Welcome!

Hello, Spiel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

A tag has been placed on Jeff Novak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 22:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, Spiel! Yes, unfortunately, the article has been deleted. Speedy deletions are like that :) What you'll want to do is create the article again - but before you do, take a look at the biography guidelines and the notability guidelines. In this case, make sure to mention his being "the first to successfully sue an NFL team for damages" - that will assert notability. If you can include a reference to a web page or print article that discusses that fact, you'll be sure to escape the speedy deletion process. Hope that helps, and I hope you're not discouraged by the process. There are thousands of NFL players, so Wikipedia tries to ensure that only the ones that are actually notable are included in the encyclopedia. If you have any further questions (about Wikipedia - I know nothing about football ;), feel free to leave me a message. And welcome to Wikipedia! -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 04:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi did you take this pic? Genisock2 ( talk) 09:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Yes, I did. I was at his office meeting with him and he let me take a photo. reply

Do you have a reference for the information you submitted about his residence? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply

They have mentioned it repeatedly on the news and I live 12 miles away from the crash and about 6 miles away from the house. He lived nowhere near San Marcos which is at least 40 miles away.

I appreciate that you likely have the information, but we need a reference. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply

http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/18/house_fire_in_north_austin.html

Not being anywhere near Texas, I'm not sure if there is any call to say that the reference is unusable, but it doesn't mention Scofield Ridge. Could I get some explanation for why this reference is usable? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The office complex is in Northwest Austin, not the south side of town. I work on 183 and could see the smoke from my 4th story office window. -- Cdman882 ( talk) 19:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply

It is not an IRS building. They had an office in the building. ( http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,586581,00.html) And I quote: "An Internal Revenue Service office is located inside the building." We have to be very clear about that, because I have people now e-mailing me freaked out about friends who work for the main IRS complex. We do not need to start that rumor.

Hi Spiel,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Books!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

• You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
• You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
• Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Books, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Books!

Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 ( talk) 15:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi Spiel! Hope you don't mind my reaching out to you; I found your name at WikiProject Books as you're one of the very few still-active editors listed there and also note that you're interested in helping with non-fiction books. I'm looking for help with an edit request for Wednesday Martin, the author of Primates of Park Avenue. On that Talk page, I'm proposing some updates to the Works section of the article to add a full list of her written works and a short mention of her most recent book. While I've left some notes at relevant WikiProjects, I've had trouble finding someone to take a quick look. I do have a financial conflict of interest as I'm proposing the updates as part of my work with Beutler Ink, on behalf of Wednesday Martin. If you have a few minutes, would be you be able to help? Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 21:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi there, just wanted to let you know that another editor has looked at this request. I will have a few more requests for the article, so if you're interested, definitely do take a peek at the Talk page. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 16:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC) reply

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Will-furrer-2005.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Rosamund Grosvenor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JSFarmanJSFarman|talk]]) 01:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I’m not done yet. I just started like ten minutes ago. Spiel ( talk) 01:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

It was published in the mainspace, which I don't think was what you intended. JSFarman ( talk) 01:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

There is no submit button at the top of the page. I have been working with Wikipedia for years and this is the first time this has ever happened to me. Is this a new rule? Spiel ( talk) 04:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC) JSFarman ( talk) 05:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The first message is a template; apologies for not being more specific.

I moved the article because I thought you had unintentionally published it -- it looked like a work-in-progress. I removed the submit button from the draft because you don't need to submit the article when you're finished with it - you can just move it back to the mainspace. JSFarman ( talk) 05:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Some of the content you included in the above draft appears to have been copied from http://www.westendatwar.org.uk/page/incident3?path=0p28p, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, a little content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Yea, it was. That’s why it is in quotation marks. Because it is a quote from a member of the BBC. Spiel ( talk) 20:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

