obliged to serve (not be under military command) and could not have been held as POWs under international law any longer; this was of course not the case at all.
Tadeusz Nowak (
talk) 08:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I think this should be discussed in a more approbriate setting, like here. ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 09:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The Wehrmacht was only dissolved on 20 August 1946 by the Allied control council, after it had been demobilized from the summer of 1945 onwards and through 1946. (Large, David Clay (1996). Germans to the Front: West German Rearmament in the Adenauer Era, p. 25). This is of course also mentioned in the main Wehrmacht article. Until that date, it was active, with serving (conscripted and professional) military personnel wearing Army uniform and being under military Wehrmacht Army jurisdiction and military command. There was quite a lot of activity going on involving the Wehrmacht Army in the time after 8 May 1945. (It's impossible to demobilize an army with millions of soldiers stationed in multiple countries in just one day.) If it had been disbanded on 8 May 1945, the conscripted Army soldiers would by definition no longer be obliged to serve (not be under military command) and could not have been held as POWs under international law any longer; this was of course not the case at all.
Tadeusz Nowak (
talk) 08:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I think you handled the discussion quite well. Great job! Thanks MisterBee1966 ( talk) 15:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:German neo-Nazi Lutz Bachmann dressed as Adolf Hitler.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rayukk ( talk) 11:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Wuerzele ( talk) 10:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please use edit summaries. Thank you! 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC) 12.180.133.18 ( talk) 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- To reiterate, please use edit summaries. Cheers! -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 21:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Müller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Lagerfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. If you think there's a 4chan trolling issue here and you have some evidence for it, I'd strongly suggest you drop a note at WP:ANI so that multiple editors can keep an eye on it. It would be worth mentioning the two transracial articles, the Dolezal article, and the editors User:XavierItzm and User:Andhisteam. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't suspect any specific editors here on WP of being affiliated with 4chan, but it's pretty well known that the "transracial" neologism is pushed on 4chan, Reddit etc. [1] Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 20:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Frank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lutz Bachmann posing as Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho ( talk) 04:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Melissa Bachman edits
Hi, Tadeusz. I wrote a detailed response to your edits on Talk:Melissa_Bachman#February_3_edits. I'll discuss most, and hopefully we can reach a compromise that will be acceptable to both of us. One I will be reverting outright per WP:BLP, that's also explained there, please don't restore it. -- GRuban ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben Building, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Frankfurt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
When dealing with major articles such as Luftwaffe and German Air Force, please discuss moving the articles first on their talk pages, and wait for a consensus to move them. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 03:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- There was no consensus for splitting them in such a confusing and misleading way in the first place, or for using names that are far less common in English sources. -- Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 03:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Names are a sore point here, you need to discuss first, then move. Failure to do so is usually construed as nonconstructive editing. I've reverted your moves and locked down the pages pending a discussion of the changed names. TomStar81 ( Talk) 08:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Following a discussion at WT:MILHIST, and a string of unconstructive edits for which multiple editors have tried to warn you about, I am about to block you for two days. YOU MUST TALK WITH OTHER EDITORS ON TALK PAGES ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL CHANGES. I would politely ask you to come and provide your side of the story at WT:MILHIST after the 48-hour block has expired. Feel free to appeal this block at my talkpage or the other usual means. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Clearly Buckshot06 means that you can appeal the block at your talk page not his! — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tadeusz Nowak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Junge Freiheit logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mads Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
Nassau (region)
- added links pointing to Orange-Nassau, Höchst, Rüdesheim and Herborn
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duchy of Nassau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange-Nassau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
You recently moved the article German Army (1935-45) to German Army (1935–46). The reason you gave was that the German Army of World War II was demobilized only in 1946. The source you cited in the article refers to a formation of the military police disbanded in 1946.
I should like to ask you to undo your move, as the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany as well as the Federal Court of Justice of Germany have both ruled in the 1950s that the German Wehrmacht, and all it constituent parts, have ceased to exist after 8 May 1945. Furthermore, the CC ruled that the Proclamation No.2, Directive 18 and Law No. 34 of the Allied Control Commission were merely declaratory in character. So under German law, which should apply in this case, 8 May 1945 marks the end of all German military forces.
ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 17:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- As long as someone is a prisoner of war, they are actively serving military personnel, and since most prisoners of war were repatriated and demobilized only in 1946, and since a number of army functions continued to be active until that time, for example the military justice passing out sentences on soldiers while POWs for things like, being rude to an officer or not obeying orders, the army was certainly not disbanded on 8 May 1945. That's a laughable idea, and absolutely not how a surrender works under international law. An army can not per definition be "disbanded" as long as it still has (as it had until 1946) a vast number of actively serving military personnel under military jurisdiction who have not been demobilized. First when all personnel is demobilized, an army can be disbanded. Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 05:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I am sure you have reliable sources supporting your view. ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 06:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The Wehrmacht was only dissolved on 20 August 1946 by the Allied control council, after it had been demobilized from the summer of 1945 onwards and through 1946. (Large, David Clay (1996). Germans to the Front: West German Rearmament in the Adenauer Era, p. 25). This is of course also mentioned in the main Wehrmacht article. Until that date, it was active, with serving (conscripted and professional) military personnel wearing Army uniform and being under military Wehrmacht Army jurisdiction and military command. There was quite a lot of activity going on involving the Wehrmacht Army in the time after 8 May 1945. (It's impossible to demobilize an army with millions of soldiers stationed in multiple countries in just one day.) If it had been disbanded on 8 May 1945, the conscripted Army soldiers would by definition no longer be obliged to serve (not be under military command) and could not have been held as POWs under international law any longer; this was of course not the case at all.
Tadeusz Nowak (
talk) 08:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- I think this should be discussed in a more approbriate setting, like here. ÄDA - DÄP VA ( talk) 09:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The Wehrmacht was only dissolved on 20 August 1946 by the Allied control council, after it had been demobilized from the summer of 1945 onwards and through 1946. (Large, David Clay (1996). Germans to the Front: West German Rearmament in the Adenauer Era, p. 25). This is of course also mentioned in the main Wehrmacht article. Until that date, it was active, with serving (conscripted and professional) military personnel wearing Army uniform and being under military Wehrmacht Army jurisdiction and military command. There was quite a lot of activity going on involving the Wehrmacht Army in the time after 8 May 1945. (It's impossible to demobilize an army with millions of soldiers stationed in multiple countries in just one day.) If it had been disbanded on 8 May 1945, the conscripted Army soldiers would by definition no longer be obliged to serve (not be under military command) and could not have been held as POWs under international law any longer; this was of course not the case at all.
Tadeusz Nowak (
talk) 08:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I think you handled the discussion quite well. Great job! Thanks MisterBee1966 ( talk) 15:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:German neo-Nazi Lutz Bachmann dressed as Adolf Hitler.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rayukk ( talk) 11:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Wuerzele ( talk) 10:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please use edit summaries. Thank you! 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC) 12.180.133.18 ( talk) 20:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- To reiterate, please use edit summaries. Cheers! -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 21:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Müller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Lagerfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. If you think there's a 4chan trolling issue here and you have some evidence for it, I'd strongly suggest you drop a note at WP:ANI so that multiple editors can keep an eye on it. It would be worth mentioning the two transracial articles, the Dolezal article, and the editors User:XavierItzm and User:Andhisteam. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't suspect any specific editors here on WP of being affiliated with 4chan, but it's pretty well known that the "transracial" neologism is pushed on 4chan, Reddit etc. [1] Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 20:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Frank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lutz Bachmann posing as Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho ( talk) 04:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Melissa Bachman edits
Hi, Tadeusz. I wrote a detailed response to your edits on Talk:Melissa_Bachman#February_3_edits. I'll discuss most, and hopefully we can reach a compromise that will be acceptable to both of us. One I will be reverting outright per WP:BLP, that's also explained there, please don't restore it. -- GRuban ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IG Farben Building, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Frankfurt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
When dealing with major articles such as Luftwaffe and German Air Force, please discuss moving the articles first on their talk pages, and wait for a consensus to move them. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 03:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- There was no consensus for splitting them in such a confusing and misleading way in the first place, or for using names that are far less common in English sources. -- Tadeusz Nowak ( talk) 03:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Names are a sore point here, you need to discuss first, then move. Failure to do so is usually construed as nonconstructive editing. I've reverted your moves and locked down the pages pending a discussion of the changed names. TomStar81 ( Talk) 08:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Following a discussion at WT:MILHIST, and a string of unconstructive edits for which multiple editors have tried to warn you about, I am about to block you for two days. YOU MUST TALK WITH OTHER EDITORS ON TALK PAGES ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL CHANGES. I would politely ask you to come and provide your side of the story at WT:MILHIST after the 48-hour block has expired. Feel free to appeal this block at my talkpage or the other usual means. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Clearly Buckshot06 means that you can appeal the block at your talk page not his! — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tadeusz Nowak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Junge Freiheit logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)