|
Hi Squiver! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 12:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Not a surprise, Mr. Stradivarius; at least it's not to me. When I first saw this account, and looked at the edit history...I knew. My user page is clear that I usually recognize these editors as non-new. I was tempted to question Squiver about which account he or she previously edited under, as I've done with some other accounts that I recognized as non-new, but there's always that nagging WP:Assume good faith thing, and people who may think I yell "Sockpuppet!" too much. Anyway, I see that you indefinitely blocked Squiver as a WP:Sockpuppet of Sardanaphalus. Thanks for tackling the abuse. Flyer22 ( talk) 12:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Block review - Squiver and Sardanaphalus. Thank you. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 15:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Squiver! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 12:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Not a surprise, Mr. Stradivarius; at least it's not to me. When I first saw this account, and looked at the edit history...I knew. My user page is clear that I usually recognize these editors as non-new. I was tempted to question Squiver about which account he or she previously edited under, as I've done with some other accounts that I recognized as non-new, but there's always that nagging WP:Assume good faith thing, and people who may think I yell "Sockpuppet!" too much. Anyway, I see that you indefinitely blocked Squiver as a WP:Sockpuppet of Sardanaphalus. Thanks for tackling the abuse. Flyer22 ( talk) 12:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Block review - Squiver and Sardanaphalus. Thank you. —
Mr. Stradivarius
♪ talk ♪ 15:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)