I didn't actually remove the quote. I removed the phrase "and became one of the deadliest V1 attacks of the war" and modified the phrase "A BBC employee described the scene" to read "The BBC said"— Diannaa ( talk) 23:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AssumeGoodWraith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 07:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Spiel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 07:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As per the previous reviewer - more sources are needed to support the statements made in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary ( talk) 09:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This looks like a promising article but it needs a bit more work before it can be published. Right now it doesn't seem very encyclopedic. It should be reorganized using the guidance here WP:MOSBIO. Using phrases like "the first real girlfriend of" is subjective, and hard to prove. (What does a "real" girlfriend even mean? As opposed to a fake girlfriend?) The word "girlfriend" is also a bit anachronistic, so most pages use the term "partner" for premodern unmarried couples. Sites like Ancestry.com aren't considered reliable sources, and neither is Wikipedia. Instead of citing Wikipedia, you should see if there's a reliable source that Wiki page, and use that as your references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples ( talk) 00:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Okay, I will put more work into it. Although, might I add, I have already spent about 30+ hours on this page. In all my years of editing on Wikipedia, I have never spent more time not had more trouble posting an edit or making a page. At some point, I would think the amount of time everyone (including myself) is putting into it would far exceed the small issues it might have.

Honestly, she was the girlfriend of Vita Sackville-West. That's her biggest input to world history. It shaped many lives including Virginia Woolf and her footprint left on the world, while small, was important in the subject of feministic British literature of the early-20th century.

I don't understand why so many have spent so much time focused on this page. That's not a criticism and I am not, by any means, pooh-poohing the amount and quality of work you do with Wikipedia. I inderstand how committed you guys are and thank you for that work.

I guess I am just stunned that so many people seem so committed to spending this amount of time on Vita's girlfriend. Spiel ( talk) 02:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NZ booklovers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NZ booklovers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 02:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:NZ booklovers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 02:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NZ booklovers. Thanks! Theroadislong ( talk) 22:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Schwede66 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

You need secondary sources about NZbooklovers. Not about the awards that they give out but about the organisation itself. If you don’t have these, you may want to ask for the draft to be deleted as it would never be approved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NZ booklovers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NZ booklovers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Schwede 66 17:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mu301 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The original two reviews described the problems with this article accurately. There aren't enough changes since the last decline to re-review or comment on. This is not going to be accepted unless the issues are resolved. Resubmitting is not recommended unless changes are made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NZ booklovers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NZ booklovers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

mikeu ^talk 01:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Spiel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosamund Grosvenor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Spiel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NZ booklovers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Spiel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rosamund Grosvenor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply

I do want to make one final comment about this. I pulled the information from the Netherlands wiki page. I translated it with Google and then made sure the translation was readable. Do you not allow English translations of other wiki pages? Let me know so I don't do it again.

When you asked for more citations i found more. Then you asked for more and I went to look through books most notably one written by Vita. At the end, I think I had 10-15 citations, inter wiki linking, and external links. The page was long and descriptive with information that fully supported it.

I understand some people might not think Rosamund was an important person, but she was. Just because she wasn't a great writer or artist, she played a very important role in the history of the Ton in London and also a role with the life of Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West as well as the futures of several Londoners.

I just don't understand what I did wrong. Please please please let me know where I went wrong on the info on that page. I've never had any problems like that before or sense. It was so weird. No matter what I did, I couldn't make the head editor happy. Spiel ( talk) 03:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello there

I reverted your edits because the source doesn't support the statement. Nordling visited Céline in Denmark and wrote a letter of support for Céline for his first trial. Dozens of others did so as well, and I don't see why Nordling should be singled out. Nordling is hardly mentioned in any of the major biographies of Céline and I don't think being one of dozens of people who wrote letters of support at his trial qualifies him to have such a prominent place in a summary article about Céline. By the way, he was Swedish, not French. Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 09:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I got this information from the wiki Nord page. It seems like it was a good citation from there. Spiel ( talk) 11:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC) reply

No response? Spiel ( talk) 03:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi there Spiel, I have reverted your recent edit on Anna Sorokin as the newly added information didn't include sourcing. If there is sourcing out there feel free to revert. Thanks, Skipple ☎ 00:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

I just added a paragraph mark. What source are you talking about? Maybe I am misunderstanding. I undid it before k saw your note. (Thanks for that btw. Sometimes I have to randomly figure out what the problem was and k always want to educate myself on what to avoid in the future.) Spiel ( talk) 03:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

You know what, I'm completely in the wrong here. For some reason, I thought the Sorokin made investments in technology... line was added by you. I went ahead and added a {{ cn}}, which is what I should have done in the first place. My mistake! Skipple ☎ 03:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page MercyMe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 06:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply